PATCH - Pktgen srcmac fix - Kernel 2.6.22.6

2007-09-01 Thread Adit Ranadive
diff -urNp linux-orig/net/core/pktgen.c linux-mod/net/core/pktgen.c --- linux-orig/net/core/pktgen.c2007-08-31 02:21:01.0 -0400 +++ linux-mod/net/core/pktgen.c 2007-09-01 20:51:22.0 -0400 @@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ * * 802.1Q/Q-in-Q support by Francesco Fondelli (FF) <[EMAIL PR

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-09-01 Thread Daniele Venzano
- Message d'origine - De: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:50:03 -0400 Sujet: Re: Re: pktgen terminating condition >I dont know if you followed the discussion - by defering the freeing of >skbs, you will be slowing down socket apps sending from the l

Re: Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-31 Thread jamal
On Fri, 2007-31-08 at 14:17 +0200, Daniele Venzano wrote: > I don't regard the TxOK solution as something usable for mainline, but it has > its > use for the users of pktgen. I dont know if you followed the discussion - by defering the freeing of skbs, you will be slowing do

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-31 Thread jamal
On Thu, 2007-30-08 at 22:19 -0700, David Miller wrote: > You could implement this quite simply using skb->destructor. Thats what i was thinking .. > It will add some atomics, so on weaker pktgen source systems > it might decrease the generators rate. Indeed. So maybe a config op

Re: Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-31 Thread Daniele Venzano
- Message d'origine - De: "Mandeep Baines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:59:42 -0700 Sujet: Re: pktgen terminating condition >> Looks good to me given the desire. I would bounce it by whoever the >> maintainer is - they may have some in

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-30 Thread David Miller
From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:08:40 -0400 > I was confusing it with another issue where pktgen could send a lot of > packets without waiting for them to be freed; there are some drivers > (10G) which may hold onto 8K skbs. A gazillion ooms start

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-30 Thread jamal
On Wed, 2007-29-08 at 18:32 +0200, Robert Olsson wrote: > Yes it's synchronization issue... the test is over and we have sent > all pkts to the device but pktgen cannot free the skb for it still > has refcounts. Ok, right. I was confusing it with another issue where pktge

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-30 Thread jamal
On Wed, 2007-29-08 at 09:59 -0700, Mandeep Baines wrote: > I'll work on a NAPI patch. It's a GoodThing - go for it. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/maj

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-29 Thread Mandeep Baines
ld it not be sufficient to turn it on once at > open()? > You have to set this bit to restart the Tx State Machine. You could optimize this if you use the TxIdle interrupt to tell you when you really need to set this bit. > > Anyway, if I rewrite the driver to use TxOK instead of TxIdle

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-29 Thread Robert Olsson
jamal writes: > On Tue, 2007-28-08 at 21:43 -0700, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote: > I think its a good thing pktgen caught this; i am unsure however if it > is doing the right thing. Hoping Robert would respond. > One thing pktgen could do is restrict the amount of outstanding b

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-29 Thread Grant Grundler
ble interrupts and switch back to interrupt mode of operation. I just don't know if netperf TCP_RR perf numbers will suffer (assuming TCP_RR is more important than CPU utilization/efficiency on heavy TX loads like pktgen.) grant - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-29 Thread jamal
for tx complete; which makes me wonder: is that "outl(TxENA | inl(ioaddr + cr), ioaddr + cr)" really needed on a per-packet basis? Should it not be sufficient to turn it on once at open()? > Anyway, if I rewrite the driver to use TxOK instead of TxIdle, pktgen > works fine. I

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-28 Thread David Miller
it doesn't interrupt until the entire TX ring is empty and has been sent onto the wire. Yes, this would be exactly sub-optimal for pktgen or in fact any application :-) It seems that the INTbit in the TX descriptor status of the SIS190 can be an interrupt trigger. In that case, a reason

