On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 02:18:59PM +, Todd Gruhn wrote:
> I want to to clean out crap that Microsoft forces on
> that drive.
>
> MS Windows want to stop me from "Uninstall" stuff that they
> installed...
>
> Can this be done with NetBSD?
"yes" - in several variants.
You can wipe the
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 02:05:23PM +, Todd Gruhn wrote:
> S -- not do-able?
What is the exact question? I can't parse the request.
Martin
On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 03:14:54PM -0700, Stephen Medina wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was in the middle of my first install, about to partition my
> drive, when sysint terminated with the error "screen too
> narrow for menu". I am using one of those old square LCD
> monitors. Is there a way around
On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 08:16:18AM +, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> [ 3574.054462] iwi0: autoconfiguration error: fatal error
The message is bogus, it has nothing to do with autoconfiguration.
"Fatal error" is a bit in the interrupt cause register of the intel
chipset. The driver can not do
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 12:51:19PM +, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> I'just doing a git clone or a git pull... so don't blame "me".
> At most git.. or its NetBSD compilation.
I have never seen that (neither on 10.0 nor on -current). It is very
hard to tell what causes the errors for you. Two
On Sun, May 05, 2024 at 09:10:36PM +0200, Taryel Hlontsi wrote:
> Then I had to make a device node:
>
> mknod /dev/vio9p0 c 356 0
>
> where 356 is a major number of the device I found in
> /usr/src/sys/conf/majors
The official way is something like:
cd /dev && sh MAKEDEV vio9p0
(so
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 12:20:45PM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> still it would be nice to understand what changes Solaris was doing which
> disturb NetBSD.
Yes (but it sounds like it is a bug Solaris).
> I don't think NetBSD should crash...
Only if the file system passes a fsck_msdos(8).
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 08:12:06PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 08:04:28PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
> > I filed http://gnats.netbsd.org/58146 for it.
>
> Why do you think those issue are related? Sounds very unlikely to me.
To ellaborate on this:
- the
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 08:04:28PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
> I filed http://gnats.netbsd.org/58146 for it.
Why do you think those issue are related? Sounds very unlikely to me.
Martin
On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 05:08:04PM +, xuser wrote:
> This is as much as a I can give you
> It say some thing about invalid fats
> i cant see much because the screen go blank
> As for the core dump i don't have enough swap space
Can you provdie an image of a filesystem that shows this bug?
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:25:09PM +, xuser wrote:
> Netbsd crashes when using fat that solaris 10 has modified.
Can you give any details (e.g. the exact kernel output from the crash),
provide a copy of the "modified" filesystem, or the kernel crash dump?
Martin
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 07:12:16PM +, Arvind wrote:
> Sure, was just using the linux remote unlock as an example of what
> we're trying to get configured (after encrypting the root partition
> with passphrase unlock). Any help from the group would be much
> appreciated.
It should be
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 05:04:06PM -0400, MLH wrote:
> Same :
> inet6 fe80:: (redacted but looks good)
Link local address.
> inet6 ::1000/128 flags 0
Bogus.
> dhcpcd issued a bunch of ipv6 stuff on startup that indicated all
> was fine but it didn't go into dmesg or a logfile that I can find
>
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 06:04:23PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> Apparently I need to "purchase an inexpensive OATH TOTP compatible
> token device."
>
> $ wtf oath
> wtf: I don't know what `oath' means!
> $ wtf totp
> TOTP: time-based one time password
>
> Any suggestions on something that
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 03:17:14PM +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
> However, while better checking of trust anchors is a better end state
> - assuming I am understanding the situation correctly: in an
> effectively unannounced change, pkgin on a -9 system without either
>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 01:20:12PM +, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> /dev/sd0e /media/usb msdos rw 0 0
What is that partition?
Is that "usb" device available (as sd0) during your upgrade experiment?
If you boot the installer from a USB disk, that might become sd0 and
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:46:30AM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> On https://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/evbarm/
> Select NetBSD/evbarm 10.0 INSTALL notes
> Produces Error 404.
Fixed, thanks!
Martin
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:52:04PM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> 0: NetBSD (sysid 169)
> bootmenu: NetBSD
> start 2048, size 625140400, Active
> 1:
> 2:
> 3:
> Bootselector disabled.
> First active partition: 0
Can you show us the /etc/fstab file from the NetBSD partition?
