Re: How to see disk I/O per process in NetBSD?

2020-11-27 Thread Bodie
On 27.11.2020 13:45, Bartosz Maciejewski wrote: Hello, I will repost what I've wrote on reddits r/netbsd as there are no replys there, maybe here I will have more luck :) Is there any way to see which process is doing read and writes on file system? I know iostat, but it showin summary. For

Re: GeForce - double crash with nouveau (boot and X11)

2020-11-23 Thread Bodie
On 24.11.2020 02:14, Riccardo Mottola wrote: Hi all,, I got a used laptop and sadly it has a nvidia 7300 card  Sadly because I know they are troublesome - they work(ed) well on linux and freebsd until they stopped providing a current binary legacy driver, then you can trash it, apparently.

Re: Firefox alternatives with JS : luakit?

2020-11-23 Thread Bodie
On 23.11.2020 11:09, Sad Clouds wrote: On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 06:24:17 +0100 (CET) "Thomas Mueller" wrote: from Sad Clouds: > On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:29:27 +0530 > Mayuresh wrote: > > In the interim, would appreciate any feedback on luakit or other > > alternatives (with JS support). > x86

Re: Bump [q] gradle on NetBSD 9.1 (amd64) with OpenJDK 11 -- does not work

2020-11-22 Thread Bodie
well as Dtrace so not everything may be there https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/systems/hands-on-labs/hol-uncover-jdk8-secrets-dtrace-2798366.html On 2020-11-22 19:47, Bodie wrote: On 22.11.2020 06:56, ts1000 wrote: Hello, unfortunately I am not yet able to figure out what's wrong. I

Re: Bump [q] gradle on NetBSD 9.1 (amd64) with OpenJDK 11 -- does not work

2020-11-22 Thread Bodie
On 22.11.2020 06:56, ts1000 wrote: Hello, unfortunately I am not yet able to figure out what's wrong. I think there is something wrong with OpenJDK11 port for netbsd or some OS feature that it relies on, does not work as JDK 11 expects. I do not think there is a problem with Gradle, at all.

Re: Firefox alternatives with JS : luakit?

2020-11-22 Thread Bodie
On 22.11.2020 18:11, Mayuresh wrote: On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 03:46:37PM +0100, Riccardo Mottola wrote: Let me know if you want to play, help, try to compile it yourself or need a binary. Or maybe it could even go in pkgsrc I just tried *today* to compile on NetBSD/9.1 on my ThinkPad T30 (Pe

Re: Tunneling in NetBSD

2020-11-22 Thread Bodie
On 22.11.2020 15:41, Rhialto wrote: On Mon 16 Nov 2020 at 07:07:15 -0700, Andy Ruhl wrote: Just a general question to this thread: How do clients use OpenVPN? Do you have to install it, and is it widely available? My basic research suggests that most clients will have to install it. And is

Re: Bump - Non-functional xfreerdp2 on 8.1 STABLE - missing POSIX timer_create?

2020-11-21 Thread Bodie
On 17.11.2020 13:53, Uwe Klaus wrote: On Mon, 16 Nov 2020, Bodie wrote: original questions is now nearly one year old https://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-users/2019/12/10/msg029983.html There was no response and I can confirm that problem still exists on 9.1 stable amd64 and evbarm. Are

Re: Bump [q] gradle on NetBSD 9.1 (amd64) with OpenJDK 11 -- does not work

2020-11-21 Thread Bodie
On 21.11.2020 19:59, ts1000 wrote: Greg, Bodie thank you for suggesting to look for ktrace.out, after running: ktrace -i gradle status Indeed the dump was there. Now I know how to use ktrace, at least supreficially. I ran kdump on it, got an ASCII and started looking for abnormalities

