From: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:53:47 -0500
Not sure if you got the PATCH 7/9 resend, but it looks like netdev ate that
too.
I made this patch set available here:
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vxy/lksctp-dev.git addip
I got the patch, there is
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 17:22 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Hi,
Another posting of the full swap over NFS series.
Andrew/Linus, could we start thinking of sticking this in -mm?
Two questions:
1 - what is the memory use impact on the system which don't do
From: Paul Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:29:31 -0500
The following patch is backed against David's net-2.6 tree and is pretty
trivial. I know we're late in the 2.6.24 cycle but I think this is worth
merging, if you guys don't feel that way let me know and I'll resubmit it
From: Paul Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:29:38 -0500
In several places the arguments to the xfrm_audit_start() function are in the
wrong order resulting in incorrect user information being reported. This
patch corrects this by pacing the arguments in the correct order.
From: Timo_Teräs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:10:41 +0200
From: Timo Teras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mac_header update in ipgre_recv() was incorrectly changed to
skb_reset_mac_header() when it was introduced.
Signed-off-by: Timo Teras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patch applied, thanks.
---
From: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:15:20 +0100
Pavel Emelyanov a écrit :
That's not truth, if I get you right. The __inet_hash() is called
with 0, from all the places except for the inet_hash() one.
OK, but on cases with 0, sk-sk_state is != TCP_LISTEN, unless
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:31:27 +0900), Satoru
SATOH [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
diff --git a/ip/iproute.c b/ip/iproute.c
index f4200ae..fa722c6 100644
--- a/ip/iproute.c
+++ b/ip/iproute.c
@@ -510,16 +510,16 @@ int print_route(const struct sockaddr_nl *who,
struct
On 20-12-2007 04:31, Satoru SATOH wrote:
ip route show does not print correct value when larger rto_min is
set (e.g. 3sec).
This problem is because of overflow in print_route() and
the patch below is a workaround fix for that.
...
--- a/ip/iproute.c
+++ b/ip/iproute.c
@@ -510,16 +510,16
Hello,
I have a short question regarding the net git tree and patches:
I want to write and send patches against the most recent and
bleeding edge kernel networking code.
I see in:
http://kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/?C=M;O=A
that there are 3 git trees which can be candidates for
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 08:18:23PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
Hi,
on Toradex' Colibri, a PXA270 based board with a DM9000 ethernet
controller, this driver won't work due to unsuitable DM9000_IRQ_FLAGS.
If I understood the code behind request_irq() correctly, it's not
recommended to register
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 02:41:53PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
Hi Remy,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:31:03PM +0100, Remy Bohmer wrote:
This controller is also used on many other boards, like the e.g. Atmel
AT91sam9261-ek board. On that board on both the rising _and_ falling
edge an interrupt
This one is used in quite many places in the networking code and
seems to big to be inline.
After the patch net/ipv4/build-in.o loses ~650 bytes:
add/remove: 2/0 grow/shrink: 0/5 up/down: 461/-1114 (-653)
function old new delta
__inet_hash_nolisten
The neigh_del_timer() looks sane - it removes the timer and
(conditionally) puts the neighbor. I expected, that the
neigh_add_timer() is symmetrical to the del one - i.e. it
holds the neighbor and arms the timer - but it turned out
that it was not so.
I think, that making them look symmetrical
David Miller writes:
Is the netif_running() check even required?
No, it is not.
When a device is brought down, one of the first things
that happens is that we wait for all pending NAPI polls
to complete, then block any new polls from starting.
Hello!
Yes but the reason was
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:20:26AM +0200, David Shwatrz wrote:
Hello,
I have a short question regarding the net git tree and patches:
I want to write and send patches against the most recent and
bleeding edge kernel networking code.
I see in:
Hello Ben,
Actually, the best way to go is to let the platform resources flags
decide about that with something like
resource-flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ | IRQT_RISING;
but the dm9000 does not care about them at all. Changing that would also
imply modifications to all board
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:20:26AM +0200, David Shwatrz wrote:
Hello,
I have a short question regarding the net git tree and patches:
I want to write and send patches against the most recent and
bleeding edge kernel networking code.
