"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" writes:
> The first patch here fixes two bugs on ppc32, and mips32. It fixes one
> bug on arc and arm32 (in certain configurations). It probably makes
> sense to get it in ASAP through the networking tree. I'd like to see
> testing on those four architectures if possib
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:37:45 + (UTC), Christophe Leroy wrote:
> This series implements extended BPF on powerpc32. For the implementation
> details, see the patch before the last.
>
> The following operations are not implemented:
>
> case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X: /* dst /= sr
"Naveen N. Rao" writes:
> On 2021/03/02 11:35AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 02:58:53PM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 3/1/21 11:04 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> > > When testing uprobes we the test gets GEP (Global Entry Point)
>> > > address from kallsyms, but then the
Uwe Kleine-König writes:
> The driver core ignores the return value of struct bus_type::remove()
> because there is only little that can be done. To simplify the quest to
> make this function return void, let struct vio_driver::remove() return
> void, too. All users already unconditionally return
/freescale/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.o
Add the missing MODULE_LICENSEs to fix the build. Both files include a
copyright header indicating they are GPL v2.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c | 1 +
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mii-fec.c
Andrew Lunn writes:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 01:22:29PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Since commit 1d6cd3929360 ("modpost: turn missing MODULE_LICENSE()
>> into error") the ppc32_allmodconfig build fails with:
>>
>> ERROR: modpost: missing MODULE_
/freescale/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.o
Add the missing MODULE_LICENSEs to fix the build. Both files include a
copyright header indicating they are GPL v2.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mii-bitbang.c | 1 +
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mii-fec.c
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:59:49 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The remove callback is only called for devices that were probed
> successfully before. As the matching probe function cannot complete
> without error if dev->match_id != PS3_MATCH_ID_SOUND, we don't have to
> check this here.
Applied t
Uwe Kleine-König writes:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:59:50 +0100,
>> Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> >
>> > The driver core ignores the return value of struct device_driver::remove
>> > because there is only little that c
Thomas Falcon writes:
> On 11/24/20 11:43 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Thomas Falcon writes:
>>> Ensure that received Subordinate Command-Response Queue (SCRQ)
>>> entries are properly read in order by the driver. These queues
>>> are used in the ibmvni
Thomas Falcon writes:
> Ensure that received Subordinate Command-Response Queue (SCRQ)
> entries are properly read in order by the driver. These queues
> are used in the ibmvnic device to process RX buffer and TX completion
> descriptors. dma_rmb barriers have been added after checking for a
> pen
Vitaly Chikunov writes:
> Adding netdev and PowerPC maintainers JFYI.
Thanks.
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:23:19AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 02:06:41AM +0300, Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Commit f143c11bb7b9 ("tools: bpf: Use local copy of
It seems clear the intent here is to do a comparison not an
assignment, so drop the extra parentheses to avoid any confusion.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freesc
Daniel Borkmann writes:
> On 04/30/2019 03:21 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I'm running selftests/bpf/test_tag and it's taking roughly half an hour
>> to complete, is that expected?
>>
>> I don't really grok what the tes
Hi Daniel,
I'm running selftests/bpf/test_tag and it's taking roughly half an hour
to complete, is that expected?
I don't really grok what the test is doing TBH, but it does appear to be
doing it 5 times :)
for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
do_test(&tests, 2, -1, bpf_gen_imm_
Souptick Joarder writes:
> Remove duplicate headers which are included twice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sabyasachi Gupta
> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder
> ---
...
> tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/pmu/ebb/fork_cleanup_test.c | 1 -
I took this hunk via the powerpc tree.
> diff --git a/tools/testing
Deepa Dinamani writes:
>> You touched powerpc in the previous patch but not this one.
>>
>> That's because we use the asm-generic version I assume.
>
> That is correct.
>
>> Would be good to mention in the change log though to avoid any confusion.
