On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:54:42PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:15:43PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
...
We should fix the physdev dependencies since this is what is causing
problems.
...
config NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_PHYSDEV
On 12-09-2006 00:04, Jeff Garzik wrote:
John W. Linville wrote:
...
Not too explicitly, but I think Andrew mentions it in The Perfect
Patch:
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt
While you are looking, you might review Jeff's version of the same idea:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:25:32AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
Attachments are discouraged, but some corporate mail systems
provide no other way to send patches.
I thought they didn't read this but now I understand for whom
Mozilla Firefox is breaking all those lines with no mercy
On 23-08-2006 20:31, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:35:56 +0200
Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I've found it at last but on that occasion I've got some
doubt according to rcu_read_lock and rcu_call treatment:
isn't it illegal to block while in an RCU read-side
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 12:35:56PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
Hello,
I've found it at last but on that occasion I've got some
doubt according to rcu_read_lock and rcu_call treatment:
...
Actually there is one more doubt (bug really, but
not very probable): proc file reading is without
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:02:01PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
On 21-08-2006 10:17, David Miller wrote:
From: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:16:43 +0200
...
I was skeptical of this case too, until I checked how
fib_release_info() was called.
I overlooked
On 17-08-2006 11:36, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
Hello!
[IPV4]: severe locking bug in fib_semantics.c
The patch is for net-2.6.19, but the bug is present in all the kernels
since yore.
Found in 2.4 by Yixin Pan [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Why do we need lockdep,
when sharp-sighted eyes are available?
On 21-08-2006 10:17, David Miller wrote:
From: Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:16:43 +0200
...
But I hope the real reason for this patch isn't exactly like that.
Could fib_release_info() be interrupted by BH really?
Absolutely, yes it can. What makes you think
On 03-08-2006 00:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
...
Hi,
By the way, isn't htb supposed to recognize here ids
got like this: tc filter add ... classid 0:1
Some qdisc like prio do this and it is mentioned in
sch_api.c which is passing this without error code:
@@ -220,12 +220,13 @@ #endif
On 03-08-2006 11:34, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
On the other hand I don't understand why it should be good
if there could be the real priority(from tos) only by accident
equal to the classid?
OK! I've just done one more look and understand - this 0:Y
is only possible from filter, so the first
On 28-07-2006 16:39, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
It has some great patch to queue scheduler by Hubert Xu. I think it is
I'm immensly sorry to change the name of Mr Herbert Xu.
And I thought it's easy name - just like some famous conductor
(but not so famous). You'll not believe, but when I
On 27-07-2006 20:19, Art Haas wrote:
Hi.
I've got Fedora Rawhide running on a SMP PIII machine, and the latest
kernels from Fedora have been locking up when I run 'yum update' to
get the latest packages. I also experience lock-ups when I use
Firefox to do some web browsing. Not all my network
601 - 612 of 612 matches
Mail list logo