I see in:
I already sendout a correct patch last week. It should pre-increment.
Any hope getting it upstream?
--
Meelis Roos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.cs.ut.ee/~mroos/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
From: Robert Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:52:17 +0100
Yes but the reason was not to wait for all pending polls to
complete so a server/router could be rebooted even under high-
load and DOS. We've experienced some nasty problems with this.
I know, see the rest of the
From: Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:55:10 +0100
net-2.6.25.git = patches for current kernel release (only fixes)
net-2.6.git = patches for next kernel relase and planned to be
applied in next merge window
So net-2.6.git is the correct
From: Hideo AOKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:38:03 -0500
This patch introduces sndbuf size check before memory allocation for
send buffer.
signed-off-by: Satoshi Oshima [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signed-off-by: Hideo Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
diff -pruN
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
From: Ilpo_Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:46:33 +0200 (EET)
I'm not fully sure what's purpose of this code in tcp_write_xmit:
if (skb-len limit) {
unsigned int trim =
From: Hideo AOKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:38:17 -0500
Why do we need seperate stream and datagram accounting functions?
Is it just to facilitate things like the following test?
+static inline int sk_wmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int size)
+{
+ if (sk-sk_type ==
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:11:34PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Hi
The pneigh_lookup/delete silently concerns, that the
key_len of the table is more that 4 bytes. Look:
u32 hash_val = *(u32 *)(pkey + key_len - 4);
The hash_val for the proxy neighbor entry is four last
From: Hideo AOKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:38:47 -0500
This patch adds UDP memory usage accounting in IPv4.
Send buffer accounting is performed by IP layer, because skbuff is
allocated in the layer.
Receive buffer is charged, when the buffer successfully received.
From: Ilpo_Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:40:51 +0200 (EET)
[PATCH] [TCP]: Fix TSO deferring
I'd say that most of what tcp_tso_should_defer had in between
there was dead code because of this.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yikes!
John, we've
From: Ilpo_Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:40:51 +0200 (EET)
That's not the only case, IMHO if there's odd boundary due to
snd_una+snd_wnd - skb-seq limit (done in tcp_window_allows()), we don't
consider it as odd but break the skb at arbitary point resulting
two small
From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:34:09 -0800
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied to net-2.6.25
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:34:10 -0800
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied to net-2.6.25
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:34:06 -0800
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied to net-2.6.25
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:58:52 +0800
[SNMP]: Fix SNMP counters with PREEMPT
The SNMP macros use raw_smp_processor_id() in process context
which is illegal because the process may be preempted and then
migrated to another CPU.
This patch makes it use
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 10:30:25 +0800
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 06:03:19PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
How come you change SNMP_INC_STATS_USER() but not SNMP_INC_STATS() ?
Heh, my brain must have blocked me from seeing it because it's
too hard :)
Let's
On Thursday 20 December 2007 3:00:09 am David Miller wrote:
From: Paul Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:29:31 -0500
The following patch is backed against David's net-2.6 tree and is pretty
trivial. I know we're late in the 2.6.24 cycle but I think this is worth
merging,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, David Miller wrote:
From: Ilpo_Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:40:51 +0200 (EET)
That's not the only case, IMHO if there's odd boundary due to
snd_una+snd_wnd - skb-seq limit (done in tcp_window_allows()), we don't
consider it as odd but break
Hello,
I noticed the following message in my kernel log.
kernel: neigh: timer !nud_in_timer
(Might be due to a race condition.)
I'm running a UP Linux version 2.6.22.1-rt9
( http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php )
The following /proc entries might be relevant.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 03:22:58AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:55:10 +0100
net-2.6.25.git = patches for current kernel release (only fixes)
net-2.6.git = patches for next kernel relase and planned to be
On 19-12-2007 00:03, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
From:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426164
kernel version is 2.6.24-0.107.rc5.git3.fc9
From boot log on serial console:
(full log attached)
Added VLAN with VID == 2 to IF -:eth0.1568:-
Otherwise oops will happen if ethernet device has not been opened:
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x014c
Faulting instruction address: 0xc016f7f0
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
MPC85xx
NIP: c016f7f0 LR: c01722a0 CTR:
REGS: c79ddc70 TRAP:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:00:37AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
In the most ideal sense, tcp_window_allows() should probably
be changed to only return MSS multiples.