Re: Bump [q] gradle on NetBSD 9.1 (amd64) with OpenJDK 11 -- does not work

2020-11-21 Thread Bodie
On 21.11.2020 19:59, ts1000 wrote: Greg, Bodie thank you for suggesting to look for ktrace.out, after running: ktrace -i gradle status Indeed the dump was there. Now I know how to use ktrace, at least supreficially. It's not a Linux. It's a BSD. Everything is in the syst

Re: Bump [q] gradle on NetBSD 9.1 (amd64) with OpenJDK 11 -- does not work

2020-11-20 Thread Bodie
On 21.11.2020 03:49, ts1000 wrote: Thank you for the follow up in regards to gradle on openjdk11 with NetBSD 9.1 0) Running NetBSD 9.1 amd64 within Virtual Box on windows host. Allocated to it the box 8gb and 4 cores the underlying disk (that vbox is using is an Intel SSD) 1) following you

Re: firefox52 core dump on RPI2 NetBSD9.1

2020-11-19 Thread Bodie
On 19.11.2020 19:31, Mayuresh wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 05:25:33PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: It will allow you to know if the problem is with the packages Let me begin with that hypothesis. I'll try to do binary installation of firefox52 on a qemu instance. Then try to build

Re: firefox52 core dump on RPI2 NetBSD9.1

2020-11-19 Thread Bodie
On 19.11.2020 17:25, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 09:03:12PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 04:22:11PM +0100, Bodie wrote: > > I still wish to know whether strtab errors are necessarily from the > > pkg layer or is something in the base wr

Re: firefox52 core dump on RPI2 NetBSD9.1

2020-11-19 Thread Bodie
On 19.11.2020 16:12, Mayuresh wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 03:32:20PM +0100, Bodie wrote: I do not know internals, but building those packages takes a lot of time on these platforms or somewhere in the chain wrong toolchain version was used so everything is possible. Or because earm

Re: firefox52 core dump on RPI2 NetBSD9.1

2020-11-19 Thread Bodie
On 19.11.2020 10:54, Mayuresh wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:14:29AM +0100, Bodie wrote: And did you notice during those years how browsers requirements raised regarding HW and got thin regarding range of supported OSs? pkgsrc maintains older versions say firefox52 which helps. They

Re: firefox52 core dump on RPI2 NetBSD9.1

2020-11-19 Thread Bodie
On 19.11.2020 09:24, Mayuresh wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:27:22AM +0100, Bodie wrote: Based on discussion on other list you were given tips what to do, did you test them? If there are any tips that I missed, please do point out. [ If you are referring to a post that says my

Re: firefox52 core dump on RPI2 NetBSD9.1

2020-11-18 Thread Bodie
On 19.11.2020 03:08, Mayuresh wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 08:32:42AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote: Is nobody else facing this problem? The image and packages both are downloaded from above locations, I have built nothing at my end. Have filed port-arm/55812. Request attention please. Stuck with

Re: Bump - Non-functional xfreerdp2 on 8.1 STABLE - missing POSIX timer_create?

2020-11-18 Thread Bodie
On 17.11.2020 18:06, nia wrote: I read the actual code that uses POSIX timers, it hasn't changed at all in the various release candidates. If you want to simulate building with POSIX timer support disabled, you can do the following: BUILDLINK_TRANSFORM+= rm:-DWITH_POSIX_TIMER Well but i

Re: Bump - Non-functional xfreerdp2 on 8.1 STABLE - missing POSIX timer_create?

2020-11-17 Thread Bodie
On 17.11.2020 18:16, Bodie wrote: On 17.11.2020 18:06, nia wrote: I read the actual code that uses POSIX timers, it hasn't changed at all in the various release candidates. It all started with this https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/issues/4592 If you want to simulate building

Re: Tunneling in NetBSD

2020-11-17 Thread Bodie
On 17.11.2020 21:58, Brett Lymn wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 03:50:21PM +0200, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: Greg Troxel wrote: > My suggestion is openvpn. [...] > You do need to set up certificates Not if you use the static key encryption mode. Whilst this is correct the OP did mention andr

Re: Bump - Non-functional xfreerdp2 on 8.1 STABLE - missing POSIX timer_create?

