etry protocol as a good
> basis and provide a clear semantics which is different from intent you
> quoted from elsewhere.
>
> -Qin
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Randy Presuhn
> 发送时间: 2021年3月18日 6:47
> 收件人: netmod@ietf.org
> 主题: Re: [netmod]
Randy Presuhn
发送时间: 2021年3月18日 6:47
收件人: netmod@ietf.org
主题: Re: [netmod] ECA Policy: What is an adequate abstraction level to express
policies and intent
Hi -
On 2021-03-17 4:15 AM, tom petch wrote:
From: netmod on behalf of Randy Presuhn
Sent: 10 March 2021 18:28
On 2021-03-10 12:43 AM, Ju
elsewhere.
-Qin
-邮件原件-
发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Randy Presuhn
发送时间: 2021年3月18日 6:47
收件人: netmod@ietf.org
主题: Re: [netmod] ECA Policy: What is an adequate abstraction level to express
policies and intent
Hi -
On 2021-03-17 4:15 AM, tom petch wrote:
> From: net
Hi -
On 2021-03-17 4:15 AM, tom petch wrote:
From: netmod on behalf of Randy Presuhn
Sent: 10 March 2021 18:28
On 2021-03-10 12:43 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
Dear Qin,
I believe this work repeats failures of the past but since the WG
agreed to entertain this, I will keep my mouth shut
From: netmod on behalf of Randy Presuhn
Sent: 10 March 2021 18:28
On 2021-03-10 12:43 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> Dear Qin,
>
> I believe this work repeats failures of the past but since the WG
> agreed to entertain this, I will keep my mouth shut. I suggest you do
> not spend your energy
Hi -
On 2021-03-10 12:43 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
Dear Qin,
I believe this work repeats failures of the past but since the WG
agreed to entertain this, I will keep my mouth shut. I suggest you do
not spend your energy to convince the that this work is viable since
it is rather unlikely
Dear Qin,
I believe this work repeats failures of the past but since the WG
agreed to entertain this, I will keep my mouth shut. I suggest you do
not spend your energy to convince the that this work is viable since
it is rather unlikely that I will change my mind.
YANG is for me _not_ a suitable
Hi, Juergen:
Come back to the key issues for ECA Policy.
I think Policies need to be readable and hence be expressed at a high level of
abstraction and in a suitable _language_.
But I propose to separate policy expression and intent representation,
especially high level service intent representat