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-28 Thread Mandeep Singh Baines
n that piece of code > once - and iirc you said its because you had to synchronise and make > sure the packet made it to the wire. In this scenario, the packet has > made it to the wire - just hasnt been freed. Note that when teaching > pktgen to do batching, i removed that logic and thi

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-28 Thread jamal
cket made it to the wire. In this scenario, the packet has made it to the wire - just hasnt been freed. Note that when teaching pktgen to do batching, i removed that logic and things work fine. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in th

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-28 Thread Rick Jones
I don't even understand why this needs to be discussed to be honest with you :-) Just my (possibly frustrating :) habit of asking questions which help further my understanding of the code :) rick jones - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-28 Thread David Miller
From: Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 16:48:24 -0700 > Not to defend any one driver, but could it be that the behaviour of TCP > is such that we've not noticed until now? > > Does TCP particularly care for an SKB carrying an ACK? For ones carrying > data there would be an A

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-28 Thread Rick Jones
h uses TX_IDLE (tx state-machine idle) instead of TX_OK (tx completed) as a way of coalescing interrupts. I've also seen another driver which does something similar. Not sure how prevalent this technique is. So is this a bug in the drivers or a bug in pktgen? This is a bug since it can stall

Re: pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-28 Thread David Miller
DLE (tx > state-machine idle) instead of TX_OK (tx completed) as a way of > coalescing interrupts. I've also seen another driver which does > something similar. Not sure how prevalent this technique is. > > So is this a bug in the drivers or a bug in pktgen? This is a bug since it

Re: Remove softirq scheduling from pktgen [PATCH]

2007-08-28 Thread David Miller
From: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 20:22:26 +0200 > Christoph Hellwig writes: > > > > Hello, It's not a job for pktgen. > > > > Please also kill the do_softirq export while you're at it. > > > Right seems li

pktgen terminating condition

2007-08-28 Thread Mandeep Singh Baines
Hi, I am having some trouble using pktgen with certain NICs. When running pktgen on some NICs, the test stalls because the worker thread is waiting for the driver to free the last skb. If a send a few pings out the interface, the worker thread will eventually unblock. Below is the snippet of

Re: Remove softirq scheduling from pktgen [PATCH]

2007-08-28 Thread David Miller
From: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:57:19 +0200 > Hello, It's not a job for pktgen. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks Robert. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev"

Re: pktgen Multiqueue support [PATCH]

2007-08-28 Thread David Miller
From: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:55:19 +0200 > Below some pktgen support to send into different TX queues. > This can of course be feed into input queues on other machines > > Signed-off-by: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks for

Re: pktgen multiqueue oops

2007-08-28 Thread David Miller
From: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:16:19 +0200 > Initially pkt_dev can be NULL this causes netif_subqueue_stopped to > oops. The patch below should cure it. But maybe the pktgen TX logic > should be reworked to better support the new mul

Re: Remove softirq scheduling from pktgen [PATCH]

2007-08-27 Thread Robert Olsson
Christoph Hellwig writes: > > Hello, It's not a job for pktgen. > > Please also kill the do_softirq export while you're at it. Right seems like pktgen luckily was the only user. Cheers --ro Signed-off-by: Robert Olsson <

Re: Remove softirq scheduling from pktgen [PATCH]

2007-08-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 06:57:19PM +0200, Robert Olsson wrote: > > > Hello, It's not a job for pktgen. Please also kill the do_softirq export while you're at it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EM

Remove softirq scheduling from pktgen [PATCH]

2007-08-27 Thread Robert Olsson
Hello, It's not a job for pktgen. Cheers --ro Signed-off-by: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/net/core/pktgen.c b/net/core/pktgen.c index 18601af..975e887 100644 --- a/net/core/pktgen.c +++ b/net/core/pktgen.c @@ -1

pktgen Multiqueue support [PATCH]

