Re: [PATCH net-next] ravb: Remove rx buffer ALIGN

2016-05-01 Thread Yoshihiro Kaneko
Hi Simon-san, Thank you for testing this patch! Thanks, kaneko 2016-04-29 8:34 GMT+09:00 Simon Horman : > Hi Sergei, Hi Kaneko-san, > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:14:41PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >> Hello. >> >> On 04/24/2016 07:16 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote: >> >>

Re: [PATCH net-next] ravb: Remove rx buffer ALIGN

2016-05-01 Thread Yoshihiro Kaneko
Hi Sergei, Sorry for the late reply. 2016-04-27 4:14 GMT+09:00 Sergei Shtylyov : > Hello. > > On 04/24/2016 07:16 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote: > >> From: Kazuya Mizuguchi >> >> Aligning the reception data size is not required.

Re: [PATCH net-next] ravb: Remove rx buffer ALIGN

2016-04-28 Thread Simon Horman
Hi Sergei, Hi Kaneko-san, On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:14:41PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 04/24/2016 07:16 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote: > > >From: Kazuya Mizuguchi > > > >Aligning the reception data size is not required. > >OK, the gen 2/3

Re: [PATCH net-next] ravb: Remove rx buffer ALIGN

2016-04-26 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 04/24/2016 07:16 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote: From: Kazuya Mizuguchi Aligning the reception data size is not required. OK, the gen 2/3 manuals indeed don't require this. I assume the patch has been tested... Signed-off-by: Kazuya Mizuguchi

[PATCH net-next] ravb: Remove rx buffer ALIGN

2016-04-24 Thread Yoshihiro Kaneko
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi Aligning the reception data size is not required. Signed-off-by: Kazuya Mizuguchi Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko --- This patch is based on the master branch of David Miller's