On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 6:52 PM Balázs Lengyel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While I fully agree with Jason’s comments, I would like to state both as
> an Ericsson guy and as a 3GPP delegate that for us Key issue 2 (multiple
> label schemes) is not important. The only important point is that it should
>
Hello,
While I fully agree with Jason's comments, I would like to state both as an
Ericsson guy and as a 3GPP delegate that for us Key issue 2 (multiple label
schemes) is not important. The only important point is that it should be
settled fast and thus not delay the acceptance of the
Hello Andy,
I assume you are referring to the sentence “A new module revision MAY contain
NBC changes” from the versioning draft.
IMHO the authors agree that NBC changes are bad. They should be allowed but
discouraged.
Would a sentence like
“A new module revision MAY but SHOULD NOT contain NBC
Hi,
OLD:
A new module revision MAY contain NBC changes, e.g., the semantics of
an existing data-node
definition MAY be changed in an NBC manner without requiring a new
data-node definition with
a new identifier.
NEW:
A new module revision SHOULD NOT contain NBC changes,
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 5:08 PM Balázs Lengyel
wrote:
> Hello Andy,
>
> In 3GPP we have endless debates about what is a bugfix. If the
> functionality will not work it is a bugfix. If it works in a bad way it is
> or maybe not a bugfix. If it works just in an ugly way is it a bugfix?
>
>
Hello,
I am writing this as
- Balazs Lengyel one of the authors, but also as
- an Ericsson guy and also as
- a delegate of 3GPP, which requested a better versioning scheme in a reasonably
fast timeline. 3GPP represents both vendors and operators, so in this last
role I am sitting on both side
Hello Andy,
In 3GPP we have endless debates about what is a bugfix. If the functionality
will not work it is a bugfix. If it works in a bad way it is or maybe not a
bugfix. If it works just in an ugly way is it a bugfix?
Conclusion: it is not possible to define clear criteria about what is a bug
The NETMOD WG has placed draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Lou Berger)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits/
Comment:
IPR call
Authors,
I may have missed it, but was the point below addressed?
On 7/3/2023 2:23 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
YANG authors should not need to tag nodes with specific metrics at all.
I am not convinced that standard tags like "counter," or "loss," or
"delay" are useful.
IMO it would be better to
I have written a blog post on YANG versioning summarizing concerns
about the current proposal and outlining a possible path towards a
minimal solution.
https://www.beadg.de/js/post/yang-versioning-update/
This post references an earlier post I wrote about three years ago.
10 matches
Mail list logo
