Robert Wilton writes:
>ii) However, as far as I can see, it doesn't make sense for an action to
>directly affect the contents of any configuration datastore, that should
>be done via a purpose built rpc (like edit-config).
An example action would be to retrieve the fingerprint of an ssh
key. I
Hi Alex,
Thank you for your review of the draft and thoughtful comments, sincerely
appreciated.
Sorry for the delay, please find my answers and notes in-line tagged DXJ>>.
Regards,
Xiaojian
-邮件原件-
发件人: Alex Campbell [mailto:alex.campb...@aviatnet.com]
发送时间: 2017年10月27日 6:30
收件人: dingxi
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
Title : A YANG Data Model for Routing Management (NDMA
Version)
Authors : Ladislav Lhotka
Hi,
I'm working on adding NETCONF support for configuring network on a few
management interfaces of our product, a random network appliance. I would
prefer not to reinvent this particular wheel, so I started searching for
existing models. I was surprised that it seems that all vendors essential
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
Title : A YANG Data Model for Routing Management (NDMA
Version)
Authors : Ladislav Lhotka
Hi Rob,
A few comments, inline
--- Alex
From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Wilton
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 7:14 AM
To: Martin Bjorklund ; a...@yumaworks.com; netmod@ietf.org;
Randy Presuhn
Subject: Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements
Hi,
Here is anot
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Randy Presuhn <
randy_pres...@alumni.stanford.edu> wrote:
> Hi -
>
> On 10/31/2017 10:14 AM, Andy Bierman wrote:
> ...
>
>> The system side effects are irrelevant, but both the same for rpc and
>> action.
>>
>
> Knowing what the system side effects are is *ESSENTI
Hi -
On 10/31/2017 10:14 AM, Andy Bierman wrote:
...
The system side effects are irrelevant, but both the same for rpc and
action.
Knowing what the system side effects are is *ESSENTIAL* if these
things are to be of any use operationally.
The only issues relevant to YANG are:
- datastore
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Andy Bierman wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Randy Presuhn <
> > randy_pres...@alumni.stanford.edu> wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > The is not really in a datastore at all.
> > It may have input and output parameters with leafref
On 31/10/2017 15:14, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 02:14:20PM +, Robert Wilton wrote:
Is always the right datastore to evaluate RPC input/output
data relative to? For most RPCs this seems to be the right choice by
default but it also seems plausible that someone m
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 03:35:38PM +, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> > 6.2 Invocation of RPC Operations
> >
> > This section updates section 7.14 of RFC 7950.
> >
> > RPCs MAY be defined as affecting the contents of a specific datastore,
> > any configuration datastore (e.g., ), or
On 31/10/2017 15:35, Kent Watsen wrote:
Hi Robert,
6.2 Invocation of RPC Operations
This section updates section 7.14 of RFC 7950.
RPCs MAY be defined as affecting the contents of a specific datastore,
any configuration datastore (e.g., ), or any datastore
(e.g., ). The RPC definition spec
Hi Robert,
> 6.2 Invocation of RPC Operations
>
> This section updates section 7.14 of RFC 7950.
>
> RPCs MAY be defined as affecting the contents of a specific datastore,
> any configuration datastore (e.g., ), or any datastore
> (e.g., ). The RPC definition specifies how the RPC input
>
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 02:14:20PM +, Robert Wilton wrote:
> Is always the right datastore to evaluate RPC input/output
> data relative to? For most RPCs this seems to be the right choice by
> default but it also seems plausible that someone may wish to define an RPC
> that wants to validate
This poll is now closed.
draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03 is adopted.
Authors, as discussed below, please resubmit acee-03 as ietf-00.
Since the submission window has closed, the chairs will ask for
a submission-exception. Please, shortly after submitting the
-00, submit a -01 per below (essen
Hi,
Here is another attempt for proposed text for Actions/RPC statements in
NMDA.
6.2 Invocation of RPC Operations
This section updates section 7.14 of RFC 7950.
RPCs MAY be defined as affecting the contents of a specific datastore,
any configuration datastore (e.g., ), or any datastore
(e
Re-posted from OPSAWG list :
Hello,
In the file
ietf-access-control-l...@2017-10-03.yang
I see that access-lists is directly defined as a collection.
May I suggest making a grouping (say access-lists-grouping) and use a
"uses" statement in access-lists.
The use-case for this change request
So this version of the draft contains the small change that defines
"datastore schema" and describes the "datastore schema" of
as being the superset of the datastore schema for all the configuration
datastores.
There are two remaining issues open on the issue tracker
(https://github.com/netm
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:47:54AM +0100, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Hi Kristian,
>
> Just my view below:
>
>
> On 10/31/17 11:25 AM, Kristian Larsson wrote:
>
> > This brings us to the acl-type. It seems to me that this is
> > primarily for being able to do YANG validation when a device does
> > NOT
Hi Kristian,
Just my view below:
On 10/31/17 11:25 AM, Kristian Larsson wrote:
> This brings us to the acl-type. It seems to me that this is
> primarily for being able to do YANG validation when a device does
> NOT support a unified model. I.e. if Linux nftables was all we
> wanted to model, th
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:37:04PM +, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> This starts a two-week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14.
>
> The working group last call ends on November 3.
> Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.
I initially read this draft
21 matches
Mail list logo
