From: netmod on behalf of Jeffrey Haas
Sent: 03 October 2022 20:41
[I had promised Mahesh that I'd take my comments here, but I realize that this
is a topic that likely will result in no short term solutions. It may also
result in no action whatsoever.]
YANG strings are bounded in length, the
Dne 05. 10. 22 v 12:01 tom petch napsal(a):
From: netmod on behalf of Jeffrey Haas
Sent: 03 October 2022 20:41
[I had promised Mahesh that I'd take my comments here, but I realize that this
is a topic that likely will result in no short term solutions. It may also
result in no action what
Lada,
> On Oct 5, 2022, at 7:03 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> I would still be against setting a hard limit in YANG itself, primarily
> because it is not clear what this general limit should be. Module authors
> might of course consider restricting key length to something that is
> appropria
Hi Jeff,
From: yang-doctors on behalf of Jeff Haas
Date: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 9:53 AM
To: Ladislav Lhotka
Cc: tom petch , "netmod@ietf.org" , YANG
Doctors
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [netmod] Length on keys in YANG
Lada,
On Oct 5, 2022, at 7:03 AM, Ladislav Lhotka
mailto:ladisla
Acee,
> On Oct 5, 2022, at 10:18 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
> It may even be a matter of having a few useful typedefs:
>
> yang-key32 (length 1..32)
> yang-key64 (length 1..64)
> yang-key128 (length 1..128)
> yang-key256 (length 1..256)
>
> I agree in principle. Why wouldn’t these be s
Jeff,
From: Jeff Haas
Date: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 10:25 AM
To: Acee Lindem
Cc: Ladislav Lhotka , tom petch ,
"netmod@ietf.org" , YANG Doctors
Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [netmod] Length on keys in YANG
Acee,
On Oct 5, 2022, at 10:18 AM, Acee Lindem (acee)
mailto:a...@cisco.com>> w
Acee,
> On Oct 5, 2022, at 10:27 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
>
> I'm supremely uninterested in the color of the bike shed. :-) I find minor
> value is having the word "key" present to cover the use case, but certainly
> could see use cases where a leaf might also want to limit the content
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 4:03 AM Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
>
> Dne 05. 10. 22 v 12:01 tom petch napsal(a):
> > From: netmod on behalf of Jeffrey Haas <
> jh...@pfrc.org>
> > Sent: 03 October 2022 20:41
> >
> > [I had promised Mahesh that I'd take my comments here, but I realize
> that this
> > is a
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:53:23AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
> The length "64" is not random.
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7950.html#section-6.2
>
Note the difference between specifying a aaximum length and soecifying
a minimum length that must be supported.
/js
--
Jürgen Schönwälder
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 2:07 PM Jürgen Schönwälder <
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:53:23AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> >
> > The length "64" is not random.
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7950.html#section-6.2
> >
>
> Note the difference between sp
10 matches
Mail list logo