On 17/04/2020 19:44, ignat...@cs.uni-bonn.de wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:52:37AM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
I doubt they demand either.
You many not care about delivery to sites that do care but I've
certainly had e-mail bounced or classified as spam due to the lack of a
PTR reco
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:52:37AM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> At Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:14:30 +0200, ignat...@cs.uni-bonn.de wrote:
> Subject: Re: SMTP servers receiving from gmail
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:55:25PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
> > [Google "Mail&qu
At Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:14:30 +0200, ignat...@cs.uni-bonn.de wrote:
Subject: Re: SMTP servers receiving from gmail
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:55:25PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
> [Google "Mail"]
>
> > They demand DKIM or similar configurations, which I refuse to use,
>
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020, ignat...@cs.uni-bonn.de wrote:
> However, SPF seems
> to work to pacify Google and isn't very difficult to setup.
For many years, I periodically send emails using NetBSD.org address. I
didn't think about SPF.
I never get any bounces for this. Now I see the SPF rule in the T
On 16/04/2020 08:14, ignat...@cs.uni-bonn.de wrote:
It might help to have a PTR record for the smtp clients' outgoing address;
last time I had that problem with Google it had gone lost when switching
nameserver machines and the backup wasn't up-to-date. However, SPF seems
to work to pacify Goo
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:55:25PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
[Google "Mail"]
> They demand DKIM or similar configurations, which I refuse to use,
> because its a lot of work to configure, and it often doesn't even work
> with mail forwarding.
It might help to have a PTR record for the smtp clients' o
On 15/04/2020 21:55, Rhialto wrote:
On Tue 14 Apr 2020 at 18:44:54 +0100, Mike Pumford wrote:
I have the reverse problem, more or less. When sending mail to a google
server, it doesn't want to receive it. At least, when I'm using IPv6.
In the past, it helped to force it to use IPv4 instead, bu
On Tue 14 Apr 2020 at 18:44:54 +0100, Mike Pumford wrote:
> Just wanted to get this out there in case anyone else was being baffled by a
> similar problem and couldn't find any clues on google as its taken me nearly
> 2 weeks to figure this out :(
I have the reverse problem, more or less. When sen
I've been tracking a problem where my NetBSD SMTP server was unable to
receive e-mail from google getting failures reported as:
read error: FAILED_PRECONDITION: read error (0): error
Tracking it through with tcpdump showed that the google servers were
making the connection, doing the STARTTLS
