Consider disabling dead peer detection?
Thor
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:12:38AM -0700, Swift Griggs wrote:
Thanks for a detailed response!
> >May be if someone has, kindly submit a package to pkgsrc or wip. (Just
> >like libreoffice has native as well as Linux emulation version we might
> >have both in future.)
>
> That'd be nice. I like h
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:09:07AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> In my experience, SPD entries are added outside of racoon to tell the
> kernel that certain traffic should have IPsec protection. I don't
> understand how in your setup that's supposed to work, or what is
> triggering racoon to sta
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:11:08PM +0100, Frank Wille wrote:
> Brett Lymn wrote:
>
> > OK, does phase 2 actually complete?
>
> I doubt that. Currently I'm not even sure whether phase 1 completes, because
> the phase1-up script is never called. On the other hand the phase1-down
> script is called,
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, the wise J. Lewis Muir wrote:
On 3/1/16 2:34 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Does anyone know where to look for things like this?
Just a guess, but maybe it tries IPv6 first and fails and prints that
error, but then tries IPv4 and succeeds?
Could be I don't know. Is there a
On 3/1/16 2:34 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> Does anyone know where to look for things like this?
Just a guess, but maybe it tries IPv6 first and fails and prints that
error, but then tries IPv4 and succeeds?
Lewis
Hi,
I use Alpine as mailclient on a Digital PWS600au with NetBSD 7.0. When
accessing my mailboxes (a couple of IMAP mailboxes, including my own
ISP, and at Yahoo and Google), I always get an error of which I can't get
rid of: "Can't connect to imap.isp.com,993: No route to host". But after
th
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:54:49PM +0330, Mohammad Badie Zadegan wrote:
> I set vesa 0x118 mode in boot prompt and I saw the boot process was change
> visiblity to new mode but still errored me (EE) No Device detected.
> BTW, I didn't use current version.
> Is that I must use current version for v
I haven't gone so far as to try Linux emulation or running a Linux
instance under QEMU to get Chromium, but it would be nice to have it
under NetBSD. One less reason to run Linux. I've noticed for some
time that there has been an ancient version of Chromium under
pkgsrc-wip. Just now, I noticed
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016, Mayuresh wrote:
What doesn't change is, whether you like it or not, you have no option
but to work with such websites. Well, had that not been the case I'd use
elinks almost everywhere...
I feel the same way. I've used Chrome enough on other platforms to see
that it's cle
Hello,
Please allow me clarify many fallacies in your mail. For one, labelling this as
souped up python script is simply incorrect. One git clones this project which
is not very different from other OSS projects. Once setup, the script allow for
some autodetection (apache for instance) but you
Hi,
I am running 7.0 (full dmesg below) and I noticed that my video card has
bad performance and often worden its performance when e.g. browsing. I
noticed these errors in the console:
DRM error in intel_pipe_set_base: pin & fence failed
DRM error in intel_pipe_set_base: pin & fence failed
DR
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Martin Husemann wrote:
I am currently using free certificates from StartSSL.
Interesting that they even offer such a thing. I had to look them up.
I looked at letsencrypt, but I couldn't make any sense of it - can
somebody explain (from an admin point of view) how that is
Emmanuel Dreyfus writes:
> But I still have no explanation why the kernel got corrupted and if that
> problem could be more widespread. RAIDframe is probably innocent there,
> though.
In my experience, RAIDframe has always been innocent, and I've had a lot
of failing disks (due to having ~10 RA
m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) writes:
> Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>> > Should the disk content be exactly the same? Does it make sense to
>> > compare the whole 500 GB for differences?
>> After the first 64 blocks, yes, they should be identical, and yes it's a
>> good test.
>
> cmp -l produces
Frank Wille writes:
>> What does a "setkey -aD" output?
> No SAD entries. And no SPD entries either.
> I guess they would be added by the phase1-up script...?
In my experience, SPD entries are added outside of racoon to tell the
kernel that certain traffic should have IPsec protection.
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:07:58PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> | - 64 MB region at offset 498074652673 with many changes
> You have 500GB dives, right? So that is way out near the end.
> What number(s) of sectors do the drives report (should be in dmesg) ?
Yes, 500 GB disks, 1953525168 sectors.
Brett Lymn wrote:
> OK, does phase 2 actually complete?
I doubt that. Currently I'm not even sure whether phase 1 completes, because
the phase1-up script is never called. On the other hand the phase1-down
script is called, as soon as the connection is terminated.
> What does a "setkey -aD" outp
Date:Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:55:03 +0100
From:m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Message-ID: <1mjesf6.dj1fl5xzo35gm%m...@netbsd.org>
| - 64 MB region at offset 498074652673 with many changes
You have 500GB dives, right? So that is way out near the end.
What number(s) o
19 matches
Mail list logo