Unfortunately this would add an expensive modulo operation,
however I think it would elimiate this problem case.
Well you only
[speculation by network engineer -- not kernel hacker -- follows]
The router could be sooo crappy that it drops all packets from
TCP streams that have SACK enabled and the client has opened
200+ SACK connections previously... something like that?
As far as any third party is concerned the
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:59:23 +0300
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Otherwise oops will happen if ethernet device has not been opened:
Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x014c
Faulting instruction address: 0xc016f7f0
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
MPC85xx
David Miller wrote:
From: Ilpo_Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:40:51 +0200 (EET)
[PATCH] [TCP]: Fix TSO deferring
I'd say that most of what tcp_tso_should_defer had in between
there was dead code because of this.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I still dont understand.
tcpdump -p -n -s 1600 -c 1 doesnt reveal User data at all.
Without any exact data from you, I am afraid nobody can help.
Oh, I didn't see that you specified specific options. I'll still have
to anonymize 2000+ IP addresses, but I think there is an open source
i see. HZ can be 1000.. i should be wrong.
however, i got the following,
[root iproute2.org]# ./ip/ip route change 192.168.140.0/24 dev eth1 rto_min 4s
[root iproute2.org]# gdb -q ./ip/ip
Using host libthread_db library /lib/libthread_db.so.1.
(gdb) br iproute.c:512
Breakpoint 1 at 0x804fc8d:
Jeff,
Here are a few more for 2.6.24...please let me know if there are any
problems!
Thanks,
John
P.S. The rtl8187 USB ID is already in your upstream branch -- I'm sure
it would seem like a fix if it was the ID for your wireless stick. :-)
---
Individual patches are available here:
Dave,
A few more stragglers for 2.6.24...let me know if there are any
problems!
Thanks,
John
---
Individual patches available here:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/linville/wireless-2.6/fixes-davem
---
The following changes since commit
Dave,
These are destined for 2.6.25. The patches fall mostly into two
categories: a new rate control algorithm for mac80211, and some
cfg80211 enhancements (including mac80211 patches to use them).
Also there are some small hits in the iwlwifi drivers related to
rate control. I'll CC Jeff
Jeff,
More for 2.6.25...Mr. Woodhouse continues his savage assault on
libertas, the b43legacy version of the rfkill led patch is here
(b43legacy rfkill stuff is not in 2.6.24), and there are a couple of
iwlwifi patches as well.
Let me know if there are problems!
Thanks,
John
---
Individual
But I'd be very surprised if the router is acting as anything more
that a network-layer device. It might perhaps have some soft connection
state being used for generating accounting records. Being Cisco
it's probably a switch-router, so it might carry some per-port hard
state for validating
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:23:43 +0100
Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Hemminger a écrit :
The neighbor GC timer runs once a second, but it doesn't need to wake
up the machine.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c 2007-12-18
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:13:28 -0500 (EST)
Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sky2 can use deferrable timer for watchdog - reduces wakeups from idle per
second.
Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6/drivers/net/sky2.c 2007-12-07 10:04:39.0 -0500
Parag Warudkar wrote:
Reduce wakeups from idle per second.
Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c2007-12-07
10:04:39.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6-work/drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c2007-12-18
20:45:59.0 -0500
@@ -3899,7
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:29:23 +
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:16:03
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:netdev@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for
On Dec 20, 2007 12:05 PM, Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't even apply this patch and the e1000 one... not only is it whitespace
damaged it is also not properly formatted as patch at all. If you want me to
take
these patches seriously, then please fix the formatting issues.
Sigh -
On Dec 20, 2007 12:51 PM, Stephen Hemminger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quit top-posting!
