RE: [mm PATCH v2 01/26] swiotlb: Drop unused functions swiotlb_map_sg and swiotlb_unmap_sg

2016-11-03 Thread Duyck, Alexander H
..@intel.com>; linux...@kvack.org; akpm@linux- > foundation.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [mm PATCH v2 01/26] swiotlb: Drop unused functions > swiotlb_map_sg and swiotlb_unmap_sg > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:29:52AM -0400, Konrad Rze

Re: [mm PATCH v2 01/26] swiotlb: Drop unused functions swiotlb_map_sg and swiotlb_unmap_sg

2016-11-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:29:52AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Somehow I thought you wanted to put them through your tree (which > is why I acked them). > > I can take them and also the first couple of Alexander through > my tree. Or if it makes it simpler - they can go through the -mm

Re: [mm PATCH v2 01/26] swiotlb: Drop unused functions swiotlb_map_sg and swiotlb_unmap_sg

2016-11-03 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 07:14:46AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 07:12:31AM -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > There are no users for swiotlb_map_sg or swiotlb_unmap_sg so we might as > > well just drop them. > > FYI, I sent the same patch already on Sep, 11 and Konrad

Re: [mm PATCH v2 01/26] swiotlb: Drop unused functions swiotlb_map_sg and swiotlb_unmap_sg

2016-11-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 07:12:31AM -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote: > There are no users for swiotlb_map_sg or swiotlb_unmap_sg so we might as > well just drop them. FYI, I sent the same patch already on Sep, 11 and Konrad already ACKed it: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/11/112