On 2018-09-20 20:50, jmitchel wrote:
On 2018-09-17 19:32, Tom Sweet wrote:
Greetings Jason:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 4:38 PM jmitchel wrote:
On 2018-09-06 16:21, jmitchel wrote:
Hello,
I know this is a somewhat annoying question, because it's very
broad
and the server's out of date, but am I
Greetings Jason:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 4:38 PM jmitchel wrote:
> On 2018-09-06 16:21, jmitchel wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I know this is a somewhat annoying question, because it's very broad
> > and the server's out of date, but am I going to get in trouble using
> > the version of BIND that came
On Thu 06 Sep 2018 at 17:29:28 -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> echo "qvt -p punbf -g gkg nhgubef.ovaq @fson.faf-co.vfp.bet.|terc Errq" |\
> tr "Enopqrstuvabcefghk" "Rabcdefghinoprstux"
Chaosnet isn't dead yet!
https://github.com/PDP-10/klh10/commit/678db7c80b589b1f3027f58e716d3df1d8607d7e
On 2018-09-06 18:29, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
I see you already found a newer version. Nearly all the many
vulnerabilities it has had over the past decade don't provide
privileged
access nor compromise the system beyond just crashing named. Maybe some
of your clients can be prompted to query your
I see you already found a newer version. Nearly all the many
vulnerabilities it has had over the past decade don't provide privileged
access nor compromise the system beyond just crashing named. Maybe some
of your clients can be prompted to query your named for known queries
that can crash it.
On 2018-09-06 16:21, jmitchel wrote:
Hello,
I know this is a somewhat annoying question, because it's very broad
and the server's out of date, but am I going to get in trouble using
the version of BIND that came with NetBSD 6.1.4. Here's the info:
Karma:/etc/namedb# uname -a
NetBSD Karma 6.1.4
Hello,
I know this is a somewhat annoying question, because it's very broad and
the server's out of date, but am I going to get in trouble using the
version of BIND that came with NetBSD 6.1.4. Here's the info:
Karma:/etc/namedb# uname -a
NetBSD Karma 6.1.4 NetBSD 6.1.4 (GENERIC) i386
