t; , "netmod-...@ietf.org" ,
> "netmod@ietf.org"
> Subject: Re: [netmod] YANG module security considerations template - TLS
> reference
> Resent-From:
> Resent-To: , ,
,
>
> Resent-Date: Monday, October 1, 2018 at 10:25
?-Original Message-
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)"
Date: Monday, October 1, 2018 at 10:25 AM
To: Martin Bjorklund , "netmod-cha...@ietf.org"
, "netmod-...@ietf.org" ,
"netmod@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [netmod] YANG module security considerations template - T
uot;netmod-...@ietf.org" ,
"netmod@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [netmod] YANG module security considerations template - TLS
reference
Resent-From:
Resent-To: , , ,
Resent-Date: Monday, October 1, 2018 at 10:25 AM
Agreed - although I'm not sure who has control over the template either.
Agreed - although I'm not sure who has control over the template either.
For drafts that are in-progress, IDNITs will flag this obsolete reference and,
for at least one of the drafts I'm an editor, I've already made the update.
Thanks,
Acee
On 10/1/18, 3:19 AM, "netmod on behalf of Martin Bj
Hi,
In their review of draft-ietf-netconf-nmda-restconf, the IESG
suggested we update the reference to TLS from RFC 5246 to RFC 8446
(which obsoletes 5246).
This update needs to be done to the template available at
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines
(it is not quite cle