Re: [netmod] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04

I assume 'An annotation carries a single value.' should be clear enough. A reference to section 7.6 is actually misleading since that section deals with many more things that are not applicable to leafs. But I think we are already done with this. /js On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:39:54PM +, tom

Re: [netmod] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04

- Original Message - From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder" Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 1:07 PM > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:15:28AM +, tom p. wrote: > > Lada, Robert > > > > The other angle from which this might be approached is that the I-D > > already says > > > > " Using the "type" sta

Re: [netmod] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04

Yes, thanks. On 3/11/16 9:04 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: On 11 Mar 2016, at 14:07, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:15:28AM +, tom p. wrote: Lada, Robert The other angle from which this might be approached is that the I-D already says " Using the "type" statemen

Re: [netmod] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04

> On 11 Mar 2016, at 14:07, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:15:28AM +, tom p. wrote: >> Lada, Robert >> >> The other angle from which this might be approached is that the I-D >> already says >> >> " Using the "type" statement, a type is specified for the an

Re: [netmod] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:15:28AM +, tom p. wrote: > Lada, Robert > > The other angle from which this might be approached is that the I-D > already says > > " Using the "type" statement, a type is specified for the annotation >value according to the same rules as for YANG "leaf" type.

Re: [netmod] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04

> On 11 Mar 2016, at 12:15, tom p. wrote: > > Lada, Robert > > The other angle from which this might be approached is that the I-D > already says > > " Using the "type" statement, a type is specified for the annotation > value according to the same rules as for YANG "leaf" type. " > > whi

Re: [netmod] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04

Lada, Robert The other angle from which this might be approached is that the I-D already says " Using the "type" statement, a type is specified for the annotation value according to the same rules as for YANG "leaf" type. " while rfc6020bis says " The "leaf" statement is used to define a

Re: [netmod] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04

> On 11 Mar 2016, at 00:57, Robert Sparks wrote: > > > > On 3/9/16 11:04 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> thanks for the review, I apologize for replying late, please see my >> responses inline: >> >> Robert Sparks writes: >> >>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this d

Re: [netmod] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04

On 3/9/16 11:04 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Hi Robert, thanks for the review, I apologize for replying late, please see my responses inline: Robert Sparks writes: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being proc

Re: [netmod] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04

Hi Robert, thanks for the review, I apologize for replying late, please see my responses inline: Robert Sparks writes: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Ple

[netmod] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at