>
> I'm not sure how to do that now. It looks lik
r.kernel.org
> Cc: sparcli...@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h | 7 +--
> arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/socket.h| 6 --
> arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h | 6 --
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h | 4 ++--
The powerpc ch
Deepa Dinamani writes:
> Add new socket timeout options that are y2038 safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani
> Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn
> Cc: ccaul...@redhat.com
> Cc: da...@davemloft.net
> Cc: del...@gmx.de
> Cc: pau...@samba.org
> Cc: r...@linux-mips.org
> Cc: r...@twiddle.net
> Cc: clust
Daniel Borkmann writes:
< snip >
>
> I would actually just like to get rid of the BPF_JIT_LIMIT_DEFAULT
> define also given for 4.21 arm64 will have its own dedicated area for
> JIT allocations where neither the above limit nor the MODULES_END/
> MODULES_VADDR one would fit and I don't want to mak
On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 09:27:01 UTC, Sandipan Das wrote:
> Now that there are different variants of pt_regs for userspace and
> kernel, the uapi for the BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT program type must
> be changed by exporting the user_pt_regs structure instead of the
> pt_regs structure that is in-kerne
Alexei Starovoitov writes:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:57:01PM +0530, Sandipan Das wrote:
>> Now that there are different variants of pt_regs for userspace and
>> kernel, the uapi for the BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT program type must
>> be changed by exporting the user_pt_regs structure instead of
Michael Roth writes:
> Commit ede95a63b5 introduced a bpf_jit_limit tuneable to limit BPF
> JIT allocations. At compile time it defaults to PAGE_SIZE * 4,
> and is adjusted again at init time if MODULES_VADDR is defined.
>
> For ppc64 kernels, MODULES_VADDR isn't defined, so we're stuck with
; arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c | 6 +++---
> arch/ia64/sn/kernel/io_common.c | 3 ++-
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 3 ++-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c| 3 ++-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 3 ++
"Naveen N. Rao" writes:
> Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 02/15/2018 05:25 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 02/13/2018 05:05 AM, Sandipan Das wrote:
The imm field of a bpf_insn is a signed 32-bit integer. For
JIT-ed bpf-to-bpf function calls, it stores the offset from
__bpf_call_base
Randy Dunlap writes:
> On 02/12/2018 04:28 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Randy Dunlap writes:
>>
>>> From: Randy Dunlap
>>>
>>> Currently #includes for no obvious
>>> reason. It looks like it's only a convenience, so remove kmeml
Randy Dunlap writes:
> From: Randy Dunlap
>
> Currently #includes for no obvious
> reason. It looks like it's only a convenience, so remove kmemleak.h
> from slab.h and add to any users of kmemleak_*
> that don't already #include it.
> Also remove from source files that do not use it.
>
> Th
On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 12:38:46 UTC, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
> Acked-by: Rob Herring
Applied to powerpc next, thanks.
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/4be4119d1fbd93c44d5c639735c312
cheers
David Miller writes:
> From: Michael Ellerman
> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 15:22:22 +1100
>
>>> On Tue, Dec 19 2017, Michael Ellerman
>>> wrote:
>>>> This revert seems to have broken networking on one of my powerpc
>>>> machines, according to gi
Rasmus Villemoes writes:
> On Tue, Dec 19 2017, Michael Ellerman
> wrote:
>>> From: Johannes Berg
>>>
>>> This reverts commit d6f295e9def0; some userspace (in the case
>>
>> This revert seems to have broken networking on one of my powerpc
&g
Hi Johannes,
> From: Johannes Berg
>
> This reverts commit d6f295e9def0; some userspace (in the case
> we noticed it's wpa_supplicant), is relying on the current
> error code to determine that a fixed name interface already
> exists.
>
> Reported-by: Jouni Malinen
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Ber
"Tobin C. Harding" writes:
> This set plugs a kernel address leak that occurs if kallsyms symbol
> look up fails. This set was prompted by a leaking address found using
> scripts/leaking_addresses.pl on a PowerPC machine in the wild.
Any details on that? I haven't heard about it.
cheers
Frank Rowand writes:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 11/12/17 03:49, Michael Ellerman wrote:
...
>>
>> On our bare metal machines the device tree comes from skiboot
>> (firmware), with some of the content provided by hostboot (other
>> firmware), both of which are open
Hi Frank,
Frank Rowand writes:
> Hi Michael, Tobin,
>
> On 11/08/17 04:10, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> "Tobin C. Harding" writes:
>>> Currently we are leaking addresses from the kernel to user space. This
>>> script is an attempt to find some of those
"Tobin C. Harding" writes:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:10:56PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> "Tobin C. Harding" writes:
> [snip]
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I'm working an adding support for ppc64 to leaking_addresses.pl, I've
> added
"Tobin C. Harding" writes:
> Currently we are leaking addresses from the kernel to user space. This
> script is an attempt to find some of those leakages. Script parses
> `dmesg` output and /proc and /sys files for hex strings that look like
> kernel addresses.
