Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to ht
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 11:19 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 10:56:48AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:42 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 06
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 10:56:48AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:42 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 09:42:39AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > >
> > > IMO the 4 separate ways to identify the schema are
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:42 AM Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 09:42:39AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> >
> > IMO the 4 separate ways to identify the schema are 3 too many, but that
> > is what the WG wants. It seems obvious that any
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 09:42:39AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
> IMO the 4 separate ways to identify the schema are 3 too many, but that
> is what the WG wants. It seems obvious that any reader of the file
> has to implement all 4 methods and any writer of the file is free to pick
> just one.
>
Hi -
From: netmod on behalf of Michael Richardson
Sent: 05 July 2021 21:40
Randy Presuhn wrote:
> In ltru the I-Ds contained both material for publication
> in the RFC as well as a *massive* amount of material for
> population of the IANA language tag registry. We needed
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 8:14 AM Rob Wilton (rwilton)
wrote:
> Hi Balazs,
>
> To follow up with our conversation earlier. Andy and Juergen explicitly
> copied because they may have previously commented on these issues during WG
> LC.
>
> I think that my comment regarding the "feature statement" an
Hi Balazs,
To follow up with our conversation earlier. Andy and Juergen explicitly copied
because they may have previously commented on these issues during WG LC.
I think that my comment regarding the "feature statement" and the flexibility
of the inline-method are closely related. I find the
The only change here is a revision bump to keep the draft alive as work
continues on the overall solution documents.
Joe
On 7/6/21 09:40, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Network
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
Title : YANG Module Versioning Requirements
Author : Joe Clarke
Filename: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-ve
From: netmod on behalf of Michael Richardson
Sent: 05 July 2021 21:40
Randy Presuhn wrote:
> In ltru the I-Ds contained both material for publication
> in the RFC as well as a *massive* amount of material for
> population of the IANA language tag registry. We needed
> it in I-
From: netmod on behalf of Michael Richardson
Sent: 05 July 2021 21:40
Randy Presuhn wrote:
> In ltru the I-Ds contained both material for publication
> in the RFC as well as a *massive* amount of material for
> population of the IANA language tag registry. We needed
> it in I-
12 matches
Mail list logo