Martin
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:42:22PM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Your explanation sounds plausible.
> However, "UEFI Boot Mode" is disabled in BIOS, I don't know if it is still
> used by the CD or "detected" somehow anyway.
>
> How can I tell further?
Can you boot the original install CD you
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 10:28:46PM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> So I have a perfect working 9.3 installation on on an HP ProBook laptop.
> I boot the CD which works fine
Try the BIOS-only install image instead - I bet your system boots the
CD via UEFI, but the original installation was BIOS
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 02:15:30PM +0100, Chris Pinnock wrote:
>
>
> > On 8 Apr 2024, at 10:11, Todd Gruhn wrote:
> >
> > Is there a better way to config a netbsd kernel.
> >
> > GENERIC is getting so big.
>
> In arch/*/conf you can copy the GENERIC kernel config file and edit the new
>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 12:56:29PM +, Derrick Lobo wrote:
> When I choose system drive during upgrade the upgrade takes long i.e 25 to 45
> minutes
>
> However if I choose the actual drive then its done in less than 5 minutes..
> so I will use the actual drive going further
Sorry, I fail
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:06:42PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> So:
>
> - this was thought about and believed within the rules
> - I should just delete the destdir and continue
> - we believe that I will then have no problems
Yes!
(If this would cause problems, you had them before but
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 03:46:21PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Or, do we claim that these libs are private to bind, and thus this is
> not an ABI change?
We do, but it is phishy. There was a recent discussion to move it to
some more private directory like /usr/lib/bind/lib*.so (especially to
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 10:32:53PM +0900, Henry wrote:
> In order to test NetBSD-10.0, I copied the latest kernel to the root
> directory of a [partially] working NetBSD-9.3 system. Absolutely
> fantastic: super fast boot-up, AND the '/sbin/shutdown -p' glitch with
> the 9.x series is fixed!
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 10:05:42AM -0400, Justin Parrott wrote:
> pkgsrc-changes@ is driving me nuts. How do you feel about it?
Why are you subscribed to that list if you are not interested in
the details there?
Martin
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 02:02:44AM +, Derrick Lobo wrote:
> Here are the details. Has anyone else experience this issue
> netbsd 9.0
> time cat /mnt/amd64/binary/sets/base.tarxz > /dev/null
> 5.65s real 0.00s user 0.06s system
>
> netbsd 10rc5
> time cat /mnt/amd64/binary/sets/base.tarxz >
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 01:31:26PM +, Derrick Lobo wrote:
> I have reproduced this issue on multiple servers with the following
> cpus using the amd64 USB image on all of them takes 20 to 45 minutes
> which normally on netbsd9 took 3 minutes max to complete the USB
> install. None of our
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 03:59:10PM +, Derrick Lobo wrote:
> wm0: flags=0x8843 mtu 1500
[..]
> inet6 fe80::ec4:7aff:fe33:2c6c%wm0/64 flags 0 scopeid 0x1
> inet 192.168.60.238/24 broadcast 192.168.60.255 flags 0
> inet 192.168.60.189/24 broadcast 192.168.60.255 flags 0
>
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 08:18:14PM +, Derrick Lobo wrote:
> Hi Thierry
>
> Manual untar seems fine no issues at all. This seems more like
> copying the file between usb to the local drive as I see stalls when
> the file is copied over
But you said the time was spent in the download mostly -
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 03:52:15PM +, Derrick Lobo wrote:
> I ended just untaring the sets and running etcupdate as that was much
> quicker
Huh? If that was much quicker (you were running the same kernel, from the
install image?) - where did the upgrade spend all the additional time?
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:40:15PM +, Derrick Lobo wrote:
> I have noticed the USB install taking way too long anyone else noticed it
On what hardware?
This may depend on (a) the target disk [e.g. new driver bugs making writes
slow] or (b) the USB stick and what controller it is pluged in
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 07:04:39PM +, Mike Pumford wrote:
> Something slightly off in a set definition?
Yes (for builds without MKDEBUG=yes). Should be fixed now.
Martin
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 10:39:36AM +0100, Fekete Zoltán wrote:
> Hi There!
>
> I have played with GNU as and ld, and subsequently created a "Hello World!"
> program, which I could not find anywhere else so far.
