On 04/29/2018 07:33 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> I don't know if we really want all of these MIPS specific changes to
> go via the net-next tree.
>
> The right way to do this is probably getting this series into the MIPS
> architecture tree.
>
David,
Correct, and I should have been clearer
From: "Steven J. Hill"
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 18:30:10 -0500
> We want to add the Cavium OCTEON-III network driver. But since
> interacting with the input and output queues is done via special CPU
> local memory, we also need to add support to the MIPS/Octeon
>
We want to add the Cavium OCTEON-III network driver. But since
interacting with the input and output queues is done via special CPU
local memory, we also need to add support to the MIPS/Octeon
architecture code. Aren't SoCs nice in this way? These are the
prerequisite patches that are needed