Herbert Xu wrote:
Hi Sridhar:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 05:31:24PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
I think we currently assume atleast the SCTP header and the data
chunk header to be in the skb head.
But we do handle skbs with data in the frag_list.
Not sure about skb's with paged fragments.
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 09:36 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Herbert Xu wrote:
Hi Sridhar:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 05:31:24PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
I think we currently assume atleast the SCTP header and the data
chunk header to be in the skb head.
But we do handle skbs with
Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 09:36 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Herbert Xu wrote:
Hi Sridhar:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 05:31:24PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
I think we currently assume atleast the SCTP header and the data
chunk header to be in the skb head.
But we do
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 23:46 -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:11:28 +1100
[SCTP]: Always linearise packet on input
...
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll apply this, thanks a lot.
Sridhar, could you please
Hi Sridhar:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 05:31:24PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
I think we currently assume atleast the SCTP header and the data
chunk header to be in the skb head.
But we do handle skbs with data in the frag_list.
Not sure about skb's with paged fragments.
You can't assume
Hi Dave:
[SCTP]: Always linearise packet on input
I was looking at a RHEL5 bug report involving Xen and SCTP
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212550).
It turns out that SCTP wasn't written to handle skb fragments at
all. The absence of any calls to skb_may_pull is testament
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:11:28 +1100
[SCTP]: Always linearise packet on input
...
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll apply this, thanks a lot.
Sridhar, could you please organise an audit of SCTP to make sure
that it deals with skb fragments