There are examples (including x86_64 and i386) installed in
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 12:06:51PM +0100, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I started playing tweaking usbdevs file in the Intel Nuc 8i7BEH
> NetBSD-10_RC3 amd64- I added the line:
>
> product REALTEK RTL8188FTV 0xf179 RTL8188FTV
You need to regnerate a few files after changes in
On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 07:18:57PM +0100, Fekete Zoltán wrote:
> ... boot device: wd0
> ... root on wd0c dumps on wd0b
> ... vfs_mountroot: can't open root device
> ... cannot mount root, error = 6
> ... root device (default wd0c):
wd0c sounds unlikely for / - can you try answering wd0a at the
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:16:16AM +0100, Kirill Miazine wrote:
> Step 3 has to be a different one: load if_wg module, to make sure wg is
> listed as a clonable interface.
Yes, indeed, and it is slightly subtle (auto-hiding by module auto-loading).
I have all my router kernels running securelevl
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:23:11AM +0100, Kirill Miazine wrote:
> Does your custom kernel provide some wg devices initially?
No, but "ifconfig -C" lists wg as a clonable device, so /etc/ifconfig.wg0
is loaded.
Martin
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 09:27:59AM +0100, Kirill Miazine wrote:
>
> Yet for some reason mine isn't being picked up -- even if I use wg0 instead
> of wg1.
Oh, sorry - I forgot the obvious part: you need to make sure your kernel
has wg(4) support - it is not part of GENERIC on most architectures
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 08:46:11AM +0100, Kirill Miazine wrote:
> Hi, NetBSD users
>
> I've been setting up a NetBSD box, which has to be connected to the wider
> WireGuard network. There's a while since I managed NetBSD, so I'd like to
> ask for feedback as to whether current setup is considered
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 10:30:51AM -0600, Robert Nestor wrote:
> Maybe it?s just me, but putting an announcement of the availability
> of a Release Candidate at the top of the NetBSD Home Page without
> having a link to where it can be found seems highly inconvenient.
Not "without", but slightly
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:43:56PM +, Liam Proven wrote:
> You don't write an image to anything. You copy a file. It's a normal
> FAT32 filesystem with as many ISO files as will fit and it generates a
> boot menu on the fly every boot. It works on x86-32, x86-64, BIOS and
> UEFI.
The web page
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:22:31AM -0500, Todd Gruhn wrote:
> > The correct size is "not on its own partition". Why not have /var
> > along with / on the same filesystem?
>
> Thanks -- /var on wd0e was given to me -- by install.sh
What is install.sh?
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 9:54?AM xuser
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 11:58:08AM +0100, Ede Wolf wrote:
> Btw, this does not seem to be alpha-port specific. I've just tried to
> compile on amd64 for amd64, exactly the same mk.conf (with the obvious
> exception of CPUFLAGS) and of course changing -a and -m for build.sh:
As Robert noted, it is
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 09:47:21AM +0100, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote:
> Smart move and great initiative! Please do send patches to
> tech-k...@netbsd.org in order for the developers working with drmkms
> to see them and, hopefully, apply them to the cvs sources.
Adding them to the PR is good
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 04:21:01PM +0100, Ede Wolf wrote:
> My build says somethig different about warnings and errors (Marking by me,
> of course):
>
> /data/src/crypto/external/bsd/libsaslc/lib/../dist/src/crypto.c: In function
> 'saslc__crypto_md5_hex':
>
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 12:00:10PM +0100, Ede Wolf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just trying to crosscompile world, which fails with crypto not being able to
> be build, as MD5 is claimed to not be supported by openssl3.
> Is it just me or is anything known? cvs updated just an hour or so ago:
>
>
>
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 12:48:47PM +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> I have done a mistake this morning. I have replaced /netbsd kernel and
> copied /netbsd into /netbsd.old (thus, I have deleted my -10-beta
> kernel) but I'm pretty sure my -10-beta was built less that three months
> ago.
I
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 10:59:14PM +0100, Tobias Nygren wrote:
> I suspect the regression originates with an acpica update and some
> firmware bug might be a prerequisite to trigger it.
There have been no acpica updates on the -10 branch.
Martin
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 08:14:32PM +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> If I restart this server with a -10.0-Beta kernel, faulty ethernet
> adapter is autoconfigured without trouble.
