On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 16:46 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 13:55 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> >> After commit 1215e51edad1 ("ipv4: fix a deadlock in ip_ra_control")
>>
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 16:46 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 13:55 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> >> After commit 1215e51edad1 ("ipv4: fix a deadlock in ip_ra_control")
> >> we always take RTNL lock for ip_ra_control() which is the
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:46 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 13:55 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> After commit 1215e51edad1 ("ipv4: fix a deadlock in ip_ra_control")
>> we always take RTNL lock for ip_ra_control() which is the only place
>> we update the list ip_ra_chain, so the ip_ra_
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 13:55 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> After commit 1215e51edad1 ("ipv4: fix a deadlock in ip_ra_control")
> we always take RTNL lock for ip_ra_control() which is the only place
> we update the list ip_ra_chain, so the ip_ra_lock is no longer needed,
> we just need to disable BH ther
After commit 1215e51edad1 ("ipv4: fix a deadlock in ip_ra_control")
we always take RTNL lock for ip_ra_control() which is the only place
we update the list ip_ra_chain, so the ip_ra_lock is no longer needed,
we just need to disable BH there.
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang
---
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c |
