Greetings Rob,
We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata
report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at
https://ww
Rob,
Errata should be accepted.
Kent
> On Jan 18, 2023, at 9:29 AM, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8519,
> "YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)".
>
> --
> You may review the report
This errata should be accepted. Thanks.
> On Jan 18, 2023, at 6:29 AM, RFC Errata System
> wrote:
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8519,
> "YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)".
>
> --
> You may review the report
This erratum looks correct to me and (IMHO) should be verified.
Eliot
On 18.01.23 15:29, RFC Errata System wrote:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8519,
"YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)".
--
You may review the rep
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8519,
"YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7312
--
Type: Editorial
Re
