On Friday 28 April 2006 15:33, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Friday 28 April 2006 15:24, you wrote:
> > struct data_ring{
> > /*
> > * net_device where this ring belongs to.
> > */
> > struct net_device *net_dev;
> >
> > /*
> > * Work structure for bot
On Friday 28 April 2006 15:24, you wrote:
> struct data_ring{
> /*
>* net_device where this ring belongs to.
>*/
> struct net_device *net_dev;
>
> /*
>* Work structure for bottom half interrupt handling.
>*/
> struct wor
On Friday 28 April 2006 15:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:57:31PM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > On Friday 28 April 2006 00:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:02:52AM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > > > From: Ivo van Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:57:31PM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> On Friday 28 April 2006 00:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:02:52AM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > > From: Ivo van Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Instead of dma_*_coherent
> > > use pci_*consistent
On Friday 28 April 2006 00:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:02:52AM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > From: Ivo van Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Instead of dma_*_coherent
> > use pci_*consistent functions.
>
> No point in doing that, quite reverse as you use the gfp_ma
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:02:52AM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> From: Ivo van Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Instead of dma_*_coherent
> use pci_*consistent functions.
No point in doing that, quite reverse as you use the gfp_mask argument
which is a (small) pessimation here.
-
To unsubscribe fro
From: Ivo van Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Add linux/dma-mapping.h header to allow compilation
on some architectures. Instead of dma_*_coherent
use pci_*consistent functions.
Signed-off-by: Ivo van Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -uprN wireless-dev-rt2x00/drivers/net/wireless/d80211/rt2x00/rt2400pci
