Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-01.txt

Hi, While -00 of this draft was a pure rename from the individual draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount, this version (-01) changes not only the filename of the draft, but also the title of the document and the YANG module. /martin internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft i

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-01.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language of the IETF. Title : YANG Schema Mount Authors : Martin Bjorklund Ladislav Lhotka Fil

Re: [netmod] YANG - Intended-Config & Applied-Config & Derived-State & Operational-state...grrrr... !!

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:28:03AM +, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote: > Hi Juergen, > > Thanks for the clarity. I somewhat agree. Different lifetime shouldn't really > cause any impact. > > One nit, > > When I pull out a configured interface, the operational state of this > interface is gone bu

Re: [netmod] YANG - Intended-Config & Applied-Config & Derived-State & Operational-state...grrrr... !!

Hi Juergen, Thanks for the clarity. I somewhat agree. Different lifetime shouldn't really cause any impact. One nit, When I pull out a configured interface, the operational state of this interface is gone but not the config - if I put the interface back, it should come up configured as before.

Re: [netmod] actions and keyless lists

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 19:04, Per Hedeland wrote: > > On 2016-04-05 22:33, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 05 Apr 2016, at 16:32, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > On 05 Apr 2016, at 11:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Andy Bierman wrote: >> On M

Re: [netmod] kw comments on draft-voit-netmod-yang-mount-requirements

Hi, Martin, Lada, unfortunately I wasn't able to attend the discussion, but I have one comment regarding the "definition" vs "implementation" distinction. Clearly, peer-mount and alias-mount have a definition component to it. This is why the YANG extensions were defined to define mountpoints

Re: [netmod] schema mount issues

On 4/5/2016 1:40 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Ladislav Lhotka > wrote: > > Hi, > > during the NETMOD session yesterday, we didn't have much time to > discuss open issues related to schema mount. So I created three > new issu

Re: [netmod] actions and keyless lists

On 2016-04-05 22:33, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> On 05 Apr 2016, at 16:32, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >> >> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >>> On 05 Apr 2016, at 11:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Andy Bierman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> >>

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-00.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language of the IETF. Title : YANG Structural Mount Author : Martin Bjorklund Filename: draft-ietf-netmod-schem

Re: [netmod] actions and keyless lists

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 16:32, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 05 Apr 2016, at 11:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> >>> Andy Bierman wrote: On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> On 04 Apr 2016, at 16:15, Andy Bierman wrote:

Re: [netmod] actions and keyless lists

Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 05 Apr 2016, at 11:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > Andy Bierman wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > >>> > On 04 Apr 2016, at 16:15, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Lad

Re: [netmod] actions and keyless lists

Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > I just noticed a typo in fourth paragraph of sec. 7.15: > > s/an the top-level/at the top-level/ Thanks, fixed. /martin > > Lada > > > On 05 Apr 2016, at 13:52, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > >> > >> On 05 Apr 2016, at 11:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >> > >> A

Re: [netmod] schema mount issues

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 14:40, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi, > > during the NETMOD session yesterday, we didn't have much time to discuss open > issues related to schema mount. So I created three new issues in the GitHub > project: >

Re: [netmod] schema mount issues

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi, > > during the NETMOD session yesterday, we didn't have much time to discuss > open issues related to schema mount. So I created three new issues in the > GitHub project: > > https://github.com/netmod-wg/schema-mount/issues > > Please

[netmod] schema mount issues

Hi, during the NETMOD session yesterday, we didn't have much time to discuss open issues related to schema mount. So I created three new issues in the GitHub project: https://github.com/netmod-wg/schema-mount/issues Please express your opinion there. Thanks, Lada -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC L

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis - 2 comments for your consideration

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote: > > 1) It would be useful to expand section 4.3 a bit more to add another > example of the tree with some specifics that cater to most of the protocols > work being done in other WGs. Something along the line of the following: > >

Re: [netmod] actions and keyless lists

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > On 05 Apr 2016, at 11:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Andy Bierman wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 04 Apr 2016, at 16:15, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Ladislav L

Re: [netmod] actions and keyless lists

I just noticed a typo in fourth paragraph of sec. 7.15: s/an the top-level/at the top-level/ Lada > On 05 Apr 2016, at 13:52, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> >> On 05 Apr 2016, at 11:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >> >> Andy Bierman wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrot

Re: [netmod] actions and keyless lists

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 11:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Andy Bierman wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 04 Apr 2016, at 16:15, Andy Bierman wrote: On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > On 04 Apr 201

[netmod] rfc6087bis - 2 comments for your consideration

1) It would be useful to expand section 4.3 a bit more to add another example of the tree with some specifics that cater to most of the protocols work being done in other WGs. Something along the line of the following: Config (intended) State (derived with or without applied)

Re: [netmod] actions and keyless lists

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:09 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Andy Bierman wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 04 Apr 2016, at 16:15, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Ladislav Lhotka > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [netmod] actions and keyless lists

Andy Bierman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > > > On 04 Apr 2016, at 16:15, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > > > > On 04 Apr 2016, at 15:57, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > >

Re: [netmod] kw comments on draft-voit-netmod-yang-mount-requirements

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 06:38, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Hi, > > Kent Watsen wrote: >> [As a contributor] >> >> Note: this is a -00 document, but only because the draft's name >> changed. In reality this is like a >> draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-04. Looking at the diffs, >> ther

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount-02 as draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount

This poll is complete and the document is adopted, Authors, Please resubmit the draft with the only change being to rename the draft to draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-00 Thank you! Lou (and co-chairs) On 3/21/2016 12:17 PM, Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on maki

Re: [netmod] kw comments on draft-voit-netmod-yang-mount-requirements

Hi, Kent Watsen wrote: > [As a contributor] > > Note: this is a -00 document, but only because the draft's name > changed. In reality this is like a > draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-04. Looking at the diffs, > there aren't many changes, mostly cleanup and adding the "schema > mount"

Re: [netmod] a few editorial comments on structural-mount-02

Hi Jason, "Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA)" wrote: > Hello, > > A couple of minor points for the structural mount draft that I > noticed while reading it recently: > > The XML instance data in Appendix B seems to have inside the > context but that doesn't match the YANG model above it. You're ri