Re: [netmod] schema mount and YANG library

Hi Lou, in my view, we should do the following two (significant) changes: 1. Instead of borrowing a grouping from ietf-yang-library and having a parallel list of mounted schemas, we should keep *all* mounted schemas directly in the YANG library and refer to them from schema-mounts structures.

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis shepherd writeup issues

Hi, I am unaware of any IPR for the rfc6087bis draft Andy On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: > Hi Andy, > > > 1) before I forget, could you please confirm one more time (the last time > being in 2016, sheesh!) that you are unaware of any IPR that needs

[netmod] rfc6087bis shepherd writeup issues

Hi Andy, 1) before I forget, could you please confirm one more time (the last time being in 2016, sheesh!) that you are unaware of any IPR that needs to be filed for this draft, according to BCPs 78 and 79? 2) Idnits found three warnings, only the first might require thought for how best

Re: [netmod] schema mount and YANG library

Lada/Martin, I don't believe we reached closure on this discussion.  The open issues relate to proposed new text (slightly modified): at the end of the section [3.2] adding a new paragraph along the lines of:   The use of mount points does not impact the nature of the   mounted data or in

Re: [netmod] WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Hi, I have reviewed and implemented (apart from schema mount specific functionality) draft-ietfetf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-04 and found the following issues: ==sec 2.6.  Node Representation== 1. To correctly reflect the current pyang output one needs to add '--' between and . OLD:    

[netmod] Protocol Action: 'Network Management Datastore Architecture' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-10.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Network Management Datastore Architecture' (draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-10.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Network Modeling Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari and Benoit Claise. A

[netmod] Protocol Action: 'A YANG Data Model for IP Management' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-03.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document: - 'A YANG Data Model for IP Management' (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-03.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Network Modeling Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari and Benoit Claise. A URL of this

Re: [netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

On 15/01/2018 15:26, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Robert Wilton wrote: Hi Martin, All OK with me except where I have further comments/questions inline below: On 15/01/2018 14:39, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Hi, Thanks for the review! Comments inline. Robert Wilton

Re: [netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Rob, Thanks for all the helpful feedback! On 01/15/2018 10:07 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: ... >> NEW: >> >>    If the node is augmented into the tree from another module, >>    its name is printed as :, where is the >>    prefix defined in the module where the node is defined.

Re: [netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Robert Wilton wrote: > Hi Martin, > > All OK with me except where I have further comments/questions inline > below: > > On 15/01/2018 14:39, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for the review! Comments inline. > > > > Robert Wilton wrote: > >>

Re: [netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Hi Rob, On 1/15/18, 10:07 AM, "netmod on behalf of Robert Wilton -X (rwilton - ENSOFT LIMITED at Cisco)" wrote: >Hi Martin, > >All OK with me except where I have further comments/questions inline >below: > >On 15/01/2018 14:39, Martin

Re: [netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Hi Martin, All OK with me except where I have further comments/questions inline below: On 15/01/2018 14:39, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Hi, Thanks for the review! Comments inline. Robert Wilton wrote: Hi Lou, Martin I've done a quick review of draft -04. It looks well

Re: [netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Hi, Thanks for the review! Comments inline. Robert Wilton wrote: > Hi Lou, Martin > > I've done a quick review of draft -04. > > It looks well written to me. > > I have a spotted a few minor nits/questions. > > Section 1: > > (i) "Such diagrams are commonly used to

Re: [netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Hi Lou, Martin I've done a quick review of draft -04. It looks well written to me. I have a spotted a few minor nits/questions. Section 1: (i) "Such diagrams are commonly used to provided " => "Such diagrams are used to provide"? (ii) "This document provides the syntax used in YANG Tree

Re: [netmod] WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Hi, I agree with all of Benoit's points below. On 13/01/2018 14:08, Benoit Claise wrote: Hi Tom, IMO, the best to proceed is exactly like done in the RIP draft. Some sections 2.* explains how the module was build, based one excerpts of the tree diagram. Yes, smaller chunks of tree output can

Re: [netmod] hi Martin, one issue about RFC7950 7.20.3.2. The "deviate" Statement, please help to confirm

Hi, This is an issue that has been reported before. It is tracked in https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues/14. This said, I think in this particular case, where you define both the when expression and the if-feature leaf, I think the correct solution is to ensure that the when