Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Since the e1000 change is non-trivial I'm not going to bypass
the driver author on it, sorry.
What I did do was put the netdev_alloc_skb() change into my
tree, and since
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >Since the e1000 change is non-trivial I'm not going to bypass
> > >the driver author on it, sorry.
> > >
> > >What I did do was put the netdev_alloc_skb() change into my
> > >tree, a
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 05:29:54PM -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On 8/7/06, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 15:01:09 +0200
> >
> >> All caller of netdev_alloc_skb need to assign skb->dev shortly
> >> afterwards. Mov
On 8/7/06, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 15:01:09 +0200
> All caller of netdev_alloc_skb need to assign skb->dev shortly
> afterwards. Move it into common code.
>
> I also had to fixup a little bit of the surrounding co
From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 15:01:09 +0200
> All caller of netdev_alloc_skb need to assign skb->dev shortly
> afterwards. Move it into common code.
>
> I also had to fixup a little bit of the surrounding control flow in
> e1000 - it was just too convoluted.
All caller of netdev_alloc_skb need to assign skb->dev shortly
afterwards. Move it into common code.
I also had to fixup a little bit of the surrounding control flow in
e1000 - it was just too convoluted.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/net/e1000/e
