Re: [netmod] draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores-00

2016-11-14 Thread Martin Bjorklund
"Susan Hares" wrote: > > > Feedback to presenter. > > > > You indicated that ephemeral was dynamic protocols, but that DCHP was > configuration protocols. The text indicates that the ephemeral state is a > control-plane datastore, The architecure allows for new control-plane datastores to

Re: [netmod] comments on revised-datastores-00

2016-11-14 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 09:48:35AM +0900, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Juergen Schoenwaelder writes: > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:23:04AM +0900, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've read the revised-datastores-00 document, in general I like it, here > >> are my initial comments and que

[netmod] draft-nmdsdt-netmod-revised-datastores-00

2016-11-14 Thread Susan Hares
Feedback to presenter. You indicated that ephemeral was dynamic protocols, but that DCHP was configuration protocols. The text indicates that the ephemeral state is a control-plane datastore, We should be able to have 2 ephemeral datastores which are control-plane datastores. The tracki

Re: [netmod] syslog-model-11 single buffer vs list

2016-11-14 Thread Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA)
Hi Clyde, Most implementations probably have limits in the # of files, remote destinations, etc they will support. If vendors decide to augment the model to add max-elements then they'd do it for a number of the lists here. That doesn't seem like a big deal. But trying to fit into a model wi

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09 (until Oct 27, 2016)

2016-11-14 Thread Dean Bogdanovic
I have something that might delay WGLC, but found out an optimization which would help in the future In ietf-packet-fields.yang, example below grouping acl-ipv4-header-fields { description "Fields in IPv4 header."; leaf destination-ipv4-network { type inet:ipv4-prefix; descr

Re: [netmod] comments on revised-datastores-00

2016-11-14 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Juergen Schoenwaelder writes: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:23:04AM +0900, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've read the revised-datastores-00 document, in general I like it, here >> are my initial comments and questions: >> >> 1. Even if is valid, it can still be in conflict with the >>

Re: [netmod] comments on revised-datastores-00

2016-11-14 Thread Susan Hares
Martin: Thank you. As usual, your answer is clear and enables me to work on the next steps of coding and standardization. I'd love to talk off-list on how I've merged to I2RS RIB ephemeral control protocol data store and Netconf intended datastore in a prototype in the CONFD code. Sue --

Re: [netmod] comments on revised-datastores-00

2016-11-14 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 01:42:18PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote: > Hi, > > How do the YANG validation rules for datastores apply to this new framework? > The YANG RFC just refers to a 'valid' datastore. Is validation ever done > on the 'intended' datastore, or just 'running' (what we have now). Note

Re: [netmod] comments on revised-datastores-00

2016-11-14 Thread Andy Bierman
Hi, How do the YANG validation rules for datastores apply to this new framework? The YANG RFC just refers to a 'valid' datastore. Is validation ever done on the 'intended' datastore, or just 'running' (what we have now). The framework you propose seems reasonable but the real issues show up in th

Re: [netmod] comments on revised-datastores-00

2016-11-14 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi, "Susan Hares" wrote: > Juergen and Lada: > > #2 - is interesting to me. Is dynamic configuration protocol = I2RS? Or > control-plane protocols = I2RS? Details tbd, but this architecture allows for a new kind of datastore ("control-plane datastore") which could be defined for i2rs. > On

Re: [netmod] comments on revised-datastores-00

2016-11-14 Thread Susan Hares
Juergen and Lada: #2 - is interesting to me. Is dynamic configuration protocol = I2RS? Or control-plane protocols = I2RS? On #5 - how do you merge I2RS RIB static routes + routing-configuration rib routes? Can you see the difference in the applied configuration? Thanks, Sue -Origina

Re: [netmod] syslog-model-11 single buffer vs list

2016-11-14 Thread Clyde Wildes (cwildes)
Hi Jason, Buffer was a subject of discussion on the netmod list most recently by Tom Petch who raised some questions. In an e-mail on 2016/5/6 Tom said: “The description of log-buffer confuses me. The buffer is circular in nature so there is only one of them; but it is a list keyed on 'name' s

[netmod] agenda updated

2016-11-14 Thread Kent Watsen
Updates: - Andy Bierman is now presenting the entity draft - Dean Bogdanovic is presenting the Routing Area DT Update - Clyde Wildes is now presenting -11 (not -09) - the presentation of the alarm draft has been removed - the time-slot for session 2 has been corrected https://www.ietf.o

Re: [netmod] comments on revised-datastores-00

2016-11-14 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:23:04AM +0900, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi, > > I've read the revised-datastores-00 document, in general I like it, here > are my initial comments and questions: > > 1. Even if is valid, it can still be in conflict with the >actual content of that may come from e.