On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 09:29:42AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 12/31/17 9:14 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > To make IPv6 more in line with IPv4 we need to be able to respond
> > differently to different netdev events. For example, when a netdev is
> > unregistered all the routes using it as their n
On 12/31/17 9:14 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> To make IPv6 more in line with IPv4 we need to be able to respond
> differently to different netdev events. For example, when a netdev is
> unregistered all the routes using it as their nexthop device should be
> flushed, whereas when the netdev's carrier
To make IPv6 more in line with IPv4 we need to be able to respond
differently to different netdev events. For example, when a netdev is
unregistered all the routes using it as their nexthop device should be
flushed, whereas when the netdev's carrier changes only the 'linkdown'
flag should be toggle
