Speaking about mount - was I the alone in thinking during the virtual interim yesterday about the relationship between the entity and mount I-Ds. Maybe up to merging them? Are not NLEs the same (or almost) as logical entities?
Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Bjorklund [mailto:m...@tail-f.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:31 PM > To: bcla...@cisco.com > Cc: wlup...@broadband-forum.org; Romascanu, Dan (Dan); > netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity YANG > module > > Benoit Claise <bcla...@cisco.com> wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > > > It would be great if we can receive a status update on the Entity YANG > > > model from the design team. > > > > The design team is waiting for the WG to decide on adoption of the > > document. Last time this was discussed I think the chairs said that > > the WG did not have any cycles for new work until current work was > > finished, but I'll leave this to the chairs to answer. > > > > There are actually quite a few drafts to consider when it is time to > > add more work to the WG; "mount", "opstate", > > draft-entitydt-netmod-entity, draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang, > > draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang, > > draft-lear-ietf-netmod-acl-dnsname, draft-vallin-alarm-yang-module to > > name a few. I guess we need to prioritize. > > > > > > > > /martin > > > > > > > And a milestone on the NETMOD charter would also make sense. > > > > > > Regards, Benoit > > > > Is there a status update on ietf-entity please? I don't see it as a > > > > milestone in the charter but maybe I don't know where to look. > > > > > > > > Message received re YANG 1.1. All BBF YANG will use YANG 1.1. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > William > > > > > > > >> On 15 Dec 2015, at 10:17, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > <droma...@avaya.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> So, let's do it. Tom, or one of the other chairs - you need to run > > > >> this. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> > > > >> Dan > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > > >>> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bcla...@cisco.com] > > > >>> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 9:18 PM > > > >>> To: Nadeau Thomas; Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > > > >>> Cc: netmod@ietf.org > > > >>> Subject: Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf-entity > > > >>> YANG > > > >>> module > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>> I personally don’t see anything that prevents this. > > > >>> Same opinion here. > > > >>> > > > >>> Regards, Benoit > > > >>>> —Tom > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> On Dec 13, 2015:6:56 AM, at 6:56 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) > > > >>> <droma...@avaya.com> wrote: > > > >>>>> Concerning the 'draft status' - anything prevents the wg from > running > > > >>>>> a > > > >>> short consensus call and adding this item to the netmod milestones? > > > >>>>> Regards, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Dan > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > > > >>>>>> From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Nadeau > > > >>>>>> Thomas > > > >>>>>> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 4:27 PM > > > >>>>>> To: William Lupton > > > >>>>>> Cc: netmod@ietf.org > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [netmod] Broadband Forum intention of using ietf- > entity > > > >>>>>> YANG module > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Dependance on 1.1 should not be an issue as that is almost > ready to > > > >>>>>> be approved. You should be building your model to comply with > the 1.1 > > > >>> rules. > > > >>>>>> —Tom > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Dec 11, 2015:8:00 AM, at 8:00 AM, William Lupton > > > >>>>>> <wlup...@broadband-forum.org> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> All, > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> The Broadband Forum would like to use the ietf-entity YANG > module > > > >>>>>> (currently draft-entitydt-netmod-entity) for equipment > management > > > >>>>>> but we are a bit concerned about its draft status and its > dependence > > > >>>>>> on > > > >>> YANG 1.1. > > > >>>>>> Any advice or reassurance? > > > >>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>> William > > > >>>> _______________________________________________ > > > >>>> netmod mailing list > > > >>>> netmod@ietf.org > > > >>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > > > >>> 3A__www.ietf.org_mail _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