2007-08-27 Thread Robert Olsson
Hello, Below some pktgen support to send into different TX queues. This can of course be feed into input queues on other machines Cheers --ro Signed-off-by: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/net/core/pktgen.c b/net/core/pktgen.c

pktgen multiqueue oops

2007-08-27 Thread Robert Olsson
Hello, Initially pkt_dev can be NULL this causes netif_subqueue_stopped to oops. The patch below should cure it. But maybe the pktgen TX logic should be reworked to better support the new multiqueue support. Cheers --ro Signed-off-by: Robert Olsson

Re: [PATCH] pktgen - define and use pktgen_dbg,err,warn,info

2007-07-31 Thread David Miller
From: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:48:06 -0700 > I'd like to see macros added to kernel.h for: > > pr_err > pr_notice > pr_warn > pr_alert > pr_crit > pr_emerge No objections here :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "

Re: [PATCH] pktgen - define and use pktgen_dbg,err,warn,info

2007-07-31 Thread Joe Perches
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 16:05 -0700, David Miller wrote: > I still don't know about this patch. Instead of the simple > transformation: > > - printk(foo); > + printk(KERN_INFO foo); > > we get this new macro, and the lines changes to use that macro. Actually, I agree. Many local macros c

Re: [PATCH] pktgen - define and use pktgen_dbg,err,warn,info

2007-07-30 Thread David Miller
From: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:21:00 -0700 > On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 15:49 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:14:13 -0700 > > > > > -#define VERSION

Re: [PATCH] pktgen - define and use pktgen_dbg,err,warn,info

2007-07-18 Thread Joe Perches
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 15:49 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:14:13 -0700 > > > -#define VERSION "pktgen v2.68: Packet Generator for packet performance > > testing.\n" > > +#define PKTGEN_N

Re: [PATCH] pktgen - define and use pktgen_dbg,err,warn,info

2007-07-18 Thread David Miller
From: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:14:13 -0700 > -#define VERSION "pktgen v2.68: Packet Generator for packet performance > testing.\n" > +#define PKTGEN_NAME"pktgen" > +#define PKTGEN_VERSION "v2.68" > +

[PATCH] pktgen - define and use pktgen_dbg,err,warn,info

2007-07-18 Thread Joe Perches
100644 --- a/net/core/pktgen.c +++ b/net/core/pktgen.c @@ -162,7 +162,10 @@ #include /* do_div */ #include -#define VERSION "pktgen v2.68: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.\n" +#define PKTGEN_NAME"pktgen" +#define PKTGEN_VERSION "v2.68&q

Re: Resend: [PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 4/4: Add IPSEC support to pktgen

2007-07-02 Thread David Miller
From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:08:39 -0400 > commit bfd389bba7654aa118f0949ff0de45a3bce9700c > Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue Jun 12 18:59:33 2007 -0400 > > [PKTGEN] IPSEC support > Added transport

Re: Resend: [PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 3/4: Introduce xfrm SAD only lookup

2007-07-02 Thread David Miller
This allows other in-kernel functions to do SAD lookups. > The only known user at the moment is pktgen. > > Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a me

Re: [PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 2/4: Introduce pktgen sequential flows

2007-07-02 Thread David Miller
From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:01:55 -0400 > commit 882c296bb3f153e1ac770a874c75cfb2bab8481b > Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue Jun 12 07:24:00 2007 -0400 > > [PKTGEN] Introduce sequential flows > >

Re: [PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 1/4: Centralize pktgen packet overhead management

2007-07-02 Thread David Miller
From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:00:28 -0400 > commit 38477d7ddfa58f58cce99bc902b4c18883647a71 > Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue Jun 12 06:43:00 2007 -0400 > > [PKTGEN] Centralize packet overhead tracking &

Resend: [PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 4/4: Add IPSEC support to pktgen

2007-06-12 Thread jamal
Sorry Robert, I found a problem compiling when i turned off XFRM. This fixes it. cheers, jamal commit bfd389bba7654aa118f0949ff0de45a3bce9700c Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue Jun 12 18:59:33 2007 -0400 [PKTGEN] IPSEC support Added transport mode ESP suppo