Can you give more details of that kernel? Ideally source update time,
or kernel build time? That way we can narrow
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 06:03:56PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> To do better I think I'd go with an implementation of ntpd on a
> microcontroller
> (maybe an ESP32, which has native ethernet) and use the PPS signal with a
> capture channel. Doing true real time on more complex CPUs is really
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 01:02:12PM +0100, Ede Wolf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am heading for my first cross compile, but reading chapter 33 or man
> make/release, I am having one principal problem of understanding:
>
> Of course, if I have a central machine to cross compile for different hosts,
> I
On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 09:24:59PM +, Todd Gruhn wrote:
> Iread that NetBSD-10.0.?RC was coming out at end of October.
> It is now November.
It was delayed a tiny bit by another openssl+openssh update, but will
happen over this weekend.
Martin
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 07:09:25PM +0200, Dennis Dingeldein wrote:
> My problem now is, on that 1.5.3 installation, there is no fdisk and no
> mkfs. I checked the installations tgz files located here
> https://archive.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-archive/NetBSD-1.5.3/vax/binary/sets/,
> but these also do
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 01:20:19AM +0500, Vitaly Shevtsov wrote:
> Why is ssh linked with libsqlite.so?
I think this comes from heimdal, the Kerberos implementation we use, to
support authentication via GSSAPI.
Martin
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 05:00:07PM -0600, Brook Milligan wrote:
> Is there a way to control the video resolution on the console of a NetBSD
> machine? Is that controlled by the kernel somehow?
This depends on the architecture you are using, the boot method and the
framebuffer device.
If you
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 06:54:36PM +0200, Ede Wolf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> not sure, wether this is the proper list, but I am having a cubietruck, that
> hasn't seen much love lately, and while trying to fix this with an upgrade,
> I am running into problems.
> sysupgrade fails, because an image it
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:31:45PM -0600, Brook Milligan wrote:
> I'll submit a PR; what category?
Definitively hardware specific, so port-arm.
> - When the kernel boots into multiuser, run cu as
>
> # cu -l /dev/tty01
You mean /dev/dty01 here? Is 01 the correct number (you should check
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 09:50:59AM +0200, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> I suspect a mistake in npf kernel support introduced by last patches.
The change is explained in PR 56990. If you think it broke previously
correct and working configurations, please reply to the PR.
Thanks,
Martin
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 11:15:48PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> A better solution would probably be to simply set up all
> possible boot methods (for the way the system is being
> configured) without caring which method happened to be
> used to boot the install image.
Yes, ideally.
But that will
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 02:14:26PM -0400, salqu...@duck.com wrote:
> Previously I did not select this option ?preconfigured ?wedges?? because it
> says - preconfigured ?wedges? dk(4) in my case, and dk4 is not the NetBSD
> partition, it is a Linux swap partition. However, you are right that it
>
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 12:34:26PM -0400, salqu...@duck.com wrote:
> $ dkctl wd0 listwedges
>
> /dev/rwd0: 6 wedges:
> dk0: EFI System Partition, 409600 blocks at 40, type: msdos
> dk1: 82b9223d-b27d-504a-8ea9-693104c2edb5, 209715200 blocks at 411648, type:
> ffs
> dk2:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 04:33:49PM +0200, bsdprg wrote:
> NetBSD 9.x sysinst correctly identifies the NetBSD wedge and allows me to
> install 9.x on it.
> NetBSD 10.x sysinst does not show me the option to install on this wedge.
> Instead it shows only the full disk options and one EFI partition
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 08:39:11AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> So it seems the installer detected that it booted from mbr instead of
> UEFI and set up MBR probably gptboot and skipped the EFI gpt partition.
> Maybe I'm over-assuming.
Yes, the installer (on x86) uses machdep.bootmethod to decide
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 07:04:01PM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote:
> A real example is doing a -j 8 kernel build. Up in the top of top(1),
> I see global CPU usage in the high 90%. Down in the process list, I
> see a few processes in the 1-10% range that do not add up to 800%. I
> see some of the
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 02:13:12PM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote:
> When running something heavy yet ephemeral like a parallel make, I can
> see expected CPU usage in the summary or per-cpu view. However, I
> rarely see the process(es) consuming the CPU momentarily during the
> update intervals
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 09:05:22PM +0800, ykla wrote:
> I encountered a problem when installing netbsd+kde4. I can enter the kdm
> interface, but after entering the password and pressing enter, the screen
> goes black and I can only see the mouse cursor.
