On Sun, 30 Nov 2014, Emile `iMil' Heitor wrote:
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/export/imil/tmp/test bs=1m count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes transferred in 42.619 secs (24603486 bytes/sec)
Turns out performances are not *that* bad considering the disks I'm using[1][2]
I am curious about the state of COMPAT_* support in NetBSD kernels. In the
distant past I know I had some binaries that I had to run using that support,
but generally don't any longer. Is it still really possible to run 0.8
binaries, for example, on current systems? How is this support
I just ran a binary from 2002-06 on -6, and from 2001-12 on -5 (both
i386). I know that's a long way from 0.8.
I am pretty sure there is no test infrastructure for this. We could add
uuencoded binaries to the sources for some arches, but it's generally
awkward to test things that aren't built.
In article b41c475b-1fb3-435c-809a-b461b4c30...@nmsu.edu,
Brook Milligan br...@nmsu.edu wrote:
I am curious about the state of COMPAT_* support in NetBSD kernels. In
the distant past I know I had some binaries that I had to run using that
support, but generally don't any longer. Is it still
Hello all,
I'm having a strange problem. I've set up an access point using hostapd,
a wifi adapter (ral0), a wired ethernet adapter (mvgbe0 in my dockstar) and
I bridged ral0 and mvgbe0 together using brconfig.
It works fine if I'm on netbsd-6. Specifically, 6.1_STABLE from kernels
I've been