Resend: [PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 3/4: Introduce xfrm SAD only lookup

2007-06-12 Thread jamal
do SAD lookups. The only known user at the moment is pktgen. Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h index 311f25a..79d2c37 100644 --- a/include/net/xfrm.h +++ b/include/net/xfrm.h @@ -920,6 +920,10 @@ extern struc

Re: [PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 3/4: Introduce xfrm SAD only lookup

2007-06-12 Thread jamal
On Tue, 2007-12-06 at 15:45 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Looks good too me, just a few minor nitpicks as usual :) I like the nitpicks - they make the code better (as long as we put a time limit on them ;->) > > ^^ please delete empty line will do. > > + if (x->km.state !=

Re: [PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 1/4: Centralize pktgen packet overhead management

2007-06-12 Thread jamal
On Tue, 2007-12-06 at 15:21 +0200, Robert Olsson wrote: > >I'll guess the ipsec part is to be considered work-in-progress >and you're doing both the work and the progress. > ;-> Much thanks Robert. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ne

[PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 4/4: Add IPSEC support to pktgen

2007-06-12 Thread Robert Olsson
jamal writes: > 4 of 4 > [PKTGEN] IPSEC support > Added transport mode ESP support for starters. > I will send more of these modes and types once i have resolved > the tunnel mode isses. > > Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 3/4: Introduce xfrm SAD only lookup

2007-06-12 Thread Patrick McHardy
Looks good too me, just a few minor nitpicks as usual :) jamal wrote: > [XFRM] Introduce standalone SAD lookup > > +struct xfrm_state * > +xfrm_stateonly_find(xfrm_address_t *daddr, xfrm_address_t *saddr, > + unsigned short family, u8 mode, u8 proto, u32 reqid) > +{ > + uns

[PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 1/4: Centralize pktgen packet overhead management

2007-06-12 Thread Robert Olsson
jamal writes: > Manual labor still ... 1 of 4 > [PKTGEN] Centralize packet overhead tracking > Track the extra packet overhead for VLAN tags, MPLS, IPSEC etc > > Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks, Jamal. I'

[PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 2/4: Introduce pktgen sequential flows

2007-06-12 Thread Robert Olsson
jamal writes: > 2 of 4 > > cheers, > jamal > commit 882c296bb3f153e1ac770a874c75cfb2bab8481b > Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue Jun 12 07:24:00 2007 -0400 > > [PKTGEN] Introduce sequential flows > > By d

[PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 3/4: Introduce xfrm SAD only lookup

2007-06-12 Thread Robert Olsson
jamal writes: > 3 of 4 .. > [XFRM] Introduce standalone SAD lookup > This allows other in-kernel functions to do SAD lookups. > The only known user at the moment is pktgen. > > Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> xfrm is not

[PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 4/4: Add IPSEC support to pktgen

2007-06-12 Thread jamal
4 of 4 cheers, jamal commit e035613eae587251b8c98b7d503eab207f1d26e2 Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue Jun 12 07:43:30 2007 -0400 [PKTGEN] IPSEC support Added transport mode ESP support for starters. I will send more of these modes and types once

[PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 3/4: Introduce xfrm SAD only lookup

2007-06-12 Thread jamal
at the moment is pktgen. Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h index 311f25a..79d2c37 100644 --- a/include/net/xfrm.h +++ b/include/net/xfrm.h @@ -920,6 +920,10 @@ extern struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_find(xfrm_addre

[PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 2/4: Introduce pktgen sequential flows

2007-06-12 Thread jamal
2 of 4 cheers, jamal commit 882c296bb3f153e1ac770a874c75cfb2bab8481b Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue Jun 12 07:24:00 2007 -0400 [PKTGEN] Introduce sequential flows By default all flows in pktgen are randomly selected. This patch introduces abil

