Re: [netmod] Tokenizing and strings (was: Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12 (part 2))

I think we should consider this for a future version of YANG but not now. I am not aware what implementors had problems to implement YANG strings in YANG 1 or YANG 1.1 and we are at a point in the process where I like to not run the risk to make bigger changes to the specification that may turn out

Re: [netmod] Tokenizing and strings

Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > I think we should consider this for a future version of YANG but not > now. I am not aware what implementors had problems to implement YANG > strings in YANG 1 or YANG 1.1 and we are at a point in the process > where I like to not run the risk to make bigger changes

Re: [netmod] Tokenizing and strings

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:00:53AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > However, there is one thing below that I'd like to clarify: > > > > *** Hmmm, is an unaccompanied CR allowed in an unquoted string? If > > > so, "ordinary-char" and my previous text regarding line breaks need > > > to be amended.

Re: [netmod] Tokenizing and strings

> On 10 Jun 2016, at 10:00, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: >> I think we should consider this for a future version of YANG but not >> now. I am not aware what implementors had problems to implement YANG >> strings in YANG 1 or YANG 1.1 and we are at a point in the proc

Re: [netmod] Tokenizing and strings

> -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dale R. > Worley > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 12:04 AM > To: Martin Bjorklund > Cc: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: [netmod] Tokenizing and strings (was: Gen-ART IETF Last Call > review > of draft-ietf-netmod-rf

Re: [netmod] Tokenizing and strings

> -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jernej Tuljak > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 10:46 AM > To: 'Dale R. Worley' ; 'Martin Bjorklund' f.com> > Cc: netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] Tokenizing and strings > > > -Original Message- >

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-13.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language of the IETF. Title : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language Author : Martin Bjorklund Filename: draft-iet

Re: [netmod] Comments on draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-02

Hi Cullen, Generic answer to your message: please send text. More specifics below. On 6/7/16 11:57 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote: > I like how this is evolving ... few things > > Few small things > > If you use CMS, I think you need to deal with how the JSON in canonicalized > before being s

[netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

Hi, Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the IESG process. A big thanks in particular to our gen-art and ops-dir reviewers and to Martin for following up on the issues. Please check the edits do make sure

[netmod] draft-schoenw-netmod-revised-datastores-00

Juergen, Page 6 s/have proprietary mechanism/have proprietary mechanisms Page 9 s/in a configuration datastores/in a configuration datastore s/An example are/An example is Section 6.2 I have not been following developments with RESTCONF, but could the “content” query parameter also be used to a

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

Thank you Jürgen and Martin. The document really improved IMO. Regards, Benoit Hi, Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the IESG process. A big thanks in particular to our gen-art and ops-dir reviewers

Re: [netmod] draft-schoenw-netmod-revised-datastores-00

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:45:17PM +0100, Jonathan Hansford wrote: > Juergen, > > Page 6 > s/have proprietary mechanism/have proprietary mechanisms > > Page 9 > s/in a configuration datastores/in a configuration datastore > s/An example are/An example is Thanks. > Section 6.2 > I have not been

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

Hi, I don't want to open a new round of discussion about the leafref issue, but I think the text in sec. 9.9 isn't correct: - The first paragraph says that "path" refers to a leaf or leaf-list schema node - OK. - The second paragraph then says: If the "require-instance" property (Section 9

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi, > > I don't want to open a new round of discussion about the leafref > issue, but I think the text in sec. 9.9 isn't correct: > > - The first paragraph says that "path" refers to a leaf or leaf-list > - schema node - OK. > > - The second paragraph then says: > >

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

> On 10 Jun 2016, at 15:48, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I don't want to open a new round of discussion about the leafref >> issue, but I think the text in sec. 9.9 isn't correct: >> >> - The first paragraph says that "path" refers to a leaf or leaf-list >>

Re: [netmod] [OPSAWG] Comments on draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-02

Canonicalization is the way to avoid file content being mangled or represented differently by different (software) entities that try to create or verify digital signature over it. It doesn't matter if your file is binary or not. And CMS by itself won't save you either.‎ This problem (ensuring th

Re: [netmod] [OPSAWG] Comments on draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-02

Hi Uri, On 6/10/16 5:48 PM, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL wrote: > Canonicalization is the way to avoid file content being mangled or > represented differently by different (software) entities that try to create > or verify digital signature over it. It doesn't matter if your file is binary >

Re: [netmod] [OPSAWG] Comments on draft-lear-ietf-netmod-mud-02

Just "encoding" is not enough - it's *how exactly*‎ the file is encoded. Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.   Original Message   From: Eliot Lear Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 13:04 To: Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL; Cullen Jennings; ops...@ietf.org; netm

[netmod] YANG 1.1: must-stmt evaluation in input, output, notification

Hi, I am trying to implement YANG 1.1 must-stmt extensions. They appear to be under-specified. In sec. 7.5.3 The XPath expression is conceptually evaluated in the following context, in addition to the definition in Section 6.4.1