>
> Only works for 64 bit kernels, t
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 18:53:01 UTC, Sandipan Das wrote:
> Take advantage of stack_depth tracking, originally introduced for
> x64, in powerpc JIT as well. Round up allocated stack by 16 bytes
> to make sure it stays aligned for functions called from JITed bpf
> program.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sandipan
On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 12:38:47 UTC, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
> Acked-by: Rob Herring
Applied to powerpc next, thanks.
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/3d2d4339cc326c427638daa67e264d
cheers
Shuah Khan writes:
> On 09/19/2017 07:51 AM, jo...@toxicpanda.com wrote:
>> From: Josef Bacik
>>
>> Some of the networking tests are very noisy and make it impossible to
>> see if we actually passed the tests as they run. Default to suppressing
>> the output from any tests run in order to make
Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
> Acked-by: Rob Herring
> ---
Rob this has your ack, but I'd expect it to go via your tree? Or should
I grab it?
cheers
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-of.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/booting-without-
Thierry Reding writes:
> From: Thierry Reding
>
> If the pci_find_pcie_root_port() function is called on a root port
> itself, return the root port rather than NULL.
>
> This effectively reverts commit 0e405232871d6 ("PCI: fix oops when
> try to find Root Port for a PCI device") which added an e
Daniel Borkmann writes:
> On 08/17/2017 12:30 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> The sysctl documentation states that the JIT is only available on
>> x86_64, which is no longer correct.
>>
>> Update the list, and break it out to indicate which architectures
>> suppor
Daniel Borkmann writes:
> On 08/16/2017 01:10 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Daniel Borkmann writes:
>>> On 08/16/2017 07:15 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/sysctl/net.txt b/Documentation/sysctl/net.txt
>>>> index 14
The sysctl documentation states that the JIT is only available on
x86_64, which is no longer correct.
Update the list, and break it out to indicate which architectures
support the cBPF JIT (via HAVE_CBPF_JIT) or the eBPF JIT
(HAVE_EBPF_JIT).
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
Documentation
Thierry Reding writes:
...
>
> In case of Tegra, dev actually points to the root port. Now if I read
> the above code correctly, highest_pcie_bridge will still be NULL in that
> case, which in turn will return NULL from pci_find_pcie_root_port(). But
> shouldn't it really return dev?
>
> The patch
Daniel Borkmann writes:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 08/16/2017 07:15 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> The sysctl documentation states that the JIT is only available on
>> x86_64, which is no longer correct.
>>
>> Update the list to include all architectures that enable
The sysctl documentation states that the JIT is only available on
x86_64, which is no longer correct.
Update the list to include all architectures that enable HAVE_CBPF_JIT
or HAVE_EBPF_JIT under some configuration.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
Documentation/sysctl/net.txt | 5 +++--
1
Paolo Abeni writes:
> Thank you!
>
> I'll submit formally the patch after some more testing.
Thanks.
> I noticed this version has entered the ppc patchwork, but I think that
> the formal submission should go towards the net-next tree.
Yeah it picks up all patches sent to the list. That's fine I
Hannes Frederic Sowa writes:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017, at 22:57, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>>
>> Can you please check if the following patch fixes the issue? Only
>> compiled tested here.
>>
>> Thanks!!!
>> ---
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
>> index 067a607..80d89fe 100644
>> --- a/net
arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/system-bus.c:static const struct dma_map_ops
ps3_ioc0_dma_ops = {
All of which look like they definitely can fail, but return 0 on error
and don't implement ->mapping_error.
So I guess I'm acking this and adding a TODO to fix up the NPU code at
least, the ps3 code is probably better left alone these days.
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman
cheers
Liviu Dudau writes:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 02:22:51PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jon Mason
>> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 15:43:30 -0400
>>
>> > use of_mdio_parse_addr() in place of an OF read of reg and a bounds
>> > check (which is litterally the exact same thing that
>> > of_mdio_pars
Stephen Rothwell writes:
> asm-generic/socket.h already has an exception for the differences that
> powerpc needs, so just include it after defining the differences.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h | 92
> +-
>
Elena Reshetova writes:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
> Sig
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 17:10:00 UTC, "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann
>
> We have a check earlier to ensure we don't proceed if image is NULL. As
> such, the redundant check can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann
> [Added similar changes for classic BPF JIT]
> Signed-of
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 17:10:01 UTC, "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> With bpf_jit_binary_alloc(), we allocate at a page granularity and fill
> the rest of the space with illegal instructions to mitigate BPF spraying
> attacks, while having the actual JIT'ed BPF program at a random location
> within the all
Joe Perches writes:
> On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 15:58 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Madalin Bucur
>> Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 22:17:26 +0200
>>
>> > This introduces the Freescale Data Path Acceleration Architecture
>> > +static inline size_t bpool_buffer_raw_size(u8 index, u8 cnt)
>> > +{
>> > +
Alexander Duyck writes:
> This change allows us to pass DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC which allows us to
> avoid invoking cache line invalidation if the driver will just handle it
> via a sync_for_cpu or sync_for_device call.
