On 27/04/18 12:03, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>>> This is true. We used to do this before yang-data was available.
>> If I remember correctly, the stuff was inside groupings that were not used
>> anywhere.
> Which doesn't quite work, since no namespace is attached to the nodes.
>
True, but that is c
On 27/04/18 12:03, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>> It would be great to remove NETCONF specifics from YANG and I'd be willing to
>> contribute to this work.
> This is a different topic though.
+1 and count me in, please.
Thanks,
Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
