Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-openconfig-netmod-model-catalog

Thanks Lou. Regarding draft-openconfig-netmod-model-catalog: No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft . -- Anees On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Lou Berger wrote: > > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As part of preparation for WG Adoption > > Are you aware of

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.0 behavior for leafref

Isn't there already a verified errata for this same issue with the same recommendation (Errata ID: 2949) ? -- Anees On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > Hi, > > The leafref text was changed to allow the require-instance-stmt in YANG 1.1 > > RFC 6020, sec.

Re: [netmod] YANG coordination feedback on draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01

Benoit, I think Rob and others have already addressed the first issue raised in the comments from your group. For the second point, your mail says that the OpenConfig opstate draft says: * "The proposal does not allow items that are not configured, configured but not present, or system

Re: [netmod] Open Config Options

We've posted a new version of our draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01 It includes a section on the issues that were raised and our observation/comment. It also adds a detailed section on terminology based on the interim calls, and updates the operational