, and David!
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6.25-rc1/include/net/dst.h 2008-02-21 14:33:43.0 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc1_work/include/net/dst.h 2008-02-22 12:52:19.0
+0800
@@ -52,15 +52,10 @@ struct dst_entry
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 08:35 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Zhang, Yanmin a �crit :
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 11:11 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:12:38 +0800
Zhang, Yanmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 15:22 -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 08:40 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Zhang, Yanmin a �crit :
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 12:33 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:12:38 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin said:
I also think __refcnt is the key. I did a new testing by adding 2
unsigned long
pading
-off-by: Zhang Yanmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6.25-rc1/include/net/dst.h 2008-02-21 14:33:43.0 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.25-rc1_work/include/net/dst.h 2008-02-21 14:36:22.0
+0800
@@ -52,11 +52,10 @@ struct dst_entry
unsigned short header_len; /* more
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 11:11 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:12:38 +0800
Zhang, Yanmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 15:22 -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:21:48 +0100
On linux-2.6.25-rc1
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 12:33 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:12:38 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin said:
I also think __refcnt is the key. I did a new testing by adding 2 unsigned
long
pading before lastuse, so the 3 members are moved to next cache line. The
performance
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 15:21 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Zhang, Yanmin a écrit :
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 07:05 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Zhang, Yanmin a �crit :
Comparing with kernel 2.6.24, tbench result has regression with
2.6.25-rc1.
1) On 2 quad-core processor stoakley: 4
Comparing with kernel 2.6.24, tbench result has regression with
2.6.25-rc1.
1) On 2 quad-core processor stoakley: 4%.
2) On 4 quad-core processor tigerton: more than 30%.
bisect located below patch.
b4ce92775c2e7ff9cf79cca4e0a19c8c5fd6287b is first bad commit
commit
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 07:05 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Zhang, Yanmin a �crit :
Comparing with kernel 2.6.24, tbench result has regression with
2.6.25-rc1.
1) On 2 quad-core processor stoakley: 4%.
2) On 4 quad-core processor tigerton: more than 30%.
bisect located below patch
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 10:36 -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
When parsing the -P option in scan_socket_args() of src/nettest_bsd.c,
netperf is using break_args() from src/netsh.c which indeed if the
command line says -P 12345 will set both the local and remote port
numbers to 12345. If instead you
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 08:42 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 10:36 -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
When parsing the -P option in scan_socket_args() of src/nettest_bsd.c,
netperf is using break_args() from src/netsh.c which indeed if the
command line says -P 12345 will set both
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 09:46 -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
*) netperf/netserver support CPU affinity within themselves with the
global -T option to netperf. Is the result with taskset much different?
The equivalent to the above would be to run netperf with:
./netperf -T 0,7 ..
I checked
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 13:24 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 09:46 -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
*) netperf/netserver support CPU affinity within themselves with the
global -T option to netperf. Is the result with taskset much different?
The equivalent to the above would
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 22:22 -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Zhang, Yanmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:07:19 +0800
I am wondering if UDP stack in kernel has a bug.
If one server binds to INADDR_ANY with port N, then any other socket
can be bound to a specific IP address
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 07:27 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Zhang, Yanmin a �crit :
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 13:24 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 09:46 -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
*) netperf/netserver support CPU affinity within themselves with the
global -T option to netperf
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 21:53 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:44:40AM +, Ilpo J�rvinen wrote:
I tried to use bisect to locate the bad patch between 2.6.22 and
2.6.23-rc1,
but the bisected kernel wasn't stable and went crazy.
TCP work between that is very
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 08:34 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 21:53 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:44:40AM +, Ilpo Jrvinen wrote:
I tried to use bisect to locate the bad patch between 2.6.22 and
2.6.23-rc1,
but the bisected kernel
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 11:21 +0200, Ilpo J�rvinen wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Ilpo J�rvinen wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 17:35 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
As a matter of fact, 2.6.23 has about 6% regression and 2.6.24-rc's
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 09:56 -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
The test command is:
#sudo taskset -c 7 ./netserver
#sudo taskset -c 0 ./netperf -t TCP_RR -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -i 50,3 -I 99,5
-- -r 1,1
A couple of comments/questions on the command lines:
Thanks for your kind comments.
*)
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 17:35 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
The regression is:
1)stoakley with 2 qual-core processors: 11%;
2)Tulsa with 4 dual-core(+hyperThread) processors:13%;
I have new update on this issue and also cc to netdev maillist.
Thank David Miller for pointing me the netdev maillist
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 03:44, Linas Vepstas wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 08:49:27AM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 00:26, Linas Vepstas wrote:
Adds PCI Error recovery callbacks to the Intel 10-gigabit ethernet
ixgb device driver. Lightly tested, works
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 00:26, Linas Vepstas wrote:
Adds PCI Error recovery callbacks to the Intel 10-gigabit ethernet
ixgb device driver. Lightly tested, works.
Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+/**
+ * ixgb_io_error_detected() - called when PCI error is detected
+ * @pdev
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 06:24, Linas Vepstas wrote:
Please apply and forward upstream.
--linas
[PATCH] PCI Error Recovery: e100 network device driver
Various PCI bus errors can be signaled by newer PCI controllers. This
patch adds the PCI error recovery callbacks to the intel ethernet
23 matches
Mail list logo
