Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igb: use igb_adapter->io_addr instead of e1000_hw->hw_addr

Here's the initial patch for igb I have, but it's on hold awaiting more changes in ixgbe regarding AER. -- Hisashi T Fujinaka - ht...@twofifty.com BSEE + BSChem + BAEnglish + MSCS + $2.50 = coffeeFrom todd.fujin...@intel.com Thu Nov 10 05:44:02 2016 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 05:36:1

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igb: use igb_adapter->io_addr instead of e1000_hw->hw_addr

On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: Incidentally we're just looking for a solution to that problem too. Do three patches to fix the same problem at rougly the same time already qualify as freak accident? FTR, I attached my current patch, which I was planning to submit after

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igb: use igb_adapter->io_addr instead of e1000_hw->hw_addr

urprise removal any longer so that means I wouldn't be able to test anything. I have to defer to you or Cao Jin. -- Hisashi T Fujinaka - ht...@twofifty.com (todd.fujin...@intel.com)

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ixgbe: Limit lowest interrupt rate for adaptive interrupt moderation to 12K

now and it hasn't received any feedback. I was hoping this could be submitted before the merge window closes for net-next. Thanks. I'm nobody, but it makes sense to me. -- Hisashi T Fujinaka - ht...@twofifty.com (also todd.fujin...@intel.com) BSEE + BSChem + BAEnglish + MSCS + $2.5