>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Cc: Paul Mackerras
>
On Fri, 2016-23-09 at 20:35:00 UTC, "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> While at it, ensure that the location of the local save area is
> consistent whether or not we setup our own stackframe. This property is
> utilised in the next patch that adds support for tail calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao
S
Olof Johansson writes:
> The platform is old, very few users and I lack bandwidth to keep after
> it these days.
>
> Mark the base platform as well as the drivers as orphans, patches have
> been flowing through the fallback maintainers for a while already.
Sorry to see you go, but thanks for kee
Shuah Khan writes:
> Update to work under selftests. dnotify_test will not be run as part of
> selftests suite and will not included in install targets. It can be built
> separately for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/Makefile | 10 ++
> 1
We'd like to eventually remove NO_IRQ on powerpc, so remove usages of it
from powerpc-only drivers.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_mac.h | 2 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-fcc.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_ene
On Wed, 2016-22-06 at 16:25:02 UTC, "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> The existing LI32() macro can sometimes result in a sign-extended 32-bit
> load that does not clear the top 32-bits properly. As an example,
> loading 0x7fff results in the register containing
> 0x7fff. While this does not
On Wed, 2016-22-06 at 16:25:01 UTC, "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> Classic BPF JIT was never ported completely to work on little endian
> powerpc. However, it can be enabled and will crash the system when used.
> As such, disable use of BPF JIT on ppc64le.
>
> Reported-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 19:02 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> PPC64 eBPF JIT compiler.
>
> Enable with:
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
> or
> echo 2 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
>
> ... to see the generated JIT code. This can further be processed with
> tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm.
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 14:28 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> On 2016/06/20 03:56PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:19:14PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > > On 2016/06/17 10:00AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi, Michael and Naveen.
> > > >
On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 10:00 -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> From a984dc02b6317a1d3a3c2302385adba5227be5bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 13:22:12 -0300
> Subject: [PATCH] ppc: Fix BPF JIT for ABIv2
>
> ABIv2 used for ppc64le d
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 08:45 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 6/21/16 7:47 AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The calling convention is different with ABIv2 and so we'll need changes
> > > > in bpf_slow_path_common() and sk_negative_common().
> > >
> > > How big would th
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 14:28 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> On 2016/06/20 03:56PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 11:19:14PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > > On 2016/06/17 10:00AM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi, Michael and Naveen.
> > > >
On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 12:28 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> On 2016/06/21 09:38AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 23:06 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > >
> > > #include
> > >
> > > in bpf_jit_comp64.c
> > >
>
On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 23:06 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> On 2016/06/17 10:53PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-07-06 at 13:32:23 UTC, "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> > > b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_ji
On Tue, 2016-07-06 at 13:32:23 UTC, "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..954ff53
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,956 @@
...
> +
> +static void bpf
| 10 +++---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c | 11 +++
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman (powerpc)
cheers
On Tue, 2015-08-12 at 22:44:02 UTC, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> This file was originally cloned off of the MPC8641D-HPCN reference
> platform, which actually had a PHY IRQ line connected. However
> this board does not. The bogus entry was largely inert and went
> undetected until commit 321beec5047af
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 21:04 -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> [Re: [PATCH] sbc8641: drop bogus PHY IRQ entries from DTS file] On 09/12/2015
> (Wed 12:10) Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 17:44 -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > > This file was originally clone
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 21:40 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Gortmaker
> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:44:02 -0500
> > This file was originally cloned off of the MPC8641D-HPCN reference
> > platform, which actually had a PHY IRQ line connected. However
> > this board does not. The bogus entry
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 17:44 -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> This file was originally cloned off of the MPC8641D-HPCN reference
> platform, which actually had a PHY IRQ line connected. However
> this board does not. The bogus entry was largely inert and went
> undetected until commit 321beec5047af
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 05:59 +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We tested some 4.3 kernels on a P.A. Semi reference board. Ultimately,
> ethernet does not work, though on the reference board, the interface is
> detected, gets link, but will not pass any packets/traffic.