2020-11-17 Thread Bodie
On 17.11.2020 18:06, nia wrote: I read the actual code that uses POSIX timers, it hasn't changed at all in the various release candidates. It all started with this https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/issues/4592 If you want to simulate building with POSIX timer support disabled, you can do

Re: Bump - Non-functional xfreerdp2 on 8.1 STABLE - missing POSIX timer_create?

2020-11-17 Thread Bodie
On 17.11.2020 15:19, nia wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:22:24AM +0100, Bodie wrote: Works fine on FreeBSD and Linux obviously, on OpenBSD they keep back on RC version of freerdp2 as they do not have that timer_create() interface, but it works there too with same command The code in

Re: Bump - Non-functional xfreerdp2 on 8.1 STABLE - missing POSIX timer_create?

2020-11-17 Thread Bodie
On 17.11.2020 11:22, Bodie wrote: On 17.11.2020 10:48, Martin Husemann wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 09:32:39AM +0100, Bodie wrote: [09:28:48:378] [2337:82f08000] [ERROR][com.winpr.synch.timer] - InitializeWaitableTimer: os specific implementation is missing I don't get that, s

Re: Bump - Non-functional xfreerdp2 on 8.1 STABLE - missing POSIX timer_create?

2020-11-17 Thread Bodie
On 17.11.2020 10:48, Martin Husemann wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 09:32:39AM +0100, Bodie wrote: [09:28:48:378] [2337:82f08000] [ERROR][com.winpr.synch.timer] - InitializeWaitableTimer: os specific implementation is missing I don't get that, so the failure does not happen fo

Re: Bump - Non-functional xfreerdp2 on 8.1 STABLE - missing POSIX timer_create?

2020-11-17 Thread Bodie
On 17.11.2020 09:00, Martin Husemann wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 07:54:38PM +0100, Bodie wrote: [19:45:55:337] [2861:67ec4000] [ERROR][com.freerdp.core] - transport_read_layer:freerdp_set_last_error_ex ERRCONNECT_CONNECT_TRANSPORT_FAILED [0x0002000D] [19:45:55:358] [2861:67ec4000] [INFO

Re: Bump - Non-functional xfreerdp2 on 8.1 STABLE - missing POSIX timer_create?

2020-11-17 Thread Bodie
On 17.11.2020 09:00, Martin Husemann wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 07:54:38PM +0100, Bodie wrote: [19:45:55:337] [2861:67ec4000] [ERROR][com.freerdp.core] - transport_read_layer:freerdp_set_last_error_ex ERRCONNECT_CONNECT_TRANSPORT_FAILED [0x0002000D] [19:45:55:358] [2861:67ec4000] [INFO

Bump - Non-functional xfreerdp2 on 8.1 STABLE - missing POSIX timer_create?

2020-11-16 Thread Bodie
Hi all, original questions is now nearly one year old https://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-users/2019/12/10/msg029983.html There was no response and I can confirm that problem still exists on 9.1 stable amd64 and evbarm. Are developers at least aware that there is such problem and freerdp2 is n

Re: poor write performances with RAID 5 Raidframe

2014-11-29 Thread bodie
On 30.11.2014 00:18, Emile `iMil' Heitor wrote: Hi, I'm witnessing poor performances while writing to a RAID 5 Raidframe I setup to be my home NAS a couple of months ago. Following some documentations, tutorials, and mailing-list posts, I think I had everything aligned right as the followi

Re: Xorg applications take ages to load, unless started from xterm

2014-11-23 Thread bodie
On 23.11.2014 23:30, Ottavio Caruso wrote: Hello, this is a fresh installation of 6.1.5_PATCH on amd64. When I "startx", it takes ages to load the graphical environment, when I am in fluxbox and I launch applications from the menu, again it takes ages. However if I then launch applications