On Dec 14, 2007 11:09 PM, Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct, absolutely no traffic. So if it works for you, then either
it's something that got fixed between -rc3 and -rc5, or something odd
when I did a make oldconfig, I
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
Interesting approach, but I think there is limited value to this
(arguably) complex form.
The core issue is that the data and the SACK state are maintained in
the same datastructure. The complexity in all the state management
and fixups in your
On Friday 14 December 2007 14:51, I wrote:
On Friday 14 December 2007 07:39, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Note that false sharing of slab pages is still possible between two
unrelated writeout processes, both of which obey rules for their own
writeout path, but the pinned combination does not. This
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:29:28PM +0100, Bernard Pidoux wrote:
Hi,
This patch cancels a circular locking conflict that appeared with a timeout
of an AX25 connection.
signed off by Jarek Poplawski
One spurious space less here, and maybe a few more words to the changelog.
Regards,
Jarek P.
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 03:19:43 +0100, Holger Hoffstaette wrote:
I have now gone back to enable TSO since vsftp with sendfile really seems
to be the only app that causes this. I have simply set it to
use_sendfile=NO and no corruption occurs at all; the machine is stable and
fast.
In the good
Eric Dumazet wrote, On 12/14/2007 10:37 PM:
Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
Eric Dumazet wrote, On 12/14/2007 12:09 PM:
...
+ /*
+* Instead of returning hash % ht-cfg.size (implying a divide)
+* we return the high 32 bits of the (hash * ht-cfg.size) that will
+* give results
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:10:21 +0800 Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:44:18PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
That sounds like a bug in mutex_trylock() to me.
I was relying on
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2007/9/28/325129
which seems
Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
Eric Dumazet wrote, On 12/14/2007 10:37 PM:
Jarek Poplawski a écrit :
Eric Dumazet wrote, On 12/14/2007 12:09 PM:
...
+ /*
+* Instead of returning hash % ht-cfg.size (implying a divide)
+* we return the high 32 bits of the (hash * ht-cfg.size)
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:58:24 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 6:36 PM, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:13:21 -0500
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Andrew, I don't know who to forward this problem to.
I tried
Check pci_register_driver() error and clean up debugfs entries
if error happened.
Cc: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/sky2.c |9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: 2.6-git/drivers/net/sky2.c
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 02:48:10AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
When Eric said
Way way deep in mutex debugging on the slowpath there is a unreadable
and incomprehensible WARN_ON in muxtex_trylock that will trigger if
you have 10 tons of debugging turned on, and you are in,
interrupt
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:44:26 +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:
Holger Hoffstaette [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...]
Maybe turning off sendfile or NAPI just lead to random success - so far
it really looks like tso on the r8169 is the common cause.
TSO on the r8169 is the magic switch but the regression
Ob Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:17:23AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
Never mind, we already have that in local_t and as Alexey correctly
points out, USER is still going to be the expensive variant with the
preempt_disable (well until BH gets threaded). So how about this patch?
I didn't hear any
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 07:10:45PM -0500, Hideo AOKI wrote:
Because we have to call wmem_schedule function in ip_append_data()
which is used by several protocols both stream and datagram.
I just thought adding the sk_wmem_schedule() was only way to call
proper function from ip_append_data().
On Dec 14, 2007 11:10 PM, Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 05:47:22PM -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
I'm guessing if we go back to using a write-lock for bond-lock this
will go back to working again, but I'm not totally convinced since there
are plenty of places
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 12:15:04AM -0500, Hideo AOKI wrote:
This patch includes changes in network core sub system for memory
accounting.
Memory scheduling, charging, uncharging and reclaiming functions are
added. These functions use sk_forward_alloc to store socket local
accounting. They
Andrew Morton wrote, On 12/15/2007 12:13 PM:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:58:24 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 6:36 PM, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:13:21 -0500
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Pid: 6944, comm: cat Not tainted
Herbert Xu a écrit :
Ob Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:17:23AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
Never mind, we already have that in local_t and as Alexey correctly
points out, USER is still going to be the expensive variant with the
preempt_disable (well until BH gets threaded). So how about this patch?
I
Andrew Morton wrote, On 12/15/2007 12:13 PM:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:58:24 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I applied the patch and then tried my test again. This time my system
locked up.
Perhaps I should open a new thread for this, since the problem looks
pretty different.
* Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ob Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:17:23AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
Never mind, we already have that in local_t and as Alexey correctly
points out, USER is still going to be the expensive variant with the
preempt_disable (well until BH gets threaded). So
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 00:16 -0800, Ray Lee wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 11:09 PM, Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct, absolutely no traffic. So if it works for you, then either
it's something that got fixed between -rc3 and -rc5,
Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 15:35 -0800, Auke Kok wrote:
+printk(KERN_ERR /*/\n);
+printk(KERN_ERR Current EEPROM: 0x%04x\nCalculated: 0x%04x\n,
+ csum_old, csum_new);
Multiline printks need a KERN_level after every newline. Perhaps:
Hello,
As one of usual tests I run the following script:
for i in `find /proc -type f`; do
echo -n cat $i /dev/null ... ;
cat $i /dev/null;
echo done;
done
This time the culprit is /proc/net/packet. cat process gets killed
$ cat /proc/net/packet
Segmentation
Andy Gospodarek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you completely, Herbet, which is why I was surprised that
my first apparently did not resolve the issue. I felt it should
have
Did it change all occurrences of read_lock(bond-lock) to
read_lock_bh? If so I better look at the lockdep
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 06:03:19PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
How come you change SNMP_INC_STATS_USER() but not SNMP_INC_STATS() ?
Heh, my brain must have blocked me from seeing it because it's
too hard :)
Let's fix it the stupid way first and I'll do a local_t conversion
later.
[SNMP]: Fix
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 07:43:28PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
we could perhaps introduce stat_smp_processor_id(), which signals that
the CPU id is used for statistical purposes and does not have to be
exact? In any case, your patch looks good too.
Unfortunately that doesn't work because we
Mariusz Kozlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
git-ubi.patch
GOOD
#
git-net.patch
BAD
ipsec-fix-reversed-icmp6-policy-check.patch
but this seems to be far from precise :)
I suspect namespace borkage. But just because you pin-pointed
my patch I'll try to track it down :)
Cheers,
--
Visit
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My suspicion is that you've hit bad breakage in networking and lockdep just
isn't sufficiently robust to handle what it's being given.
Can you suggest a way in which others can reproduce this?
I can reproduce this now. I suspect it's to do with the
On Dec 15, 2007 9:27 PM, Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Gospodarek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you completely, Herbet, which is why I was surprised that
my first apparently did not resolve the issue. I felt it should
have
Did it change all occurrences of
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 10:17:35PM -0500, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
Not all of them in the bonding code, but all two of them in the small patch.
OK, we need to change all of the ones that may be called from
process context with BH on.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:07:07AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
I suspect namespace borkage. But just because you pin-pointed
my patch I'll try to track it down :)
Surprise surprise. The namespace seq patch missed two spots in
AF_PACKET.
[PACKET]: Fix /proc/net/packet crash due to bogus private
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 15:55:09 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 3:13 PM, Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 6:13 AM, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:58:24 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 14,
Jeff,
A few more fixes for 2.6.24...let me know if there are any problems!
Thanks,
John
P.S. The zd1211rw patch is already in netdev-2.6#upstream, but it
belongs in 2.6.24 as well.
---
Individual patches available here:
From: Hideo AOKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:07:44 -0500
Changelog take 9 - take 10:
* supported using sk_forward_alloc
* introduced several memory accounting functions with spin lock
* changed detagram receive functions to be able to customize
destructor
* fixed
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:44:18 -0800
That sounds like a bug in mutex_trylock() to me.
I disagree, I have yet to see a legitimate case where doing a trylock
on a mutex lock didn't turn out to be a bug when performed in an
atomic context.
This is
From: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:04:47 +0100
I prefer to let admins chose their size, since it makes attacker life more
difficult :)
For example, I can tell you I have a server, were size is between 2.000.000
and 3.500.000, I dont want to be forced to use
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:10:16 +0800
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 02:48:10AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Now as a separate issue we (ie: you) need to work out what _other_ things
you want ASSERT_RTNL to check apart from rtnl must be held.
Since we have now
At the end of partial delivery, we may have complete messages
sitting on the fragment queue. These messages are stuck there
until a new fragment arrives. This can comletely stall a
given association. When clearing partial delivery state, flush
any complete messages from the fragment queue and
The crc32c library used an identical table and algorithm
as SCTP. Switch to using the library instead of carrying
our own table. Using crypto layer proved to have too
much overhead compared to using the library directly.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 09:44:29PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
Such situations (ASSERT_RTNL() in atomic context) have always
been bugs though, and that continues to be true and I think
the check should be added somehow.
OK once I've fixed the set_multicast path I'll do an audit of
the existing
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:21:18AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
I can see where to filter these, but I am ignorant of how to
identify the socket policies. Are they just marked as sub-policies?
Jamal's going to hate me but setkey(8) already uses this so we're
stuck with it anyway.
The test
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:37:01 -0500 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
argh, please don't use linux-net. It's basically dead afaik.
Suitable ccs restored.
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:07:07AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
I suspect namespace borkage. But just because you pin-pointed
my
42 matches
Mail list logo
