On 8/2/2015 12:48 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 12:24:23AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
addressed in incremental patch, as Doug suggested. Jason, it's wrong
to send developers again and again
In many respects, I expect the ib_unregister_device() call to mirror the
error unwind found in the register call with the modifications for
dealing with a device that was actually live.
Yes, it should look like that, I also noticed there were ordering
problems in this area. and we probably
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Jason Gunthorpe
jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 12:24:23AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
addressed in incremental patch, as Doug suggested. Jason, it's wrong
to send developers again and again to fix things which were
perfect in Vn-1
On 07/31/2015 04:18 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:41:39PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
Please be more specific here. What are you objecting to? Are you
objecting to a flush_workqueue from a release() context? Because I
don't see anything in the kref documentation or
On 07/31/2015 05:40 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Matan Barak mat...@mellanox.com wrote:
[...]
Changes from V6:
(1) Addressed Jason's comments:
(a) Cache is no longer a client but part of IB infrastructure
(b) No need for READ_ONCE and
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 08:50:24AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
So... are we ready to go with V7 upstream?
Yes. I've already pulled it in.
You are taking the netdev stuff without an ack from netdev??
I've been too busy too look at v7, but a quick check of the 'move the
cache into core code
On 07/31/2015 12:32 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 08:50:24AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
So... are we ready to go with V7 upstream?
Yes. I've already pulled it in.
You are taking the netdev stuff without an ack from netdev??
I've pulled it in, yes. Dave
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 01:41:39PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
Please be more specific here. What are you objecting to? Are you
objecting to a flush_workqueue from a release() context? Because I
don't see anything in the kref documentation or the kref
implementation that prevents or
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 12:24:23AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
addressed in incremental patch, as Doug suggested. Jason, it's wrong
to send developers again and again to fix things which were
perfect in Vn-1 but also not being covered by reviewers on Vn-1, at
some point the reviewer can't load
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/31/2015 12:32 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 08:50:24AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
So... are we ready to go with V7 upstream?
Yes. I've already pulled it in.
You are taking the netdev stuff
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Matan Barak mat...@mellanox.com wrote:
[...]
Changes from V6:
(1) Addressed Jason's comments:
(a) Cache is no longer a client but part of IB infrastructure
(b) No need for READ_ONCE and flush_workqueue when tearing down
the cache
11 matches
Mail list logo
