On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 16-06-19 11:14 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Florian Fainelli
>> wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> I have also mentioned this before, the default api must provide
>> accumulated (hw and sw) stats...,
>> because this
Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:28:31PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>On 16-06-19 11:14 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Florian Fainelli
>>wrote:
>
>
>>
>>I have also mentioned this before, the default api must provide
>>accumulated (hw and sw) stats...,
>>because this is th
On 16-06-19 11:14 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
I have also mentioned this before, the default api must provide
accumulated (hw and sw) stats...,
because this is the api that the user queries on an interface.
Sorry - I missed those discu
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 06/17/2016 08:42 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:35:53PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>> On 6/17/16 8:54 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
On 16-06-17 10:05 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 16-06-17 10:05 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>
>> Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:48:35PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/17/16 2:24 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
>>
>> That is problematic. Existing apps depend on rtnetlink stat
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:48:35PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>On 6/17/16 2:24 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>>
>>>The problem we try to handle is different, it's about offloaded
>>>forwarded packets which are not seen by kernel. Let me try to
Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 03:58:56PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>On 16-06-18 04:00 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 07:12:22PM CEST, f.faine...@gmail.com wrote:
>
Yep. And I believe that for offloaded forwarding, this tools should see
hw counters, as they show what is going on in
On 16-06-18 04:00 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 07:12:22PM CEST, f.faine...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep. And I believe that for offloaded forwarding, this tools should see
hw counters, as they show what is going on in real.
If your NIC is offloading packets today, these tools typically
Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 07:12:22PM CEST, f.faine...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 06/17/2016 08:42 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:35:53PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>> On 6/17/16 8:54 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
On 16-06-17 10:05 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Jun 17, 2016
On 06/17/2016 08:42 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:35:53PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>> On 6/17/16 8:54 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>>> On 16-06-17 10:05 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:48:35PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
> On 6/17/16 2:
Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:35:53PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On 6/17/16 8:54 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>>On 16-06-17 10:05 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>>Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:48:35PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
On 6/17/16 2:24 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>>That is pro
On 6/17/16 8:54 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
On 16-06-17 10:05 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:48:35PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
On 6/17/16 2:24 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
That is problematic. Existing apps depend on rtnetlink stats. But if we
don't count offloaded for
Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 04:54:34PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>On 16-06-17 10:05 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:48:35PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>>On 6/17/16 2:24 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
>>
>>That is problematic. Existing apps depend on rtnetlink stats. But if w
On 16-06-17 10:05 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:48:35PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
On 6/17/16 2:24 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
That is problematic. Existing apps depend on rtnetlink stats. But if we
don't count offloaded forwarded packets, the apps don't see anything.
Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 03:48:35PM CEST, d...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On 6/17/16 2:24 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>
>>The problem we try to handle is different, it's about offloaded
>>forwarded packets which are not seen by kernel. Let me try to draw it :)
>>
>>port1 port2 (HW
On 6/17/16 2:24 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
The problem we try to handle is different, it's about offloaded
forwarded packets which are not seen by kernel. Let me try to draw it :)
port1 port2 (HW stats are counted here)
\ /
\
Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:26:32AM CEST, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>From: Jiri Pirko
>Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:37:13 +0200
>
>> Until now we had stats functions return SW statistics. However, it makes
>> a lot of sense to return HW stats as default. The existing apps count with
>> having the defaul
From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:37:13 +0200
> Until now we had stats functions return SW statistics. However, it makes
> a lot of sense to return HW stats as default. The existing apps count with
> having the defaults stats complete, but that is not true now as the offloaded
> forward
18 matches
Mail list logo