[PATCH] pktgen IPSEC 1/4: Centralize pktgen packet overhead management

2007-06-12 Thread jamal
Manual labor still ... 1 of 4 cheers, jamal commit 38477d7ddfa58f58cce99bc902b4c18883647a71 Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue Jun 12 06:43:00 2007 -0400 [PKTGEN] Centralize packet overhead tracking Track the extra packet overhead for VLAN tags, MPLS, IPS

[PATCH SET] pktgen IPSEC 0/4

2007-06-12 Thread jamal
This is a set of patches that add ipsec functionality to pktgen. It is against Daves net-2.6.23 Robert, please take a closer look at this set and either sign off or comment for me to redo something. I have a short cycle before being busyed out where i can fix things. Dave, I would like to push

[PKTGEN] IPSEC support

2007-06-09 Thread jamal
4 of 4 cheers, jamal commit d1d8ea490a517df484e6774c4f41123ccde52434 Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat Jun 9 09:46:52 2007 -0400 [PKTGEN] IPSEC support Added transport mode ESP support for starters. I will send more of these modes and types once i have re

[PKTGEN] Introduce sequential flows

2007-06-09 Thread jamal
2 of 4. cheers, jamal commit d0d2c0c2e5539a54d66f07d2fa99bb52c19cc698 Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat Jun 9 09:12:21 2007 -0400 [PKTGEN] Introduce sequential flows By default all flows in pktgen are randomly selected. This patch introduces abil

[PKTGEN] Centralize packet overhead tracking

2007-06-09 Thread jamal
1 of 4. cheers, jamal commit f7da845f37e3cd47be46697491210c126b37c8fc Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat Jun 9 09:11:16 2007 -0400 [PKTGEN] Centralize packet overhead tracking Track the extra packet overhead for VLAN tags, MPLS, IPSEC etc Signed-

[RFC] [PATCHES] pktgen IPSEC 0/4

2007-06-09 Thread jamal
This is a set of patches that add ipsec functionality to pktgen. I have lost these patches before - but they are now fully recovered and well tested. Robert has glanced at the patches and seems to have no qualms with them. I am soliciting for any feedback because i would like to push them for

Re: [PATCH] Allow pktgen to work with loopback devices.

2007-03-09 Thread Jeff Garzik
Josh Triplett wrote: pktgen currently only works on network devices with type ARPHRD_ETHER. Add support for the loopback device, type ARPHRD_LOOPBACK. I've tested this on my system, using a modified pktgen.conf-1-1 with s/eth1/lo/g, and it works fine; the network device statistics co

[PATCH] Allow pktgen to work with loopback devices.

2007-03-07 Thread Josh Triplett
pktgen currently only works on network devices with type ARPHRD_ETHER. Add support for the loopback device, type ARPHRD_LOOPBACK. I've tested this on my system, using a modified pktgen.conf-1-1 with s/eth1/lo/g, and it works fine; the network device statistics confirm packet transmissio

Re: [PATCH 4/4] pktgen: fix device name handling

2007-03-02 Thread David Miller
From: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:07:09 +0100 > Yes it seems be handle dev name change. So configuration scripts should > use ifindex now :) > > Signed-off-by: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I will apply all 4 of these patches to net-2.6.22, thanks everyone. -

[PATCH 4/4] pktgen: fix device name handling

2007-02-28 Thread Robert Olsson
+--- > 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) > > --- pktgen.orig/net/core/pktgen.c2007-02-27 12:08:58.0 -0800 > +++ pktgen/net/core/pktgen.c 2007-02-27 12:11:32.0 -0800 > @@ -210,15 +210,11 @@ > }; > &g

[PATCH 3/4] pktgen: don't use __constant_htonl()

2007-02-28 Thread Robert Olsson
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > net/core/pktgen.c | 24 > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > --- pktgen.orig/net/core/pktgen.c2007-02-26 14:40:31.0 -0800 > +++ pktgen/net/core/pktgen.c 200

[PATCH 2/4] pktgen: use random32

2007-02-28 Thread Robert Olsson
ephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > net/core/pktgen.c | 52 > +++- > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > > --- pktgen.orig/net/core/pktgen.c2007-02-26 14:34:36.0 -0800 >

