Hi,
does anybody know of a tutorial for writing MIBS?
I'm looking for some doc to answer these questions:
1- can I have TRAPs and NOTIFICATIONs in the same MIB?
2- if I don't know whether an NMS will support both, which version
should my application send?
3- what are groups for?
4- I have some bi
Sebastian Bello£º
>does anybody know of a tutorial for writing MIBS?
SMIv2 rfc2578, looking at some standard MIBs
>3- what are groups for?
conformance statement rfc2580
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Leo Lei
2006-09-07
---
Please refer my comments inline SubraSebastian Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi,does anybody know of a tutorial for writing MIBS?I'm looking for some doc to answer these questions:1- can I have TRAPs and NOTIFICATIONs in the same MIB? [Subra] NO. I think compiler gives warning/error.
Subra,
2- ok, so I just should choose a version?
4- my application is a set of binaries, say bin1, bin2, ..., binN; lets
imagine machine mach1 runs bin1 and bin2, and mach2 runs bin1 and bin3;
so maybe the solution is to have mib1 for bin1, mib2 for bin2 and so
on, and query mach1 for mib1 an
On 07/09/06, Sebastian Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2- ok, so I just should choose a version?
If you are writing a MIB, you should use SMIv2 (i.e. NOTIFICATION-TYPE).
There is no reason for using SMIv1 any more, unless you are forced to
by ancient software. SMIv2 has been defined for over
Thanks to all!
Dave Shield escribió:
> On 07/09/06, Sebastian Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2- ok, so I just should choose a version?
>
> If you are writing a MIB, you should use SMIv2 (i.e. NOTIFICATION-TYPE).
> There is no reason for using SMIv1 any more, unless you are forced to
> by anc
In the scenario detailed in a previous mail:
"...my application is a set of binaries, say bin1, bin2, ..., binN; lets
imagine machine mach1 runs bin1 and bin2, and mach2 runs bin1 and bin3; so
maybe the solution is to have mib1 for bin1, mib2 for bin2 and so on,
and query mach1 for mib1 and mib2
On 11/09/06, Sebastian Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does it make sense to have a single machine concentrating the
> information of all of them?
Yes - particularly if the various systems are presented to the outside
world as a single entity.
Consider a parallel compute farm. The external man
Aha, thanks Dave.
Sebastian-
Dave Shield escribió:
On 11/09/06, Sebastian Bello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
does it make sense to have a single machine concentrating the
information of all of them?
Yes - particularly if the various systems are presented to the outsid
