Re: [netmod] modelling of packet-action WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-11

2017-08-17 Thread Kristian Larsson
Pardon my ignorance as this might have been asked before but why is the actions/packet-handling modelled as a choice? It would seem an identity would be better or perhaps even an enum? kll On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 06:34:28PM +, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > This is a notice to start a three

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-16.txt

2017-08-17 Thread Clyde Wildes (cwildes)
Tom, I am working with Mahesh to fix the Normative References. Regarding line length: I am using pyang 1.7.3 which is not complaining about line length in the model. But when I look at the draft I see that both the tree and the model exceed 80 characters. I will make a pass to shorten lines.

Re: [netmod] What is the best way to HW identities

2017-08-17 Thread Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
Hi Martin, Using this feedback, there is a basis to continue the work in BBF What is the best way to continue with the sub-classes w.r.t. IANA, who needs to initiate this? Your reply seems to suggest that irrespective of this email, still something was required? Anyhow, BBF can define

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-11

2017-08-17 Thread Kristian Larsson
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:11:48PM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 04:18:47PM +0200, Lou Berger wrote: > > All, > > > > Per our discussion in today's session, another version of this draft > > is needed to address open issues. As this revision will include > >

Re: [netmod] What is the best way to HW identities

2017-08-17 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi, "Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" wrote: > Hello, > > > > Within BBF we have had a discussion on the use of > draft-ietf-netmod-entity-03, and we would appreciate to hear the opinion of > IETF. More specific the discussion is on the use of the leaf 'class' and

[netmod] What is the best way to HW identities

2017-08-17 Thread Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
Hello, Within BBF we have had a discussion on the use of draft-ietf-netmod-entity-03, and we would appreciate to hear the opinion of IETF. More specific the discussion is on the use of the leaf 'class' and the leaf 'parent-rel-pos'. First some BBF context: - the systems for which BBF