Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08

...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jürgen Sch?nw?lder Sent: Saturday, September 9, 2023 5:09 AM To: Jan Lindblad Cc: netmod@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08 I have read draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08 and my concerns remain. While I do see some valid use

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08

addressed by the WG after adoption Italo From: Kent Watsen Sent: martedì 5 settembre 2023 14:43 To: netmod@ietf.org Subject: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08 NETMOD WG, This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-netmod

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08

poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08 I have read draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08 and my concerns remain. While I do see some valid use cases for this, I am concerned that this mechanism will be abused. The writing suggests that the server can dynamically decide what it considers immutable

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08

Hi all, I support adoption of this document. I think it is a good starting point and provide an explicit way to document config data node access restriction rules and make it visible to all clients, this is important for network automation and in addition to improve interoperability for

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08

On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 5:42 AM Kent Watsen wrote: > NETMOD WG, > > This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag/08 > > There is no known IPR on this draft (IPR call >

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08

I have read draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08 and my concerns remain. While I do see some valid use cases for this, I am concerned that this mechanism will be abused. The writing suggests that the server can dynamically decide what it considers immutable. If true, its a small step to have the

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08

Hi, all I support the adoption. It can add ability for the YANG modeling . Best Regards Zongpeng Du duzongp...@foxmail.com & duzongp...@chinamobile.com From: Kent Watsen Date: 2023-09-05 20:42 To: netmod@ietf.org Subject: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-fla

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08

Jürgen, I agree completely with you regarding transactional management. Well said. In my reading of -08, however, I don't see the non-transactional behavior you describe in there any more. It was there in -01, but based on feedback from me and others, I think it has been washed out. If you

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08

I do not support this work. Yes, it is some effort on the server side to figure out how move from config state A to config state B. This proposal essentially pushes the work towards the clients that now have to figure out how to single step a server from config state A to config state B - and if

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08

___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

[netmod] Adoption poll for draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag-08

NETMOD WG, This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-netmod-immutable-flag/08 There is no known IPR on this draft (IPR call ). Please voice your support or technical