>
> Somewhere
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 07:07 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 11:41 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 03:30 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 13:54 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > > e1000e_disable
On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 03:30 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 13:54 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > e1000e_disable_aspm_locked() is only used in __e1000_resume() which is
> > inside CONFIG_PM. So when CONFIG_PM=n we get a "defined but not u
e1000e_disable_aspm_locked() is only used in __e1000_resume() which is
inside CONFIG_PM. So when CONFIG_PM=n we get a "defined but not used"
warning for e1000e_disable_aspm_locked().
Move it inside the existing CONFIG_PM block to avoid the warning.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
--
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 21:25 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 12:21 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 19:59 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 01:06 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > > (Evolution 3.16 is basica
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 19:59 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 01:06 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > (Evolution 3.16 is basically unbearable for replying to patches.
> > Anyone
> > else running into this?)
>
> If you mean the crazy lag when selecting moderate-to-large amounts of
> te
On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 14:43 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Michael Ellerman
> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:52:32 +1000
>
> > The recent commit to only register the EHEA memory hotplug hooks on
> > adapter probe has a few problems.
> >
> > Firstly the referen
ehea: registering mr failed
ehea: register MR failed - driver inoperable!
ehea: memory is going offline
Fixes: aa183323312d ("ehea: Register memory hotplug, reboot and crash hooks on
adapter probe")
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ehea/ehea_main.c | 6
(i < 0)
> + printk(KERN_INFO "Warning: Could not disable RX section\n");
> +
> + i = 1000;
> + pasemi_write_dma_reg(PAS_DMA_COM_TXCMD, 0);
> + while ((i > 0) && (pasemi_read_dma_reg(PAS_DMA_COM_TXSTA) & 1))
> + i--;
This
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 16:24 +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> On Monday 04 February 2008 15:46, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 14:04 +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > > Add memory remove hotplug support
>
> > > @@ -3559,6 +3578,10 @@ in
stering crash handler");
You don't do anything except print a message if the registration fails.
What happens when someone tries to remove memory but the memory notifier
wasn't registered properly? Bang?
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http:
t perhaps ehea_crash_shutdown() would be clearer.
> @@ -3396,10 +3496,15 @@ out:
>
> static void __exit ehea_module_exit(void)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> flush_scheduled_work();
> driver_remove_file(&ehea_driver.driver, &driver_attr_capabilities);
>
gt; + memset(adapter->res_handles, sizeof(adapter->res_handles), 0);
>
> arguments wrong way around.
Remind me why bzero is deprecated again? :)
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 2118
ete them before the driver loads.
c) if neither of those work, provide a minimal routine that _only_
deletes the handles in the crashed kernel.
d)
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 7
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 20:48 +0100, Christoph Raisch wrote:
> Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30.10.2007 23:50:36:
> >
> > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 09:39 +0100, Christoph Raisch wrote:
> > >
> > > Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 09:39 +0100, Christoph Raisch wrote:
>
> Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28.10.2007 23:32:17:
> >
> >
> > How do you plan to support kdump?
> >
>
> When kexec is fully supported kdump should work out of the box
>
> before kexec starts a new kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
How do you plan to support kdump?
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 13:13 -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 11:49:24AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >
> > On pseries there's a chance it will work for PCI error recovery, but if
> > so it's just lucky that firmware has left everyth
able() in the error detection and recovery sequence.
Yes I think so. That way we can properly reconfigure via the firmware
interface. The other option would be to design some new arch hook to do
resume, but just doing a disable/enable seems simpler to me.
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM
will
be bogus.
That's a pity, but AFAIK it shouldn't be a problem because we don't
enable CONFIG_PM on those machines anyway. If we ever want to we'll need
to sort out with firmware how that will work WRT restoring MSI state.
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia
tching branches and back again is less so.
ccache!
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
s
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 21:01 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > I wish there was a git option to "just make my shit look like the
> > remote, dammit!" The above is the "easiest" way I know how to do that.
>
> git-fetch -f remote:local ?
There's alwa
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 21:54 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Linas posted the patches, I responded querying whether the bug fixes
> > should go into 2.6.22, and then you told him "you need to order your bug
> > fixes first in the queue". Which
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 19:00 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 01:20:20PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:06:08PM -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:12:31AM +1000, Michael
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
