.
-Original Message-
From: Birgit Arkesteijn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 6:24 AM
To: Josh Bers
Cc: 'List for discussion of the Westhawk SNMP stack'
Subject: Re: FW: sending V3 traps with trapsess
Dear Josh,
I've had problems in the past, but I think it
On 09/04/2008, Josh Bers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am concerned that there is a security risk involved with adding such
> trapsess commands into the world readable /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf file. Is
> there a way to suppress the printing of the passwords in this file
The "snmpcmd(1)" man page i
On 09/04/2008, Josh Bers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now I am using 5.3.1 and getting the following error when I configure
> trapsess (found in /var/log/message):
>
> Snmpd[pid]: snmpd: send_trap: USM unknown security name (no such user
> exists)
What's the exact trapsess line (minus passwords
;net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: RE: sending V3 traps with trapsess
Dave,
OK, I will be upgrading shortly to net-snmp 5.3.1. Would you expect with
that version that the following trapsess will use the authoritative engineID
of the currently running snmpd process when sending traps
the /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf readable only by root?
Thanks,
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Josh Bers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:43 PM
To: 'Dave Shield'
Cc: 'net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: RE: sending V3 traps with trapsess
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: sending V3 traps with trapsess
On 07/04/2008, Josh Bers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to identify
> the release version via a MIB variable?
UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionTag.0
Dave
--
On 07/04/2008, Josh Bers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to identify
> the release version via a MIB variable?
UCD-SNMP-MIB::versionTag.0
Dave
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Confe
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Shield
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 5:36 AM
To: Josh Bers
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: sending V3 traps with trapsess
On 03/04/2008, Josh Bers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I will be upgrading shortly to
On 03/04/2008, Josh Bers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I will be upgrading shortly to net-snmp 5.3.1.
5.3.2 might be a better choice, since it includes various
fixes over 5.3.1
> Would you expect with
> that version that the following trapsess will use the authoritative engineID
>
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Shield
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:09 PM
To: Josh Bers
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: sending V3 traps with trapsess
On 02/04/2008, Josh Bers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
On 02/04/2008, Josh Bers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am seeing strange behavior when configuring snmpd to send traps using
> trapsess command in the snmpd.conf file.
>
> When I don't specify an engineID explicitly it attempts to do discovery even
> though I am not asking for INFORMS!
> I am usi
I am seeing strange behavior when configuring snmpd to send traps using
trapsess command in the snmpd.conf file.
When I don't specify an engineID explicitly it attempts to do discovery even
though I am not asking for INFORMS!
I would expect the code to use the authoritative engine ID of the
12 matches
Mail list logo