[PATCH 1/4] pktgen: use pr_debug

2007-02-28 Thread Robert Olsson
> --- > net/core/pktgen.c | 34 +++--- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > --- pktgen.orig/net/core/pktgen.c2007-02-26 13:21:54.0 -0800 > +++ pktgen/net/core/pktgen.c 2007-02-26 13:22:04.0 -0800 > @@ -1

[PATCH 4/4] pktgen: fix device name handling

2007-02-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
en.c | 137 +++--- 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) --- pktgen.orig/net/core/pktgen.c 2007-02-27 12:08:58.0 -0800 +++ pktgen/net/core/pktgen.c2007-02-27 12:11:32.0 -0800 @@ -210,15 +210,11 @@ }; struct pktgen_dev { - /*

[PATCH 1/4] pktgen: use pr_debug

2007-02-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
13:21:54.0 -0800 +++ pktgen/net/core/pktgen.c2007-02-26 13:22:04.0 -0800 @@ -163,9 +163,6 @@ #define VERSION "pktgen v2.68: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.\n" -/* #define PG_DEBUG(a) a */ -#define PG_DEBUG(a) - /* The buckets are exponential in &#x

[PATCH 2/4] pktgen: use random32

2007-02-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
-0800 +++ pktgen/net/core/pktgen.c2007-02-26 14:39:53.0 -0800 @@ -464,17 +464,6 @@ return tmp; } -static inline u32 pktgen_random(void) -{ -#if 0 - __u32 n; - get_random_bytes(&n, 4); - return n; -#else - return net_random(); -#endif -} - static in

[PATCH 3/4] pktgen: don't use __constant_htonl()

2007-02-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
ig/net/core/pktgen.c 2007-02-26 14:40:31.0 -0800 +++ pktgen/net/core/pktgen.c2007-02-26 15:36:38.0 -0800 @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ #define LAT_BUCKETS_MAX 32 #define IP_NAME_SZ 32 #define MAX_MPLS_LABELS 16 /* This is the max label stack depth */ -#define MPLS_STACK_

Re: pktgen

2007-01-01 Thread David Miller
give this a spin? I've tested that the module loads and unloads properly, the threads startup and shutdown, but that's it. Thanks! commit b3010a665cc33596fbf4be3fc6c3c5c80aeefb65 Author: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon Jan 1 20:51:53 2007 -0800 [PKTGEN]

Re: [patch] handle pktgen setup in newer kernels in iputils/ipg

2006-12-20 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:09:03 -0500), Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > the ipg script only works with the old "pg3" module and not the new "pktgen" > module ... attached patch updates the ipg script to support bo

[patch] handle pktgen setup in newer kernels in iputils/ipg

2006-12-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
the ipg script only works with the old "pg3" module and not the new "pktgen" module ... attached patch updates the ipg script to support both -mike pgpDCI0UbHEoD.pgp Description: PGP signature Only load modules if kernel supports modules and try a little bit harder to locate

Re: pktgen

2006-12-01 Thread David Miller
e bug completely. But later on we should integate a change that eliminates these spurious t->control bit clears at the start of the pktgen thread execution, it just isn't needed to fix the bug so we can make it later. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: pktgen

2006-12-01 Thread David Miller
From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:22:25 + > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:14:23PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > Agreed. > > > > Robert, please fix this by using a completion so that we can > > wait for the threads to start up, something like this: > > No, tha

Re: pktgen

2006-12-01 Thread Robert Olsson
ine with CPU:s. Only once I noticed that only 2 of 4 threads got started but it could be something else... And the race is hardly seen with any real use of pktgen.. .Let's hear what others... and completions was out-of-date. Cheers. --ro - To

Re: pktgen

2006-12-01 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
used now. Is my "t->control &= ~(T_TERMINATE);" fix deprecated by completions? --- a/net/core/pktgen.c +++ b/net/core/pktgen.c @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -160,7 +161,7 @@ #include/* do_div */ #includ

