[netmod] exchange of messages between the OPS Area and IEEE 802.1 on VLAN YANG models

Hi, On 7/21 Benoit Claise (OPS AD) sent a message to the IEEE 802.1 WG concerning the VLAN YANG models work in the IETF METMOD WG. The IEEE 802.1 WG which met in a plenary meeting last week discussed and responded. The response and the initial mail are posted at http://www.ieee802.org/1/files/

Re: [netmod] Next NETMOD chair

Thanks for the splendid job done, Juergen! Regards, Dan > -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ersue, > Mehmet (Nokia - DE/Munich) > Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 11:52 PM > To: Bert Wijnen (IETF); Benoit Claise; NETMOD Working Group; Juergen >

Re: [netmod] Last Call: (Defining and Using Metadata with YANG) to Proposed Standard

This documents looks fine to me. I have one comment though. In Section 6: >[RFC6110] defines the standard mapping of YANG data models to Document Schema Definition Languages (DSDL) [ISO.19757-1]. This section specifies the mapping for the extension statement "md:annotation" (Sec

[netmod] FW: [STDS-802-3] Consensus building presentation for the IEEE 802.3 YANG data model(s) CFI now available

Hi, Please see the information below about a Call For Interest (CFI) about Ethernet YANG models which will be discussed at the IEEE 802 LMSC March 2016 Plenary meeting in Macao SAR, P.R. China (next week). A Call for Interest in IEEE 802 is approximatively the equivalent of a non-WG forming BO

Re: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft

Hi, Concerning cooperation with the IEEE, we have in place a mechanism of communication between the IETF and IEEE 802. Mahesh Jethanadani and myself are involved. The key thing is to send information about important milestones (like Last Calls) to the IEEE, it can be done via email, no need for

Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity YANG module

That's what I meant - LNEs seem to be an instantiation of logical entities. Regards, Dan > -Original Message- > From: Lou Berger [mailto:lber...@labn.net] > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:04 PM > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Martin Bjorklund; bcla...@cisco.com >

Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity YANG module

Martin Bjorklund [mailto:m...@tail-f.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:31 PM > To: bcla...@cisco.com > Cc: wlup...@broadband-forum.org; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); > netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity YANG > module > > Benoit

Re: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft

"I support this work and I will provide the time necessary to review the drafts as they progress through the WG" Regards, Dan > -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Juergen > Schoenwaelder > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 10:22 PM > To: Robe

Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity YANG module

So, let's do it. Tom, or one of the other chairs - you need to run this. Regards, Dan > -Original Message- > From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bcla...@cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 9:18 PM > To: Nadeau Thomas; Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > Cc: netmod@ietf.org &g

Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity YANG module

Concerning the 'draft status' - anything prevents the wg from running a short consensus call and adding this item to the netmod milestones? Regards, Dan > -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nadeau > Thomas > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015

Re: [netmod] And another peak of new YANG models just before the submission deadline

COMPILATION PASSED/TOTAL ratio, sorry. Dan > -Original Message- > From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 11:32 AM > To: 'Benoit Claise'; NETMOD Working Group > Subject: RE: [netmod] And another peak of new YANG models just before > the

Re: [netmod] And another peak of new YANG models just before the submission deadline

The TOTAL/COMPILATION PASSED ratio seems to have improved since April from ~25% to ~40%. This is good, but there is room for improvement. Regards, Dan > -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:3

Re: [netmod] interim meeting NEW webex

I joined one where I am the only person in the call ☺ Can someone re-send? Thanks and Regards, Dan From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mahesh Jethanandani Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 5:16 PM To: Nadeau Thomas Cc: netmod WG Subject: Re: [netmod] interim meeting NEW we

Re: [netmod] opstate-reqs #7: Why limit scope to just IETF-defined modules

Hi, There is a difference between providing guidance to other SDOs or organizations, and writing YANG modules for them. The role of the activity in the IETF should be to provide guidance, partly in informational RFCs, partly in the IETF YANG modules which can be used as design examples. We can

Re: [netmod] [I2nsf] Further Narrowing the I2NSF scope: the new charter for IETF 93

I am fine with the editing proposed by Myo as it makes the scope more clear. Maybe the only thing I would suggest is to use 'non-standard' rather than 'bespoke' which may puzzle the non-native English speakers. I had to go to the dictionary to see what it exactly means (but it may be only me!).