This means your session did not run and
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 05:18:04PM -0400, MLH wrote:
> port-amd64/56987 - non-critical medium priority sw-bug
> Certain usb devices can no longer be mounted on -current
>
> I posted it over a year ago but no action yet.
"No action" is not quite correct. No solution certainly.
This is
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:51:48PM +0100, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> So you can't modload if_wg on aarch64 at any time? It has to be in
> /etc/modules.conf ?
That depends on whether you run with kern.securelevel > 0, which I do,
and probably many evbarm kernels will do too by default.
Martin
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:36:14PM +0100, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> But you have to add 'pseudo-device wg' to you kernel configuration -
> it is not on by default:
Yeah, that is what my garbled "you might, or load the module..." part
was trying to say.
You have the choice: build a custom kernel
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 05:10:42PM +0200, logothesia wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> What does the landscape look like regarding WireGuard? Is it supported at
> all?
In -10 and -current it is. I am using it on several machines (mostly with
windows peers).
> ifconfig. It is my understanding that
On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 10:30:26PM -0400, cyrus torros wrote:
> Hi, I am trying to install Netbsd 10 on a eufi machine. a ryzen b450
> motherboard with a ryzen 5 2600 in it.
>
> It has currently a m2/nvme drive in it that has windows installed on it,
> complete with all the crap that comes with a
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 01:14:23AM -0400, cyrus torros wrote:
> i am using an amd ryzen b450 tomahawk and m2 nvme ssd if that at all
> matters, i have no clue how to get the core dump off this without crashing.
We need more details, for a start: which version are you trying to install
and what is
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 04:27:49PM +, adr wrote:
> Why is ctwm duplicated in src and xsrc?
It is not. There are only makefiles for it in src, while the source
is in xsrc ;-)
Martin
On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 06:36:05PM +, adr wrote:
> There is no makefile there, but I tried in case bsdmake
> imports the necessary files:
The official way to compile only this (but it assumes everything in xsrc
has been build before!) is something like:
cd src/external/mit/ctwm
On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 01:24:52PM +0200, Sijmen J. Mulder wrote:
> - No EFI boot entry is created by systinst and the BOOTIA32.EFI and
>BOOTX64.EFI files are placed in \EFI\BOOT, which can conflict with
>other OSes. I think they would be better placed in \EFI\NetBSD or
>such.
We
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 08:04:40PM +, Todd Gruhn wrote:
> So I read about NetBSD-10.0 BETA -- will there be a 10.0.1 version
> comming?
10.0_BETA will become 10.0_RC1 (once the blockers listed at
https://wiki.netbsd.org/releng/netbsd-10/ are mostly resolved)
and then 10.0.
After that
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 05:04:03PM +0200, Johan Stenstam wrote:
> Yes, I saw that when reading docs. But that prompts the obvious
> followup question, especially given Matthias question to me about
> trying BIOS-booting my system. Is there any way to change from UEFI
> boot to BIOS boot without
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 12:56:57PM +0200, Johan Stenstam wrote:
> I'm a dinosaur from the pre-UEFI era, all I know is 'BIOS boot'. How
> do I find that out?
sysctl machdep.bootmethod
will tell you. It is completely unrelated to GPT vs. MBR, NetBSD can work with
GPT both on BIOS and UEFI
On Sat, Apr 01, 2023 at 11:28:39PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> Is it possible to use NetBSD's native compiler for this scenario (C
> sources and .so files that come with Vivado, meant for Linux)? (It doesn't
> work. I'll post errors if this is supposed to work.)
No (or at least it is probably the
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 02:45:46AM +, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> [3] If you use FIDO-with-PIN instead of password+FIDO for anything,
> then the FIDO key does become a single point of failure -- and the
> compatibility and user experience is worse. So I advise you avoid
> that.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 09:51:17AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> It looks like the Yubikey 5 might fit the bill.
I am totally happy with my Yubikey and its usage in NetBSD and Firefox
(but I use 10_BETA and -current, though that probably only makes a difference
for the ssh usage).
I am regularily
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 08:04:53AM -0400, Todd Gruhn wrote:
> Because our time (in spring) changed from 6:00am ---> 7:00am.
No need to do anything, if you have set the correct timezone it
should adjust for DST automatically.
