On 2019-07-10 02:35, Greg Troxel wrote:
Mayuresh writes:
I have an smtp_header_check which adds Reply-To as the lists address
(quite contrary to yahoo's suggestion).
And contrary to IETF standards. Repent!
I know that there is always a debate about it, but I can't remember
seeing anything
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 08:35:10PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> https://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-still-harmful.html
Thanks. I understand and appreciate the write ups. Firstly, I'll try not
adding Reply-To and see if that accommodates yahoo.
Do you have any idea how easy is port it from Free or Dragonfly?
Mensagem Original
Ativo 9 de jul de 2019 16:14, Leonardo Taccari escreveu:
> Hello bmelo,
>
> bmelo writes:
>> Hi, is there any driver for AR9485 wifi? Or any current development on it?
>> Thanks.
>
> No, ATM neith
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 08:39:11PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
|mlel...@serpens.de (Michael van Elst) writes:
|> fr...@phoenix.owl.de (Frank Wille) writes:
|>>It appears as sd0 with a RAID partition in sd0a. How can I access an
|>>FFS partition inside the RAID without changing anything on that RAID
|
mlel...@serpens.de (Michael van Elst) writes:
> fr...@phoenix.owl.de (Frank Wille) writes:
>
>>It appears as sd0 with a RAID partition in sd0a. How can I access an FFS
>>partition inside the RAID without changing anything on that RAID disk?
I am assuming that this is raidframe and the original sy
Mayuresh writes:
> I am running a mailing list using postfix aliases.
>
> I find that it works fine with gmail users, but yahoo is rejecting mails
> (note: not marking spam, simply rejecting) with the reject message citing
> the following help URL:
>
> https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN7253
On 2019-07-09 13:25, Andrew Luke Nesbit wrote:
On 09/07/2019 09:09, Dan LaBell wrote:
And, Practical C Programming, Steven Oualline
(which I will part with in moment, and never really needed, but I will
still recommend it) because it contains every scold you would know by
heart,
if you learned
fr...@phoenix.owl.de (Frank Wille) writes:
>It appears as sd0 with a RAID partition in sd0a. How can I access an FFS
>partition inside the RAID without changing anything on that RAID disk?
You could create a RAID set that includes that disk and access the raidframe
device.
You could also calcula
Hello bmelo,
bmelo writes:
> Hi, is there any driver for AR9485 wifi? Or any current development on it?
> Thanks.
No, ATM neither athn(4) nor ath(4) supports them (AFAIK only FreeBSD
ath(4) supports that).
Hi, is there any driver for AR9485 wifi? Or any current development on it?
Thanks.
Hi,
I'm trying to save some data from a RAID system. I removed one disk from the
RAID1 and attached it via a SATA USB adapter on my workstation, where I
have the required analyzation tools.
It appears as sd0 with a RAID partition in sd0a. How can I access an FFS
partition inside the RAID without
I am running a mailing list using postfix aliases.
I find that it works fine with gmail users, but yahoo is rejecting mails
(note: not marking spam, simply rejecting) with the reject message citing
the following help URL:
https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN7253.html?guccounter=1
I am intrig
Recover from logical backup, if possible.
I was just imagining how management might prefer a candidate who
favors a RAID solution, simply because recovery or partial recovery
of backup, is known to be impossible, so that conversation doesn't
have to happen, every time,
something is deleted,
Testing the final product.
Especially, if you're considering, it scientifically, then operating
system is only half the architecture.
Since, you say project. then you can mean something that includes,
what would be an application on
on something like netbsd. Because netbsd and other unix l
I believe, UNIX, later, POSX, was, scientifically, designed to have
a few flaws, so that intermediate C programming would always be
desirable.
Once, you've mastered *File*OPS* , you can easily, add a
*massrename* , remove-eye-oh, or remove , to your command line path.
Here's a link to a tar of
On 09/07/2019 09:09, Dan LaBell wrote:
UNIX for Programmers, and Users, a Complete Guide.
(NOT THE 2nd edition, the 1st ) Graham Glass
Why do you like the 1st edition more than the 2nd?
I understand many reasons why an earlier edition is preferable. I have
several examples of titles too, whe
I think you should choose to buy from the Secondary Market.
Two books.
UNIX for Programmers, and Users, a Complete Guide.
(NOT THE 2nd edition, the 1st ) Graham Glass
(Really, I will never part with it, even though, it retailed for 40
dollars.)
And, Practical C Programming, Steven Oualline
(whi
17 matches
Mail list logo