Re: pktgen

2006-12-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:14:23PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > Agreed. > > Robert, please fix this by using a completion so that we can > wait for the threads to start up, something like this: No, that's wrong aswell :) Please use the kthread_ API that takes care of all this. kernel_thread is

Re: pktgen

2006-12-01 Thread Robert Olsson
e/pktgen.c b/net/core/pktgen.c index 733d86d..a630a73 100644 --- a/net/core/pktgen.c +++ b/net/core/pktgen.c @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -160,7 +161,7 @@ #include /* do_div */ #include -#define VERSION "pkt

Re: pktgen

2006-11-30 Thread David Miller
nit_completion(&started); info.t = t; info.c = &started; err = kernel_thread((void *)pktgen_thread_worker, (void *)t, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES | CLONE_SIGHAND); if (err < 0) { printk("pktgen: kernel_thread() failed for cp

Re: pktgen

2006-11-30 Thread Ben Greear
clude -#define VERSION "pktgen v2.68: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.\n" +#define VERSION "pktgen v2.69: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.\n" /* #define PG_DEBUG(a) a */ #define PG_DEBUG(a) @@ -3673,6 +3673,8 @@ static vo

Re: pktgen

2006-11-30 Thread Robert Olsson
RSION "pktgen v2.68: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.\n" +#define VERSION "pktgen v2.69: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.\n" /* #define PG_DEBUG(a) a */ #define PG_DEBUG(a) @@ -3673,6 +3673,8 @@ static void __exit pg_cleanup(void)

Re: pktgen

2006-11-29 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On 11/30/06, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:04:37 +0300 > Looks like worker thread strategically clears it if scheduled at wrong > moment. > > --- a/net/core/pktgen.c > +++ b/net/core/pktgen.c > @@ -3292,7 +3292,6 @@ st

Re: pktgen

2006-11-29 Thread David Miller
From: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:04:37 +0300 > Looks like worker thread strategically clears it if scheduled at wrong > moment. > > --- a/net/core/pktgen.c > +++ b/net/core/pktgen.c > @@ -3292,7 +3292,6 @@ static void pktgen_thread_worker(struct > > init

Re: pktgen

2006-11-29 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 03:33:25PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:22:51 +0300 > > > [CCing netdev, bug in pktgen] > > > > [build modular pktgen] > > while true; do modprobe pktgen

Re: pktgen

2006-11-28 Thread David Miller
From: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:22:51 +0300 > [CCing netdev, bug in pktgen] > > [build modular pktgen] > while true; do modprobe pktgen && rmmod pktgen; done > > BUG: warning at fs/proc

Re: pktgen patch available for perusal.

2006-11-06 Thread Robert Olsson
Ben Greear writes: > > Changes: > > * use a nano-second timer based on the scheduler timer (TSC) for relative > > times, instead of get_time_of_day. Seems I missed to set tsc as clocksource. It makes a difference. Performance is normal and I'm less confused. e1000 82546GB @ 1.6 GHz Opteron.

Re: pktgen patch available for perusal.

2006-11-06 Thread Robert Olsson
jamal writes: > If you are listening then start with: > > 1) Do a simple test with just udp traffic as above, doing simple > accounting. This helps you to get a feel on how things work. > 2) modify the matching rules to match your magic cookie > 3) write a simple action invoked by your mat

Re: pktgen patch available for perusal.

2006-11-04 Thread Ben Greear
value. Of course you can do this from your application instead of using tc. I think that will be the best place to control this and sync with pktgen sending. You mean the equiv of calling system(tc filter .) from the app, or do you mean something else entirely? the rest can be in a method c

Re: pktgen patch available for perusal.

2006-11-04 Thread jamal
est place to control this and sync with pktgen sending. > the rest can be in a method > called after you match in your script? > If the packet/byte counters that the drop action provides are not good enough, you can write yourself a little module that will do the accounting the way you want

Re: pktgen patch available for perusal.