If this is the case then the whole usage of round_jiffies() is bogus. All
users of round_jiffies()
should just be converted to deferrable?? I am a bit concerned that if
deferrable gets used everywhere
On Dec 20, 2007 12:10 PM, Stephen Hemminger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thinking about it more, this looks like a case for just using round_jiffies().
The GC timer needs to run to clean up under DoS attack, and deferring it
probably
isn't a good idea.
But what are the chances that a DoSed
From: Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reduces wakeups from idle per second.
Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Pavel Emelyanov schrieb:
This one is not that big, but is widely used: saves 1200 bytes
from net/ipv4/built-in.o
+void inet_twsk_put(struct inet_timewait_sock *tw)
+{
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(tw-tw_refcnt)) {
+ struct module *owner = tw-tw_prot-owner;
+
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:29:23 +
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:16:03
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:netdev@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use
Parag Warudkar wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 12:05 PM, Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't even apply this patch and the e1000 one... not only is it whitespace
damaged it is also not properly formatted as patch at all. If you want me to
take
these patches seriously, then please fix the
From: Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reduce wakeups from idle per second.
Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
My interpretation of the api is:
* round_jiffies() - timer wants to wakeup but isn't precise about when so
schedule
on next second when system will wake up anyway;
e.g why meetings are usually scheduled on the hour
* deferrable -
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
My interpretation of the api is:
* round_jiffies() - timer wants to wakeup but isn't precise
about when so schedule
on next second when system will wake up anyway;
e.g why meetings are usually scheduled on
the hour
David, this patchset lays the foundation for supporting multiple MSIX
IRQs. Only 1 additional MSIX is added to handle TX separately from RX
at the moment. Multiple TX and RX rings will be added in the future.
Please review for 2.6.25. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
[BNX2]: Add function to fetch hardware tx index.
This makes the code cleaner and easier to support different tx rings.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
index 469d259..f19a1e9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnx2.c
+++
[BNX2]: Restructure IRQ datastructures.
Add a table to keep track of multiple IRQs and restructure the IRQ
request and free functions so that they can be easily expanded to
handle multiple IRQs.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
[BNX2]: Introduce new bnx2_napi structure.
Introduce a bnx2_napi structure that will hold a napi_struct and
other fields to handle NAPI polling for the napi_struct. Various tx
and rx indexes and status block pointers will be moved from the main
bnx2 structure to this bnx2_napi structure.
Most
[BNX2]: Move tx indexes into bnx2_napi struct.
Tx related fields used in NAPI polling are moved from the main
bnx2 struct to the bnx2_napi struct.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
index 3f754e6..0300a75 100644
---
[BNX2]: Move rx indexes into bnx2_napi struct.
Rx related fields used in NAPI polling are moved from the main
bnx2 struct to the bnx2_napi struct.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
index 0300a75..ecfaad1 100644
---
[BNX2]: Support multiple MSIX IRQs.
Change bnx2_napi struct into an array and add code to manage multiple
IRQs. MSIX hardware structures and new registers are also added.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
index ecfaad1..196d053
[BNX2]: Add support for a new tx ring.
To separate TX IRQs into a different MSIX vector, we need to
support a new tx ring. The original tx ring will still be used
when not using MSIX.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
index
[BNX2]: Enable new tx ring.
Enable new tx ring and add new MSIX handler and NAPI poll function
for the new tx ring. Enable MSIX when the hardware supports it.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
index a4ed6ca..3745fc8 100644
---
[BNX2]: Update version to 1.7.1.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.c b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
index 08b0349..69a3ce3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnx2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@
#define DRV_MODULE_NAMEbnx2
#define PFX
On Dec 20, 2007 2:22 PM, Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, that's just bad and if there's no user-defineable limit to the deferral I
definately don't like this change.
Can I safely assume that any irq will cause all deferred timers to run?
I think even other causes for wakeup like
Kok, Auke wrote:
ok, that's just bad and if there's no user-defineable limit to the deferral I
definately don't like this change.
Can I safely assume that any irq will cause all deferred timers to run?
*on that cpu*. Timers are per cpu, as are interrupts. Just not per se the same
one ...
