Re: SNMP and PAM

2004-12-29 Thread Dave Shield
[ Sorry for the delay in following up on this ] > 1. To my understanding, PAM modules require username/password pair to > provide authentication to local accounts. Passwords are not visible > verbatim at the SNMP Agent's end (it is transmitted in some hashed > format). Not really relevant

RE: SNMP and PAM

2004-11-01 Thread John, Jaiber J
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:33:25 -0400, Robert Story (Users) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Robert> However, the IETF is not know for rapid deployment. In other Robert> words, don't hold your breath waiting for this. ;-) Wes> Though I do have a prototype working that authenticates SNMP requests to

Re: SNMP and PAM

2004-10-31 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:33:25 -0400, Robert Story (Users) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Robert> However, the IETF is not know for rapid deployment. In other Robert> words, don't hold your breath waiting for this. ;-) Though I do have a prototype working that authenticates SNMP requests to

Re: SNMP and PAM

2004-10-12 Thread Users
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 20:43:27 +0530 John, wrote: JJJ> Is it possible to configure Net-SNMP to use the local systems' (Linux's) JJJ> user-name/password based authentication No, it is not. JJJ> If not readily possible, how feasible is it to add a PAM (pluggable JJJ> Authentication Module) layer to

SNMP and PAM

2004-10-12 Thread John, Jaiber J
Hi, Is it possible to configure Net-SNMP to use the local systems' (Linux's) user-name/password based authentication similar to other services like FTP, Telnet, NFS, etc? If not readily possible, how feasible is it to add a PAM (pluggable Authentication Module) layer to the Agent to accomplish