> I was hoping NetBSD would just take to a server to get latest time,
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 09:34:05AM +0900, Henry wrote:
> o can I create a NetBSD bootable micro SD card, or does one have to
> use Debian or Android on these A-20 Olimex SBCs?
We create SD card images for you: armbsd.org.
Just copy the proper image to the sd card and you should be ready to boot.
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 12:40:57PM +0100, Benny Siegert wrote:
> All of these are well-supported by NetBSD. I don't know how well
> supported the newest generation is, notably the Quartz64.
I run a Quartz64 Model B in production (using netbsd-10). It is great,
only downside is that the hardware
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:20:07AM +0100, Benny Siegert wrote:
> All this to say: if you want faster Firefox, ultimately you need to
> look into making Rust run faster on NetBSD.
I don't buy that. Most of firefox performance is totally unrelated
to compiler efficiency of neither Rust nor the C++
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 12:52:13PM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> > Now, of course, wouldn't be nice if 'umount' said something like "hey
> > dude! you're in the directory you're trying to umount."
>
> That's what e.g. "fstat /a" can tell you.
Indeed, and that gives you full information - a
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 06:43:32AM -0600, Robert Nestor wrote:
> Yes it is, but getting a dmesg during the failure seems to be
> difficult since I haven?t seen a failure when booting with serial
> console and most of the details of the failure scroll off the screen
> before the boot crashes.
We
On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 02:07:04PM -0600, Robert Nestor wrote:
> Be happy to try and provide more info if someone has suggestions.
Is this the same machine as in https://gnats.netbsd.org/56737 ?
As Rin asked there: we need the full dmesg output of the machine.
Martin
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 02:48:25PM +0500, Dmitrii Postolov wrote:
> Hi to All! Sorry for my bad English...
>
> $ uname -a
> NetBSD aspire9.localnet 10.0_BETA NetBSD-10.0_BETA (GENERIC) #0: Fri Dec 23
> 12:41:20 +05 2022
>
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 06:05:18PM +, r0ller wrote:
> exactly) I deleted occassionally. By the way, it's not only good for
> image files and although the current version needs a small patch (can't
> recall, just a one liner) but it can be built from source.Nevertheless,
> the question is:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 04:26:19PM +, Todd Gruhn wrote:
> When will NetBSD-10.* come out. I was told Jan 2023.
That would be slightly optimistic, first 10.0 BETA builds are just arriving.
> Any specific dateset?
Not yet.
Martin
On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 08:17:46PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> Thanks. If I got it right from one of your replies, -current installer is
> not recommended to install 9.2/9.3 sets. Right?
Yes, that will not work very well. I didn't test the netbsd-9 installer
because I didn't have it handy, but will
On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 09:32:56AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> That sounds like a bug.
I just tested with the installer from -current and a fake setup trying
to mimic parts of your environment. I used labels for the NetBSD partitions
to make their identification easier later.
Before:
#
On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 12:10:02PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> > 2) install (e.g. from the USB install image) by selecting "preconfigured
> > wedges (dk(4))" in the target disk selection and picking the root
> > partition you added in (1)
I forgot - this is slightly different in -current,
On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 08:37:33AM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> On the same disk I have Void Linux and Windows installations.
The installer is not very smart when you create multi-boot installations
(unless you have a disk per OS).
I would not go via the VM detour, but instead:
1) add partition(s)
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:13:07PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> But it says
>
> error: no suitable video mode found
> Booting in blind mode
That is a message from grub, not from any part of NetBSD.
Martin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 07:31:21PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> How about using sysinst installer from current and installing sets from
> 9.3 distribution? Is this something workable?
Better use a 9.3_STABLE version from
https://nycdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/netbsd-9/latest/
This has all the
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:17:22PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> /dev/sda1 is EFI partition. There is Windows on /dev/sda3 and Linux on
> /dev/sda6.
>
> NetBSD is on what appears as /dev/sda8 here (ignore its type above, above
> is a snapshot before NetBSD was installed). It appeared as /dev/dk7 with
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 08:59:36PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> I don't find uefi image for NetBSD 9.3 amd64 I assume the release image is
> already the integrated one.
Yes, there is a common image now that should work on all "newer" machines
in either BIOS or UEFI boot mode.
> I did the
1 - 100 of 668 matches
Mail list logo
