On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:01:55AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 05:25:33PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> > It will allow you to know if the problem is with the packages
>
> Let me begin with that hypothesis.
>
> I'll try to do binary installation of firefox52 on a qemu
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:42:58PM +0100, Bodie wrote:
> > A couple of more questions:
> >
> > 1. Which is the highest firefox version which is rust free? Is it 52
> > (may be that's why it's retained?)
Got a reference that says it's firefox 53 is highest without rust.
Hello,
wanted to bump up my question to see if anybody could help.
Also, if I may, I wanted to ask if this group is the right question
about using NetBSD as a development environment (using OpenJDK11 in my
case). Or if there are other forums more specialized for this topic.
thank you in
On 19.11.2020 19:31, Mayuresh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 05:25:33PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
It will allow you to know if the problem is with the packages
Let me begin with that hypothesis.
I'll try to do binary installation of firefox52 on a qemu instance.
Then
try to
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 05:25:33PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> It will allow you to know if the problem is with the packages
Let me begin with that hypothesis.
I'll try to do binary installation of firefox52 on a qemu instance. Then
try to build it by cutting down as many options as
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 05:46:53PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 05:38:20PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> > Patches were commited on 27 Aug 2019 by Robert Swindells, and we were at
> > 8.99 at this time.
>
> Ok, the pkg builder runs with a 9.0_STABLE userland, so
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 05:38:20PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> Patches were commited on 27 Aug 2019 by Robert Swindells, and we were at
> 8.99 at this time.
Ok, the pkg builder runs with a 9.0_STABLE userland, so it should have
those fixes. Maybe something in the firefox build system
On 19.11.2020 17:25, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 09:03:12PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 04:22:11PM +0100, Bodie wrote:
> > I still wish to know whether strtab errors are necessarily from the
> > pkg layer or is something in the base wrong - and in
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 05:04:42PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 09:03:12PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 04:22:11PM +0100, Bodie wrote:
> > > > I still wish to know whether strtab errors are necessarily from the
> > > > pkg layer or is something in
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 09:03:12PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 04:22:11PM +0100, Bodie wrote:
> > > I still wish to know whether strtab errors are necessarily from the
> > > pkg layer or is something in the base wrong - and in turn armv7.img is
> > > faulty.
>
> And any
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 04:22:11PM +0100, Bodie wrote:
> > I still wish to know whether strtab errors are necessarily from the
> > pkg layer or is something in the base wrong - and in turn armv7.img is
> > faulty.
And any comment / confirmation on this from anyone?
--
Mayuresh
On 19.11.2020 16:12, Mayuresh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 03:32:20PM +0100, Bodie wrote:
I do not know internals, but building those packages takes a lot of
time
on these platforms or somewhere in the chain wrong toolchain version
was
used so everything is possible.
Or because earm,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 03:32:20PM +0100, Bodie wrote:
> I do not know internals, but building those packages takes a lot of time
> on these platforms or somewhere in the chain wrong toolchain version was
> used so everything is possible.
>
> Or because earm, earmv6hf and evbarm does not have any
On 19.11.2020 10:54, Mayuresh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:14:29AM +0100, Bodie wrote:
And did you notice during those years how browsers requirements raised
regarding HW and got thin regarding range of supported OSs?
pkgsrc maintains older versions say firefox52 which helps.
They
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:14:29AM +0100, Bodie wrote:
> And did you notice during those years how browsers requirements raised
> regarding HW and got thin regarding range of supported OSs?
pkgsrc maintains older versions say firefox52 which helps.
raspbian has a custom build of FF which is
On 19.11.2020 09:24, Mayuresh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:27:22AM +0100, Bodie wrote:
Based on discussion on other list you were given tips what to do,
did you test them?
If there are any tips that I missed, please do point out.
[ If you are referring to a post that says my
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:27:22AM +0100, Bodie wrote:
> Based on discussion on other list you were given tips what to do,
> did you test them?
If there are any tips that I missed, please do point out.
[ If you are referring to a post that says my toolchain might be invalid,
I already pointed
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 02:18:26PM +1030, Brett Lymn wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 07:08:38AM +1030, Brett Lymn wrote:
> >
> > I will dig up the document I wrote about the setup. My fuzzy memory is
> > that there
> > were no hacks required.
>
> Little wonder my memory was fuzzy - I did this
18 matches
Mail list logo
