Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1

2008-01-09 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:04:42 +0100 Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 08:57:53AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > ... > > diff --git a/lib/iommu-helper.c b/lib/iommu-helper.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000..495575a > &g

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1

2008-01-08 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:27:39 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:57:53 +0900 > FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Andrew, can you replace > > > > iommu-sg-add-iommu-helper-functions-for-the-free-area-man

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1

2008-01-08 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:59:48 +0100 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The patches are available at: > > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tomo/iommu/ > > > > Or if you

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1

2008-01-06 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:03:42 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 6, 2008 2:33 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:35:35 +0100 > > "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > &

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1

2008-01-06 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:35:35 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 6, 2008 12:23 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:41:10 +0100 > > "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1

2008-01-06 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:41:10 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 6, 2008 4:28 AM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:25:24 -0800 > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat

Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1

2008-01-05 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:25:24 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:10:17 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 5, 2008 3:52 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 5, 2008 11:13 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2][BNX2]: Add iSCSI support to BNX2 devices.

2007-09-27 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
CC'ed Jens, James, and linux-scsi again. On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:22:15 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 03:49 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 03:31 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrot

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2][BNX2]: Add iSCSI support to BNX2 devices.

2007-09-27 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
CC'ed Jens, James, and linux-scsi. On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:31:55 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > Yeah, we could nicely handle lld's restrictions (especially with > > stacking devices). But iommu code needs only max_segment

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2][BNX2]: Add iSCSI support to BNX2 devices.

2007-09-26 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:39:17 +0200 Hannes Reinecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Tomo, > > FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:00:36 +0100 > > Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 07:32:27AM

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2][BNX2]: Add iSCSI support to BNX2 devices.

2007-09-09 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:00:36 +0100 Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 07:32:27AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > >Yeah, iommu code ignores the lld limitations (the problem is that the > > >lld limitatio

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2][BNX2]: Add iSCSI support to BNX2 devices.

2007-09-08 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:36:47 -0500 Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +/* > > + * map SG list > > + */ > > +static int bnx2i_map_sg(struct bnx2i_hba *hba, struct bnx2i_cmd *cmd) > > +{ > > + struct scsi_cmnd *sc = cmd->scsi_cmd; > > + struct iscsi_bd *bd = cmd->bd_tbl->bd_tbl; > > +

Re: [PATCH] AF_PACKET: mmap compat support

2006-02-12 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [PATCH] AF_PACKET: mmap compat support Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:27:49 +0900 > > > NACK. The 32bit test ifdefs are horrible. Please add fops->compat_mmap > > > instead. > > > > is_compat_task()

Re: [PATCH] AF_PACKET: mmap compat support

2006-02-12 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [PATCH] AF_PACKET: mmap compat support Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 02:53:42 -0800 (PST) > > NACK. The 32bit test ifdefs are horrible. Please add fops->compat_mmap > > instead. > > is_compat_task() is going into asm-*/compat.h eventually anyway

[PATCH] AF_PACKET: mmap compat support

2006-02-10 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
This is AF_PACKET mmap compat support. I confirmed that 32-bit and 64-bit tcpdump binaries using AF_PACKET mmap'ed pcap can dump packets properly with a 64-bit kernel. Thanks to David for all your help. Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/packet/af_pack

Re: [PATCH] Packet socket: fix for 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userland

2006-02-07 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Packet socket: fix for 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userland Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:59:06 +0900 > From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Packet socket: fix for 64-bit kernel and

Re: [PATCH] Packet socket: fix for 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userland

2006-02-07 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Packet socket: fix for 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userland Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:48:02 -0800 (PST) > From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:41:41 +0900 > >

Re: [PATCH] Packet socket: fix for 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userland

2006-02-07 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
d shares it in the mmapped ring buffer. > > > > Seems it would be better to fix all data structures in the header file > > than fixing only tpacket_hdr structure. > > > > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <[EMAIL

[PATCH] Packet socket: directly access the mmapped ring buffer

2006-02-07 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
h going through the networking stack to avoid memory allocation and overhead. Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/net/af_packet.h |6 ++ net/packet/af_packet.c | 17 + 2 files c

[PATCH] Packet socket: fix for 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userland

2006-02-07 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
tpacket_hdr structure includes 'unsigned long' though kernel and userland shares it in the mmapped ring buffer. Seems it would be better to fix all data structures in the header file than fixing only tpacket_hdr structure. Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sig