Parag Warudkar wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 2:22 PM, Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, that's just bad and if there's no user-defineable limit to the deferral I
definately don't like this change.
Can I safely assume that any irq will cause all deferred timers to run?
I think even other causes
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Parag Warudkar wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 2:22 PM, Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, that's just bad and if there's no user-defineable limit to the deferral I
definately don't like this change.
Can I safely assume that any irq will cause all deferred timers to run?
I
Satoru SATOH wrote, On 12/20/2007 05:21 PM:
i see. HZ can be 1000.. i should be wrong.
however, i got the following,
[root iproute2.org]# ./ip/ip route change 192.168.140.0/24 dev eth1 rto_min 4s
[root iproute2.org]# gdb -q ./ip/ip
...
(gdb) p hz
$1 = 10
That's why I had
Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 12/20/2007 09:24 PM:
...
but since it's your patch, I hope you do some additional checking
if it's always like this...
...or maybe only changing this all a little bit will make it look safer!
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
device_type property is bogus, thus use proper compatible.
Also change compatible property to fsl,ucc-mdio.
Per http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-December/048388.html
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc832x_mds.dts |3 +--
On Dec 20, 2007 3:04 PM, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is reasonable for Network driver watchdogs to use a
deferrable timer - if the machine is 100% IDLE there is no one needing
the network to be up. If there is something running even on the other
CPU - that is going
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, James Nichols wrote:
I still dont understand.
tcpdump -p -n -s 1600 -c 1 doesnt reveal User data at all.
Without any exact data from you, I am afraid nobody can help.
Oh, I didn't see that you specified specific options. I'll still have
to anonymize 2000+
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, James Nichols wrote:
You'd probably should also investigate the Linux kernel,
especially the size and locks of the components of the Sack data
structures and what happens to those data structures after Sack is
disabled (presumably the Sack data structure is in some
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:36:13 -0500
Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 3:04 PM, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is reasonable for Network driver watchdogs to use a
deferrable timer - if the machine is 100% IDLE there is no one needing
the network
James Nichols wrote
I still dont understand.
tcpdump -p -n -s 1600 -c 1 doesnt reveal User data at all.
Without any exact data from you, I am afraid nobody can help.
Oh, I didn't see that you specified specific options. I'll still have
to anonymize 2000+ IP addresses, but I
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:36:13 -0500
Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 3:04 PM, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is reasonable for Network driver watchdogs to use a
deferrable timer - if the machine is 100% IDLE there is no
Auke Kok wrote:
From: Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reduce wakeups from idle per second.
Signed-off-by: Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Jeff,
given the discussion with Stephen I'd like to skip merging this patch and the
e1000 one for
Three patches backed against net-2.6.25 from today. Some of the audit
messages are a little difficult to test by their nature but I've verified
that I'm still able to send/receive IPsec protected traffic with the patches
applied.
The first patch was posted before but David decided it best to
According to RFC4303, section 3.3.3 we need to drop outgoing packets which
cause the replay counter to overflow:
3.3.3. Sequence Number Generation
The sender's counter is initialized to 0 when an SA is established.
The sender increments the sequence number (or ESN) counter for this
This patch fixes a number of small but potentially troublesome things in the
XFRM/IPsec code:
* Use the 'audit_enabled' variable already in include/linux/audit.h
Removed the need for extern declarations local to each XFRM audit fuction
* Convert 'sid' to 'secid' everywhere we can
The
This patch adds a number of new IPsec audit events to meet the auditing
requirements of RFC4303. This includes audit hooks for the following events:
* Could not find a valid SA [sections 2.1, 3.4.2]
. xfrm_audit_state_notfound()
. xfrm_audit_state_notfound_simple()
* Sequence number
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:38:33 +0800
[IPSEC]: Rename tunnel-mode functions to avoid collisions with tunnels
It appears that I've managed to create two different functions both
called xfrm6_tunnel_output. This is because we have the plain tunnel
From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:40:25 -0800
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:40:30 -0800
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:40:33 -0800
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:40:32 -0800
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
APplied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:40:29 -0800
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:40:36 -0800
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:40:35 -0800
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:40:37 -0800
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
