Thx!
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Dave Shield wrote:
>[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
> any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
> or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
> Also, if I'm busy with my main (paid) wo
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Also, if I'm busy with my main (paid) work, it may well be
some time before I can respond.
Ke
On 6 December 2011 07:21, shay naveh wrote:
> Is there already built-in parallel mechanism 'snmptrapd' ? e.x. 'snmptrapd'
> will listen for incoming traps from these local 'snmpd' instances and will
> redirect them to some receiver.
$ man snmptrapd.conf
:
NOTIFICATION PROCESSING
Hi all,
I am developing a system with multiple 'snmpd' processes on single machine.
I am using 'proxy' directive in snmpd.conf for incoming requests.
Is there already built-in parallel mechanism 'snmptrapd' ? e.x. 'snmptrapd'
will listen for incoming traps from these local 'snmpd' instances and wil
