2009/3/5 McGowen, Wendy :
> So since this is a single indexed table, the vmName would be the last
> index, making .118.109.49 acceptable. Plus I've defined it with IMPLIED
> (although is that really necessary?):
No - it's not necessary.
Whether you use implicit or explicit string indexes is totall
riginal Message-
From: Dave Shield [mailto:d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:20 PM
To: McGowen, Wendy
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Trap question: OID for variable from a table
2009/3/4 McGowen, Wendy :
> I haven't done anything
2009/3/4 McGowen, Wendy :
> I haven't done anything with string indices
> yet, but it looks like I just have to convert each character in the
> string to its ASCII equivalent (for example, "vm1" would be .118.109.49,
> correct?).
Perhaps.
It depends on whether the index is IMPLIED or not.
correct?). Easy peasy!
Thanks Dave!!
-Original Message-
From: Dave Shield [mailto:d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:03 AM
To: McGowen, Wendy
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Trap question: OID for variable from a table
2009/3/4 McGowen, Wendy
Hello,
I'm trying to compile a net-snmp agent with authentication and cipher support.
I've compiled the openssl for my target and gave the directory to the
"--with-openssl=dir".
Here's an example:
Make openssl ---> ...openssl/include/openssl/*.h
---> ...openssl/lib/*.a
Configu
2009/3/4 McGowen, Wendy :
> Do I have to include the index
> value in the OID for the vmName object in the trap
I believe so, yes.
>From RFC 2578:
8.1. Mapping of the OBJECTS clause
The OBJECTS clause, which need not be present, defines an ordered
sequence of MIB obje
>Again they should seriously reward the support on this. No question.
So, contact "them" and nominate us.
I understand the Nobel is available. The question is, what category?
Probably a tossup between "Peace" and "economics".
This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to whic
rk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: trap question
>
> > I have just found an example.
> >
> > In /net-snmp/agent/mibgroup/example/notification.c
> >
> > I will use this code if that
Ahh ''mib2c -c mib2c.notify.conf' would seem to be the magic charm I'm
seeking.
Much appreciated,
Garyc
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Shield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gary Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
> I have just found an example.
>
> In /net-snmp/agent/mibgroup/example/notification.c
>
> I will use this code if thats Ok?
Yup - that's a reasonable place to start.
Another is to run
'mib2c -c mib2c.notify.conf'
on your MIB.
But both of these are prima
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: trap question
>
> > 4) Pull a link which has an associated MIB oid type of NOTIFICATION_TYPE
>
> What do you mean by "pull a link" ?
>
>
> > So if I set a value in the NOTIFICATION object
rap generation?
My apologies for the confusion. I misunderstood the usage of the
NOTIFICATION_TYPE.
Much appreciated,
Garyc
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Shield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gary Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed
> 4) Pull a link which has an associated MIB oid type of NOTIFICATION_TYPE
What do you mean by "pull a link" ?
> So if I set a value in the NOTIFICATION object
Sorry - that doesn't make sense.
NOTIFICATION-TYPE objects don't have values,
and you can't SET them.
You can specify a NOTIFICATION
13 matches
Mail list logo