2006-11-04 Thread Ben Greear
jamal wrote: On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 11:11 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: I'd be thrilled to have the receive logic go into pktgen, even if it was #if 0 with a comment showing how to patch dev.c to get it working. It would make my out-of-tree patch smaller and should help others who are

Re: pktgen patch available for perusal.

2006-11-04 Thread jamal
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 11:11 -0800, Ben Greear wrote: > I'd be thrilled to have the receive logic go into pktgen, even if > it was #if 0 with a comment > showing how to patch dev.c to get it working. It would make my > out-of-tree patch smaller > and should help others wh

Re: pktgen patch available for perusal.

2006-11-03 Thread Ben Greear
e plenty of existing hooks already i.e PRE_ROUTE? For my particular application the hook needs to be right after the bridge hook. My dev.c hook looks like this: #if defined(CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN) || defined(CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN_MODULE) #include "pktgen.h" #warning "Compilin

Re: pktgen patch available for perusal.

2006-11-03 Thread Robert Olsson
oks already i.e PRE_ROUTE? > I don't think that hook is going to be allowed into the kernel, so the > best I was hoping for was to have the code in pktgen with #if 0 and let > users patch their kernel to add the hook... Right so what I was trying to say was rather having #if 0

Re: pktgen patch available for perusal.

2006-11-03 Thread Ben Greear
Robert Olsson wrote: Ben Greear writes: > I'd be thrilled to have the receive logic go into pktgen, even if it was #if 0 with a comment > showing how to patch dev.c to get it working. It would make my out-of-tree patch smaller > and should help others who are doing resea

Re: pktgen patch available for perusal.

2006-11-03 Thread Robert Olsson
Ben Greear writes: > I'd be thrilled to have the receive logic go into pktgen, even if it was #if > 0 with a comment > showing how to patch dev.c to get it working. It would make my out-of-tree > patch smaller > and should help others who are doing research an

Re: pktgen patch available for perusal.

2006-11-01 Thread Ben Greear
Robert Olsson wrote: Ben Greear writes: > I've completed the first pass of my changes to pktgen in 2.6.18. > Many of these features are probably DOA based on previous conversations, > but perhaps this will help someone Thanks. Well sometimes there is a need to capture and

pktgen patch available for perusal.

2006-11-01 Thread Robert Olsson
Ben Greear writes: > I've completed the first pass of my changes to pktgen in 2.6.18. > Many of these features are probably DOA based on previous conversations, > but perhaps this will help someone Thanks. Well sometimes there is a need to capture and drop pkts and variou

pktgen patch available for perusal.

2006-10-30 Thread Ben Greear
I've completed the first pass of my changes to pktgen in 2.6.18. Many of these features are probably DOA based on previous conversations, but perhaps this will help someone Changes: * use a nano-second timer based on the scheduler timer (TSC) for relative times, instead of get_time_o

Re: RFC: Removing busy-spin in pktgen.

2006-10-24 Thread David Miller
From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:34:38 -0700 > It could be a compile-time option, and even if compiled in, it should > only be an if branch on > a pointer. Is there any noticeable performance hit for an if check if > you wrap it with unlikely? It's "just an if te

Re: RFC: Removing busy-spin in pktgen.

2006-10-24 Thread Ben Greear
David Miller wrote: From: Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:16:05 +0200 My first instinct is to avoid the hook in general code and pktgen let spin to only affect testing. Mine too. Why make everyone in the world make that check in netif_wake_queue

Re: RFC: Removing busy-spin in pktgen.

2006-10-24 Thread Ben Greear
Robert Olsson wrote: Ben Greear writes: > I'm planning to re-merge my long-lost pktgen branch with the kernel > tree's pktgen. > > I believe the main difference is that my out-of-tree pktgen does not do the > busy-spin, but waits on a queue for the net-device to w

<    1   2   3   4   5   >