To a user of the schema-mount, it is important to be able to visualize all key
elements of the mounting mechanism: mount-point, mounted schema module, and
parent-reference. The details can be worked out, but if any of these elements
were not useful in the presentation, it would be questionable
"Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote:
> Martin, Lada, et al,
>
> While I don’t think we need additional annotations that Joe had prototyped
> (at least not as the default), I strongly believe we need to keep the ‘@‘
> and ‘/‘ in the tree output for schema mount.
Can you explain what
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks,
Yingzhen
-Original Message-
From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 6:56 AM
To: Lou Berger ; Ladislav Lhotka ; Yingzhen Qu
Martin, Lada, et al,
While I don’t think we need additional annotations that Joe had prototyped
(at least not as the default), I strongly believe we need to keep the ‘@‘
and ‘/‘ in the tree output for schema mount. While the former enhancement
provided details, the schema mount tree designations
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Martin Bjorklund píše v Po 25. 09. 2017 v 11:57 +0200:
> > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > Robert Wilton píše v Čt 21. 09. 2017 v 10:38 +0100:
> >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > Yes, I agree that this scenario is very likely, but I think that the
Martin Bjorklund píše v Po 25. 09. 2017 v 11:57 +0200:
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > Robert Wilton píše v Čt 21. 09. 2017 v 10:38 +0100:
>
>
> [...]
>
> > > Yes, I agree that this scenario is very likely, but I think that the
>
> > > solution here is just to not mark the leaf